Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Forums: Index →

Administrators' noticeboard

→ Articles for Deletion

This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.

James Potter and Lily Evans

Delete

1. These characters have only appeared as a sticker on one of the Harry Potter sets. Video game appearances have been continually added to the page, but has not once been backed up by a valid source. NovaHawk 06:36, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
2. True, true. -Mariofighter3: Brickfliming now in session! 03:25, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
3. Let's let the Harry Potter site finish and then if there's no image of them we can assume that they are irrelevant.12:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:41, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
4. The main reason why I think we were keeping these pages were because we thought they might appear in LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4. But I recently bought this game, and they do not make an appearance. - Legocity200 05:12, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• I've listed these articles because they're basically on the same topic (they appear on the same sticker). If there's a need to list them separately, feel free to split them NovaHawk 06:36, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

• I think that we should wait for about two weeks for Harry Potter: Years 1-4 to be released. Then, James Potter and Lily Evans appear, we keep the page. If they do not, we delete it. In the meantime, we should keep it.

Legocity200 17:20, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Ice-cream man

Delete

1. Do we really need anything that appears in a cut-scene for a video game? NovaHawk 03:15, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
2. Nope. Anyways, I think Brickipedia has got a lot of those unrelevant articles... User:Samdo994/sig1 10:40, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
3. Yeah, it's not really relevant.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:19, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
4. what a reason to keep >_> Kingcjc 15:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I like that page,it makes me laugh.Just an image and more info will do the trick.Dionnefamily 23:13, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

@Dionnefamily: Sorry, but that's no reason. Thing is, we need to decide if it's relevant or not. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:30, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Droid (Star Wars)

Delete

• Per the past Protocol droid nomination- just not needed, and if we have it, pages like "Jedi", "Korun", "Togrutan", etc could start showing up NovaHawk 00:10, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

1. PA Kingcjc 15:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. There are many droid minifigures and we keep a death star page...this isn't THAT different.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:18, July 3, 2010 (UTC)