Part 53450

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki


  • Nominated by:Agent Charge 22:14, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It meets the criteria, and it stands out from most Class 2 articles. It has several pictures from different angles and a very thorough description.

Vote score: +4, Technical Check: OK

Support
  1. Stormbringer Empire791 (talk) 23:33, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Crown Knights.png I don't like the idea of C1 part articles, but I must admit this one is head and shoulders above the rest. User:Cligra/Sig
  3. Crown Knights.png I've fixed what Berrybrick brought up. It looks good to me. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  4. Crown Knights.png Looks good. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:05, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Crown Knights.png Though I do think what NBS mentioned should be fixed, it isn't actually in the MoS (as far as I know). Berrybrick 20:49, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Object
Crown Knights.png Weak Oppose I would support if that image of the golden helmet was not from LDD. Berrybrick 10:23, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
My golden viking helmet broke, so that's why I didn't have a photo of it. (Thanks Jeyo) –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
Crown Knights.png Per Berrybrick (apart from the would support part) Personally I'd also like to see a list of element ID's for this article, it is meant to be the absolute best it can be to be a c1 after all. Honestly I thought this was a part of the infobox, but it looks like it got removed early on :S Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 23:09, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
What would make you support? –Agent Charge 22:57, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
The element IDs? Are those the numbers at the end of the building instructions? –Agent Charge 00:25, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I believe so. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
And where does that go? –Agent Charge 06:26, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Er...I've been wondering that myself. In my opinion, there should be a place in the part infobox for the element ID. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:28, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
There was when the template was first created, then it got removed a day or so after its creation :S Should I add it back in? NovaHawk 06:54, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I think so. Then we'd get to update all the part articles along with the idea KoN introduced! :D Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
Yay, lots of fun! :D Added in the Element ID parameter, will have to check with the codemaster about how to get it so both show buttons don't show both hidden divs, but it's close enough for now. @The article- corrected years field (only had 2005 listed), correct name of gold colour, added in the two Element IDs I could find, unable to find the silver one. NovaHawk 23:37, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
Comments
  • What's with the note? According to the article, there are no black helmets... NovaHawk 23:39, October 23, 2012 (UTC)