Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
Revision as of 21:58, 13 August 2016 by LegoFan4000 (Talk | contribs)

Articles for Deletion - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits - Proposed Name Changes

Articles for Deletion is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedy}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion.


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was 600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. LegoFan4000 talk 21:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Brickipedia:Beta period tasklist

This page was imported from Meta and was originally for the Beta phase a few years ago, should we delete it or keep it as an archive for historical reference? (Won't hurt to keep it either)


  1. No reason not to. LegoFan4000 talk 23:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Didn't you delete the April Fools Day and the old forums and all that other stuff? Surely that is just as worthy for historical reference (perhaps more so as this is meta stuff). Either we keep all old rubbish or none afaic. CJC95 (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


  1. Can't really see a need for Bricki to archive Meta stuff that isn't currenty being used on Bricki. NovaHawk 05:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
  2. Per NovaHawk. More than focusing on such old and outdated things, we should look into expanding Help:Brickimedia and such pages to ensure that we have an accurate historical record of what happened and when.
  3. 600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. LegoFan4000 talk 21:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

While being precise is always important, we don't need to be too precise, as in "Jack Phoenix deployed extension X at 1 March 2016 13:45 UTC" but rather focus on the big picture. --Jack Phoenix (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


All pages here



  1. They're way out of date and serve no purpose- we have categories that produce exactly the same lists except they're up to date. NovaHawk 05:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
  2. Per NovaAlbus Potter (talk) 12:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
  3. Also, per nova. LegoFan4000 talk 14:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
  4. Would need a lot of work now that LEGO has updated to 5-digit codes for regular products; categorization is the best way to go... Berrybrick (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
  5. 600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. LegoFan4000 talk 21:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)