Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Forums: Index →

Administrators' noticeboard

→ Articles for Deletion

This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.

Template:Category year

Delete

1. I don't really see the use of this template. It was displayed on nearly all year pages, but it only showed a piece of coding. I removed and replaced it since from those pages. I don't know if it is in some case necessary, so I'll put it here. Is it needed? User:Samdo994/sig2 14:32, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
2. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 15:33, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
3. I agree. -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON! 14:35, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
4. Definitely not necessary. Quickbuild2345 18:49, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

File:Mawhonic 3.jpg

Delete

1. I think this image should be deleted because it's a bad quality and custom edited. The legs don't look good/real in this image either, and it isn't even known if these legs are the legs of Mawhonic. User:Samdo994/sig2 15:31, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
2. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 15:33, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
3. Ajraddatz _Talk 18:12, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
4. Ok, but hopefully another image (more high-res) can be added in its place one day. -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON! 14:35, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
5. Yeah, hi-res would have made it so much better. Quickbuild2345 18:50, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

File:Mawhonics pod 3.jpg

Delete

1. Same as above, custom image edit. User:Samdo994/sig2 15:31, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
2. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 15:33, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
3. Ajraddatz _Talk 18:12, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
4. See above. -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON! 14:35, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. The minifig's cheesy, but the pod's a keeper.Quickbuild2345 18:52, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Yeah, but we have already got an image of the pod, see File:Mawhonics pod.jpg. User:Samdo994/sig2 18:55, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

All articles of Category:Box art only minifigures

Delete

1. I cannot see the use of having articles on minifigures which only appeared on box arts... User:Samdo994/sig2 14:21, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
2. Well, if they are not official minifigures, then I guess they are worth deleting. SPREE! -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON! 14:35, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. But it is used... and I don't see why to delete it... User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:05, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Agreed. Quickbuild2345 18:53, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I mean, is it useful to have an article for a minifigure which only appeared on a box? Seriously, I really think that is unneeded. User:Samdo994/sig2

Super Battle Droid Commander

Delete

1. Technically, due to their arms, this is what they are in the Star Wars Universe, however LEGO just calls them Super Battle Droids. I don't really see anything wrong with just listing these as a variant on Super Battle Droid, but at the same time I guess I would be ok with having a page on them, but if the page stays it definitely needs a cleanup. Weak delete vote. NovaHawk 03:24, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

1. I'd say merge with Super Battle Droid, with a subheader. User:Samdo994/sig2 13:46, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Beauxbatons Student

Delete

• Do we really need a page of every generic student who's appeared in the LHP trailers? If we do, we'll need a lot of pages like "Hogwarts Student 1", "Hogwarts Student 2", "Hogwarts Student 3", "Hogwarts Student 4", etc. And while we're at it, let's make a page for every Battle Droid which has appeared in the LSW games :/ NovaHawk 22:37, June 2, 2010 (UTC)