Part 53450

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki


  • Nominated by:Agent Charge 22:14, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It meets the criteria, and it stands out from most Class 2 articles. It has several pictures from different angles and a very thorough description.

Vote score: +2, Technical Check: Not OK

Support
  1. Stormbringer Empire791 (talk) 23:33, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Crown Knights.png I don't like the idea of C1 part articles, but I must admit this one is head and shoulders above the rest. User:Cligra/Sig
  3. Crown Knights.png I've fixed what Berrybrick brought up. It looks good to me. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  4. Crown Knights.png Looks good. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:05, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Object
  1. Crown Knights.png Weak Oppose I would support if that image of the golden helmet was not from LDD. Berrybrick 10:23, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
    My golden viking helmet broke, so that's why I didn't have a photo of it. (Thanks Jeyo) –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Crown Knights.png Per Berrybrick (apart from the would support part) Personally I'd also like to see a list of element ID's for this article, it is meant to be the absolute best it can be to be a c1 after all. Honestly I thought this was a part of the infobox, but it looks like it got removed early on :S Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 23:09, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
    What would make you support? –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
    The element IDs? Are those the numbers at the end of the building instructions? –Agent Charge 00:25, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    Yes, I believe so. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
    And where does that go? –Agent Charge 06:26, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    Er...I've been wondering that myself. In my opinion, there should be a place in the part infobox for the element ID. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:28, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    There was when the template was first created, then it got removed a day or so after its creation :S Should I add it back in? NovaHawk 06:54, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    Yes, I think so. Then we'd get to update all the part articles along with the idea KoN introduced! :D Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
Comments