Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Forums: Index →
Administrators' noticeboard
→ Articles for Deletion

This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.

Diagon Alley

As of now we know diagon alley is in a set and probably the game. But the article explains nothings, misses out an appearance and uses a minifigure template. If Diagon is a hub or something in the game, then ok, but at the moment i dont see it as article worthy. (unless we bring back all the bionicle locations >_>) Kingcjc 22:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Kingcjc 22:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
  2. There have been three Diagon Alley-based sets, but I don't see a need to have an article on the Alley itself NovaHawk 00:27, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Per cjc and Nighthawk. Construction Worker Do you need help? 20:37, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. There have been a few sets based on this location, but it seems odd to have a page about the location just because a few sets were made of it. If it appears in the new Harry Potter game, then it might be worth having a page for it if it is a major place in the game, but otherwise, I dont see much use for it.User:Mackmoron11/sig 14:48, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Diagon Alley is a vital part of not only Harry Potter, but LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4 as well. I have also expanded the article, and I think we should keep it due to it not only being the LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4 hub, but also a vital part of the story line. Quickbuild2345 20:39, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
    Source for it being the hub? NovaHawk 00:25, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
  2. 's not that bad...User:BobaFett2/sig2
  3. its a big part of harry potter --Brickboymaker 19:23, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
  4. This article needs to be definetly Kept.-- WHAT?!?! User:Eddlikeshotsauce KABOOM 23:19, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
  5. I don't see any good reason to remove it... Ajraddatz Talk 13:41, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • You may have expanded it, but it doesn't seem like a vital part in the storyline. The only place it should be mentioned is the articles for the sets that have it in them. Construction Worker Do you need help? 00:14, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

All LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4 minifigures which have only appeared in this game to date

Delete

  1. We don't even know that these characters will even make it to the final cut of the game, and if they do, they may only appear for a brief second in a cutscene so why make articles about them? NovaHawk 23:37, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
    • I would count images/trailers/confirmed in previews as existing Kingcjc 17:05, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Only keep ones with pictures to have proof. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 19:43, March 12, 2010 (UTC) P.S. Delete Moaning Myrtle. I have a problem with perverted ghosts.
  3. Per above. Construction Worker Do you need help? 23:41, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Ok, I think you should keep Moaning Myrtle, Crookshanks and any others that have appeared in screenshots or in trailers. As for the others, delete until the game is released, and if they appear, create a new article for them. Mageamooney.
  2. IF they've all appeared, keep them all. If they're not in the final game, then delete them then. What's the point of the future release templates if we're not even going to use them.--User:Darthch/sig 13:13, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Per Darthch. User:Mariofighter3/sig3 23:48, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. I don't want to get rid of any pages unless we really need to. They look fine to me. Ajraddatz Talk 23:20, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Well, they might be in the game, and since they have apparently been in a trailer or something, it is likely that they will be. Also, with the thing about them only appearing for a second or two, I've always figured if they were in the game at all they should be listed, even if they are unplayable.User:Mackmoron11/sig 14:45, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • To clarify, all articles listed above have appeared in trailers, pictures etc for the game. However, it isn't known if they'll be playable or appear in a cutscene for a frame, or if they'll even make it to the final cut of the game. NovaHawk 23:58, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Gungan

Delete

  1. Per comments below NovaHawk 06:00, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

  • The only two Gungans that have appeared in LEGO are Jar Jar Binks and Gungan Warrior. Does there really need to be an article about this? If so, wouldn't it imply we'd need an article on "Hutt", "Human" and "Mandalorian" as well? NovaHawk 06:00, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Articles_for_Deletion&oldid=690036"