Part 53450
From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
- Nominated by: –Agent Charge 22:14, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: It meets the criteria, and it stands out from most Class 2 articles. It has several pictures from different angles and a very thorough description.
Vote score: +2, Technical Check: Not OK
- Support
- Stormbringer Empire791 (talk) 23:33, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
I don't like the idea of C1 part articles, but I must admit this one is head and shoulders above the rest. User:Cligra/Sig
I've fixed what Berrybrick brought up. It looks good to me.
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
Looks good. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:05, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Object
Weak Oppose I would support if that image of the golden helmet was not from LDD. Berrybrick 10:23, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
Per Berrybrick (apart from the would support part)Personally I'd also like to see a list of element ID's for this article, it is meant to be the absolute best it can be to be a c1 after all. Honestly I thought this was a part of the infobox, but it looks like it got removed early on :S
NovaHawk 23:09, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- What would make you support? –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- The element IDs? Are those the numbers at the end of the building instructions? –Agent Charge 00:25, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe so.
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge- And where does that go? –Agent Charge 06:26, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Er...I've been wondering that myself. In my opinion, there should be a place in the part infobox for the element ID.
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge 06:28, October 23, 2012 (UTC)- There was when the template was first created, then it got removed a day or so after its creation :S Should I add it back in? NovaHawk 06:54, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I think so. Then we'd get to update all the part articles along with the idea KoN introduced! :D
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
- Yes, I think so. Then we'd get to update all the part articles along with the idea KoN introduced! :D
- There was when the template was first created, then it got removed a day or so after its creation :S Should I add it back in? NovaHawk 06:54, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Er...I've been wondering that myself. In my opinion, there should be a place in the part infobox for the element ID.
- And where does that go? –Agent Charge 06:26, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe so.
- The element IDs? Are those the numbers at the end of the building instructions? –Agent Charge 00:25, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- What would make you support? –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
- Comments