Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
Articles for Scrap - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits
Overview
Shortcut:
BP:AFS

Articles for Scrap is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion.

Instructions for use

To leave a nomination, click here and replace Article Name with the name of the article that you think should be deleted. Under the Delete header, type the reason why you think the article should be deleted, and then sign your name with ~~~~. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.

Category:Explore Parts

Delete

  1. This category has little pages and basically, the Explore parts are DUPLO parts, although Explore is not a subtheme of it. User:Samdo994/sig1 15:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. They are DUPLO parts , you dont seperate for example other themes into theme x part because it uses TECHNIC parts. Gladiatoring 16:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I see no reason to delete it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  1. Surely, it has little pages as not all pages are made yet. Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Boggart

Delete

  1. Do we really need this? Unless we make it into the page about the Boggart impersonating Professor Snape in the Lupin's Classroom set. NovaHawk 08:23, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
  2. When it's not playable, we should delete this and put that information into the Professor Snape page, if necessary. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:28, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
  3. PA Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. There is more than one in the game. They are in many places.User:BobaFett2/sig2 13:03, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Can we please stop deleting articles when they don't need to be? Who cares if it doesn't have much content, it's still an article and there is no reason to remove it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:47, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  3. We should keep it, it is a part of LEGO, after all.--Munchman14Store 23:44, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Why would we delete this!? It is a minifigure in a set too. Plus if this article were to be deleted, then why don't we go ahead and delete another 500 more like this to keep consistency? User:Danjam/Sig 09:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
  5. PA ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 14:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Why do we need to delete articles unless they have profanity or something.

Devil's Snare

Delete

  1. NovaHawk 23:27, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Not playbale, so delete. What about the Forum:Non-playable video game characters? Are we going to put that through? User:Samdo994/sig1 10:34, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
  3. PA Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. PAA Gladiatoring 16:28, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. It appeared in the set forbidden corridor. —Unsigned comment by Berrybrick (talk • contribs).
  2. It appears many times in the game.User:BobaFett2/sig2 16:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I don't play it but per Boba. User:CaptainJag/sig1 20:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Why must we delete content articles for no reason :S User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:47, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Per Ajraddatz.--Munchman14Store 23:47, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Ajraddatz is right, and it also appears in a set, just like the boggart. User:Danjam/Sig 09:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Ummm, Boba? Is "appearing many times" a relevant reason to keep this? User:Samdo994/sig1 17:47, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

It appears in almost every level, it also appears around hogwarts castle. It requires a specific spell to get rid of (there's a spell devoted to it entirely) so yes.User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:02, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

What set? ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 14:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)


Category:Harry Potter: Years 1-4

Delete

  1. I just don't see the point to it. There's a list of appearances on LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1-4, and everything that makes an appearance has (or should have) the game listed in their "Appearances" section. NovaHawk 04:36, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. A category for Minifigures in a video game ! hehe Gladiatoring 12:36, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Nah, we would need a category:LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures ect if we would keep this. User:Samdo994/sig1 13:27, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. It makes it a little easier for bots when someone wrecks an entire plethora of pages from a specific video game and that's all the bot needs to fix.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:14, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. PA. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:28, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  3. PA (That means per above, doesn't it?) User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:29, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it does. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:03, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just saying this so the header will work... Too lazy to leave a <!-- --> or something like it. Even though I just did >.> User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:03, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

List of sets including Star Wars vehicles

Delete

  1. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  2. User:BobaFett2/sig2 16:17, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Why? Whyyyyyy. Someone could look at this. What harm is it doing :S User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:10, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Per Ajr. User:Captain Jag/sig 08:32, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  3. PA ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 14:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Again a link to here on the deletion template (placed by NHL again, I guess this is the one he means he wanted to mark above), but no nomination. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

  • This has potential....I've used it in the past as a quick reference. User:Cpatain Rex/sig 21:48, August 23, 2010 (UTC)


Martian Hive

Not needed, can be merged with Mars Mission. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:01, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

  1. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:01, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Why delete it? User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:25, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. I agree with Ajraddatz. --User:NOBODY in...Squidy Jones: And the Dollar Bill of Doom Squidman (final).jpg- "Who doesn't love money?" 13:13, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I agree with Samdo. Lets just merge it. User:Danjam/Sig 09:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Merge into crystalien whatever, or give it an expansion and cleanup ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 14:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Tactical Droid

Not an actual minifig, never released, box art was just a battle droid Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 12:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 12:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

Bison

no use for a fig that did not come out. see above Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 12:43, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 12:43, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Articles_for_Deletion&oldid=690322"