Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Articles for Scrap - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits

Overview Articles for Scrap is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger. Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion.

Instructions for use To leave a nomination, click here and replace Article Name with the name of the article that you think should be deleted. Under the Delete header, type the reason why you think the article should be deleted, and then sign your name with ~~~~. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.

Category:Explore Parts

Delete

1. This category has little pages and basically, the Explore parts are DUPLO parts, although Explore is not a subtheme of it. User:Samdo994/sig1 15:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I see no reason to delete it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

1. Surely, it has little pages as not all pages are made yet. Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Boggart

Delete

1. Do we really need this? Unless we make it into the page about the Boggart impersonating Professor Snape in the Lupin's Classroom set. NovaHawk 08:23, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
2. When it's not playable, we should delete this and put that information into the Professor Snape page, if necessary. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:28, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
3. PA Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. There is more than one in the game. They are in many places.User:BobaFett2/sig2 13:03, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
2. Can we please stop deleting articles when they don't need to be? Who cares if it doesn't have much content, it's still an article and there is no reason to remove it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:47, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Devil's Snare

Delete

1. NovaHawk 23:27, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
2. Not playbale, so delete. What about the Forum:Non-playable video game characters? Are we going to put that through? User:Samdo994/sig1 10:34, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
3. PA Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. It appeared in the set forbidden corridor. —Unsigned comment by Berrybrick (talk • contribs).
2. It appears many times in the game.User:BobaFett2/sig2 16:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
3. I don't play it but per Boba. User:CaptainJag/sig1 20:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
4. Why must we delete content articles for no reason :S User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:47, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Ummm, Boba? Is "appearing many times" a relevant reason to keep this? User:Samdo994/sig1 17:47, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

It appears in almost every level, it also appears around hogwarts castle. It requires a specific spell to get rid of (there's a spell devoted to it entirely) so yes.User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:02, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

1349 LEGO Studios Steven Spielberg MovieMaker Set/Parts

Delete

1. I think we have scrapped that idea of having inventories now. If this one is deleted, don't forget to delete these redirect pages: This one and this one. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:01, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I still think inventories are a good idea, especially now we have more and more parts articles created. NovaHawk 23:56, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
2. I never new that these existed.User:BobaFett2/sig2 00:02, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
3. You know, if we actually started placing these in articles we would have hit 10,000 already. GG 360 10:22, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
4. PA Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
5. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:48, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I have an idea, see Forum:Set Reviews on Brickipedia. We could set up a tab with a new namespace, named Inventory or something like that. That way we don't have to have such long names, we can put it into Inventory:1349 LEGO Studios Steven Spielberg MovieMaker Set. User:Samdo994/sig1 10:19, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Harry Potter: Years 1-4

Delete

1. I just don't see the point to it. There's a list of appearances on LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4, and everything that makes an appearance has (or should have) the game listed in their "Appearances" section. NovaHawk 04:36, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
2. A category for Minifigures in a video game ! hehe Gladiatoring 12:36, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
3. Nah, we would need a category:LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures ect if we would keep this. User:Samdo994/sig1 13:27, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. It makes it a little easier for bots when someone wrecks an entire plethora of pages from a specific video game and that's all the bot needs to fix.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:14, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
2. PA. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:28, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
3. PA (That means per above, doesn't it?) User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:29, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it does. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:03, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Just saying this so the header will work... Too lazy to leave a <!-- --> or something like it. Even though I just did >.> User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:03, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Video Games

Keep

1. User:BobaFett2/sig2 13:20, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
2. --Legoguy2805 15:29, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
3. Why? Why do you want to get rid of all the content pages of the wiki? User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I added this nomination since NHL put a delete tag on it, with mentioning it was nominated here, which it wasn't. I am neutral to this vote. User:Samdo994/sig1 13:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

• ... yeah. I think I tagged the wrong page with the deletion template there, sorry. Meant to tag that with a cleanup template (which it's already been tagged with). NovaHawk 00:48, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

List of sets including Star Wars vehicles

Delete

1. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Again a link to here on the deletion template (placed by NHL again, I guess this is the one he means he wanted to mark above), but no nomination. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)