Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Forums: Index →

Administrators' noticeboard

→ Articles for Deletion

This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.

James Potter and Lily Evans

Delete

1. These characters have only appeared as a sticker on one of the Harry Potter sets. Video game appearances have been continually added to the page, but has not once been backed up by a valid source. NovaHawk 06:36, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
2. True, true. -Mariofighter3: Brickfliming now in session! 03:25, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
3. Let's let the Harry Potter site finish and then if there's no image of them we can assume that they are irrelevant.12:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:41, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
4. The main reason why I think we were keeping these pages were because we thought they might appear in LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4. But I recently bought this game, and they do not make an appearance. - Legocity200 05:12, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• I've listed these articles because they're basically on the same topic (they appear on the same sticker). If there's a need to list them separately, feel free to split them NovaHawk 06:36, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

• I think that we should wait for about two weeks for Harry Potter: Years 1-4 to be released. Then, James Potter and Lily Evans appear, we keep the page. If they do not, we delete it. In the meantime, we should keep it.

Legocity200 17:20, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Ice-cream man

Delete

1. Do we really need anything that appears in a cut-scene for a video game? NovaHawk 03:15, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
2. Nope. Anyways, I think Brickipedia has got a lot of those unrelevant articles... User:Samdo994/sig1 10:40, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
3. Yeah, it's not really relevant.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:19, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
4. what a reason to keep >_> Kingcjc 15:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I like that page,it makes me laugh.Just an image and more info will do the trick.Dionnefamily 23:13, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

@Dionnefamily: Sorry, but that's no reason. Thing is, we need to decide if it's relevant or not. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:30, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Droid (Star Wars)

Delete

• Per the past Protocol droid nomination- just not needed, and if we have it, pages like "Jedi", "Korun", "Togrutan", etc could start showing up NovaHawk 00:10, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

1. PA Kingcjc 15:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. There are many droid minifigures and we keep a death star page...this isn't THAT different.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:18, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

"Movies and Lego"

This page really seems to be really unnecessary in my opinion. It just doesn't have enough information and fact. It could be changed to something better, like a list but then there wouldn't be enough to write about it apart from the list. If this page is going to be kept, I at least propose that the name is changed to something like "LEGO Movie tie-ins".--S•h•o•b•y•4 (Talk•Edits•Contribs) 04:04, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Deleted, due to it being off-topic- such pages can be marked with {{speedydelete}} NovaHawk 04:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

"X-treme Daredevils" and "Backyard Blasters"

Delete

1. Those articles contain the names of the group members, nothing more. The information could be easily put into the World Racers article. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:30, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. For now let's keep them. More will become known soon so they might be important later on.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:15, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Deleted. They're factions, and there was a decision a while ago to get rid of all the Star Wars factions, and this isn't really any different. NovaHawk 23:40, July 3, 2010 (UTC)