Brickipedia:Articles for Deletion

Articles for Scrap - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits

Overview Articles for Scrap is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger. Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion.

Instructions for use To leave a nomination, click here and replace Article Name with the name of the article that you think should be deleted. Under the Delete header, type the reason why you think the article should be deleted, and then sign your name with ~~~~. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.

Category:Explore Parts

Delete

1. This category has little pages and basically, the Explore parts are DUPLO parts, although Explore is not a subtheme of it. User:Samdo994/sig1 15:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
2. They are DUPLO parts , you dont seperate for example other themes into theme x part because it uses TECHNIC parts. Gladiatoring 16:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
3. Only if they're all definitely DUPLO parts NovaHawk 08:52, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I see no reason to delete it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

1. Surely, it has little pages as not all pages are made yet. Kingcjc 19:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. The parts used are all DUPLO parts, there are no Explore parts Gladiatoring 14:34, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Martian Hive

Not needed, can be merged with Mars Mission. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:01, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

1. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:01, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
2. Or merge to Mars Mission or CrystAlien Conflict. Doesn't appear in a set or anything, only relevant to the theme's storyline and the online game. NovaHawk 05:09, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. Why delete it? User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:25, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
2. I agree with Ajraddatz. --User:NOBODY in...Squidy Jones: And the Dollar Bill of Doom - "Who doesn't love money?" 13:13, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
3. Just update it and it can be kept. GG 360One Year on Brickipedia 13:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I agree with Samdo. Lets just merge it. User:Danjam/Sig 09:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Merge into crystalien whatever, or give it an expansion and cleanup ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 14:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

btw this belongs in Brickipedia:Proposed Mergers. User:Ajraddatz/sig 18:12, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Tactical Droid

Not an actual minifig, never released, box art was just a battle droid Clone Commander Fox 12:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

1. Clone Commander Fox 12:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. --User:NOBODY in...Squidy Jones: And the Dollar Bill of Doom - "Who doesn't love money?" 13:17, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
3. User:Samdo994/sig1 13:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. Same reason for Bison surely. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 17:58, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. I'm ok with keeping it, but I think we need to create some sort of big template saying that the thing was never released. NovaHawk 05:10, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
3. GG 360One Year on Brickipedia 13:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
4. @@@ User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:59, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
5. i agree! TAHU97-THE MAKER OF BIONCLE BATTLES!!!!!!!!! 16:58, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Salazar Slytherin

Delete

1. Come on... do we really need this? And was there even anything saying that this picture of a fig was even Slytherin? NovaHawk 06:54, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
2. He only appeared in a videogame (see Forum:Non-playable video game characters) and there even only as a picture. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:46, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
3. Who makes these articles? GG 360One Year on Brickipedia 13:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. pls sir stawp trin to delete teh brickipedias 1 paeg at a tiem User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:00, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

1. Not really sureUser:BobaFett2/sig2 14:36, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Box art only minifigures and everything inside it

Delete

1. Do we really need this? NovaHawk 23:21, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
2. User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:37, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
3. This is riduculous, like Nighthwak leader said, do we really need this?--LEGOCityManiac11 10:20, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
4. Funny. I nominated that some time ago and it was voted to be kept... User:Samdo994/sig1 11:18, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Accessory Sets

Delete

1. Basically contained anything that was a key chain or pen. Just don't think we need another category for these. NovaHawk 10:12, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

There are Train accessories, System i Leg accessories, and they are obvious to what they contain, but Accessory sets , for key chains or pens? Key Chains are part of the super category Collectables and Merchandise, and Pens a part of LEGO Writing and in the super cat Office & School Supplies. I don't think they need to be further categorised than what they are already. —Unsigned comment by Gladiatoring (talk • contribs). 10:55, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

1. I think it should be kept, because we will have a super category of accessories with magnets, pens, pencils, and key chains.--LEGOCityManiac11 10:19, September 21, 2010 (UTC)