Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Forums: Index →

Administrators' noticeboard

→ Articles for Deletion

This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.

Ark of the Covenant

Delete

1. Though it's important to the storyline, it's just another feature for the set. I don't think it really deserves its own page. --Alphateam7911 21:27, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. I dont see the point of having all these extra pages about parts of the sets. This should go on the page of whatever set it is included inUser:Mackmoron11/sig
3. Per Mackmoron11 NovaHawk 22:57, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
4. Per Mackmoron11. Construction Worker Do you need help? 22:09, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
5. Per above. Ajraddatz _Talk 16:45, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
6. I say delete unless you are going to make pages like the holy grail and stuff--User:Joeman200/sig 05:24, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. That is part of a set and a major part of the story. Why delete it? User:CloneComanderCody/sig 11:39 January 3, 2010 (UTC)
2. --User:Coupon11/sig 16:44, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
3. per CloneComanderCody. -Nerfblasterpro: It's Nerf, or Nothing! 22:55, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
4. per CloneCommanderCody as well.--User:Legoguy1866/siggy 13:14, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
5. Per BF2.--Agent Chase: :Agents in Action! 02:37, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
6. It's an article-its the main part of Indiana Jones 1-It is gold-and it is better than nothing.User:BobaFett2/sig2
7. I like the article--Brickboymaker 15:35, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Saying that you like the article really isn't a good enough reason. I think this vote should be removed. Construction Worker Do you need help? 11:32, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

* At any rate, this page needs an "Appearances" section if it's even going to be considered for keeping. NovaHawk 22:46, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Diagon Alley

As of now we know diagon alley is in a set and probably the game. But the article explains nothings, misses out an appearance and uses a minifigure template. If Diagon is a hub or something in the game, then ok, but at the moment i dont see it as article worthy. (unless we bring back all the bionicle locations >_>) Kingcjc 22:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

1. Kingcjc 22:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
2. There have been three Diagon Alley-based sets, but I don't see a need to have an article on the Alley itself NovaHawk 00:27, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
3. Per cjc and Nighthawk. Construction Worker Do you need help? 20:37, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. Diagon Alley is a vital part of not only Harry Potter, but LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4 as well. I have also expanded the article, and I think we should keep it due to it not only being the LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4 hub, but also a vital part of the story line. Quickbuild2345 20:39, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

   Source for it being the hub? NovaHawk 00:25, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

2. 's not that bad...User:BobaFett2/sig2

Comments

• You may have expanded it, but it doesn't seem like a vital part in the storyline. The only place it should be mentioned is the articles for the sets that have it in them. Construction Worker Do you need help? 00:14, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

List of Clone brands

Delete

1. Do we really need to be listed other LEGO-like products? NovaHawk 03:05, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. Here's a hint: This is a LEGO wiki. =P Construction Worker Do you need help? 20:39, March 2, 2010 (UTC)