5614 The Good Wizard
From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
< Brickipedia:Articles for Rating | Class 1
Revision as of 03:45, 18 September 2012 by wikia>Cligra
- Nominated by: Agent Charge 07:33, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: It meets the criteria completely.
Vote score: -1, Technical Check: Currently OK
- Support
I actually don't see why not, other than the LDD models. Berrybrick 10:17, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Object
Too short for a C1 in my opinion, I just don't think there's enough to say about the contents of an impulse set for it to reach that rating. Also, what's with the last two images in the gal? They look like LDD renderings.... NovaHawk 01:28, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Um ... that would be because the images are LDD models. So if a impulse set cannot be Class 1, why isn't it stated in the criteria? Agent Charge 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Because it isn't a rule. It's just something that isn't possible, so it doesn't need to be said. For example, it would be pointless to make a law saying that "Cows are not permitted to fly airplanes underwater at -10 miles per hour." User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:30, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, how did this achieve Class 1 status? Agent Charge 02:46, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't an impulse set. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:02, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- So a part (1 piece) can become a c1 article, but an impulse set (More than 1) can't? That's weird. Agent Charge 21:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- I thought we had different criteria for a c1 part article (I know there was a forum about it a while ago, I think it was when I was inactive or something). Now knowing that there isn't I would have opposed that too. (note to all- when indenting in areas that contain votes, please start your formatting with a #, eg single indent- #:, double #::, etc. Thanks). NovaHawk 23:47, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- NBS, what do I do to improve it? Agent Charge 02:53, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if there is much you can do, since it covers all of the set well. User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:24, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Jag, I think it's a great article for what it's based on, but I just don't think it has the potential to reach c1 status NovaHawk 03:33, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, you oppose is invalid. The rules say If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid. Agent Charge 03:41, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I wrote that rule, and I'd say "I don't think it has the potential to be C1" is fairly concrete. Maybe just me, though. User:Cligra/Sig
- In that case, you oppose is invalid. The rules say If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid. Agent Charge 03:41, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Jag, I think it's a great article for what it's based on, but I just don't think it has the potential to reach c1 status NovaHawk 03:33, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if there is much you can do, since it covers all of the set well. User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:24, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- NBS, what do I do to improve it? Agent Charge 02:53, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- I thought we had different criteria for a c1 part article (I know there was a forum about it a while ago, I think it was when I was inactive or something). Now knowing that there isn't I would have opposed that too. (note to all- when indenting in areas that contain votes, please start your formatting with a #, eg single indent- #:, double #::, etc. Thanks). NovaHawk 23:47, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- So a part (1 piece) can become a c1 article, but an impulse set (More than 1) can't? That's weird. Agent Charge 21:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't an impulse set. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:02, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, how did this achieve Class 1 status? Agent Charge 02:46, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Because it isn't a rule. It's just something that isn't possible, so it doesn't need to be said. For example, it would be pointless to make a law saying that "Cows are not permitted to fly airplanes underwater at -10 miles per hour." User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:30, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Um ... that would be because the images are LDD models. So if a impulse set cannot be Class 1, why isn't it stated in the criteria? Agent Charge 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
Per NBS. User:Cligra/Sig
- Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
It has no background.. I think Castle has a story, doesn't it?
User:Cligra/Sig
- I didn't follow it too closely (or at all) but I don't think he played a role. If anyone would know though, Knight would, so ask him. Berrybrick 23:57, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Comments