Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion
| Overview
Articles for Deletion is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger. Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedy}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion. |
| Instructions for use
To leave a nomination, click here and replace |
Contents
Nominations
Template:User_meta and Category:Brickipedians who contribute to Brickimedia Meta
Making a proposal just in case. Should we keep this and change it to "Used to contribute to" (past tense), or just delete it? SamanthaNguyen (talk)
01:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete
- As nominator SamanthaNguyen (talk)
01:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC) - Never really understood how you'd really "contribute to meta" in the first place since it was mainly for image uploads NovaHawk 01:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ditto. --Jack Phoenix
(Contact) 08:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep
Comments
- So there's also Template:User customs, Category:Brickipedians_who_contribute_to_Brickimedia_Customs, Category:Brickipedians who also contribute to the Custom Lego Wiki, Category:Brickipedians who contribute to the LEGO Ideas Wiki, as well as Template:User ideasWiki. We should probably delete these too. SamanthaNguyen (talk)
01:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well we do have Template:User reviews for the reviews space, so we should probably either delete the reviews template or turn the customs one into one for the fan space NovaHawk 02:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that repurposing the customs template makes sense, but since the Ideas wiki is gone, there's no reason to keep that template around. --Jack Phoenix
(Contact) 08:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that repurposing the customs template makes sense, but since the Ideas wiki is gone, there's no reason to keep that template around. --Jack Phoenix
- Well we do have Template:User reviews for the reviews space, so we should probably either delete the reviews template or turn the customs one into one for the fan space NovaHawk 02:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Passed
All skins with their own project page along with Brickipedia:SkinsThere's not enough content for each skin to have their own project page really. These pages are Brickipedia:Refreshed, Brickipedia:Deep Sea, Brickipedia:Monobook, Brickipedia:Lia, Brickipedia:Quartz, Brickipedia:Custard, and Brickipedia:Skins. Instead, we could just link people for those curious to Special:Preferences to show them what skins they can choose from, as well as Special:Version. Delete
KeepComments |
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Brickipedia:Beta period tasklistThis page was imported from Meta and was originally for the Beta phase a few years ago, should we delete it or keep it as an archive for historical reference? (Won't hurt to keep it either) Keep
Delete
While being precise is always important, we don't need to be too precise, as in "Jack Phoenix deployed extension X at 1 March 2016 13:45 UTC" but rather focus on the big picture. --Jack Phoenix (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Comments
All pages hereKeepDelete
Comment |