Shortcut: BP:CLASS2 BP:CAP

This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.

Requirements

Complete articles must...

...comply with the manual of style completely.
...have their infoboxes filled out as best as possible.
...have a small lead section that describes the basic infos of the subject like release year, theme, rough overview of the content.
...have a paragraph that describes the subject in greater detail (only if necessary; small sets that contain just small simple models may not need such a section).
...have an external links section (sets only)/appearances section (minifigures only)/a complete set list (themes only).
...must not be tagged with any maintenance templates such as {{redbricks}} or {{brickify}}.

How to nominate:

First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Class 2 status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
A member of the Quality Check Group will then review the article for completeness and either approve ({{Done}}, ) or reject ({{Not Done}}, ) it, supplying reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
The nomination will be removed three days after being reviewed, giving the nominator enough time to see the verdict. In case of rejection he may nominate the article once again after the reason for rejection has been addressed.

To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] == *'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~ *'''Nomination comments:''' ;Verdict

All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed.

Proposals

Clone Trooper

Nomination comments:

it is definitely class 2 this time

verdict

Not Done. I'd say there needs to be a description of the basic minifigure... Background is fine, but it needs to describe the physical attributes of the minifigure. User:Fudgepie/sig 01:43, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

The Penguin

Nominated by: Berrybrick _talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 22:18, August 26, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: It was just upgraded to C3, but that was while there were "Too Many Red Bricks" Berrybrick _talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you.

Verdict

Done. User:Fudgepie/sig 15:52, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker

'Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 04:36, September 17, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

Not Done. Same reasons as Leia's nom below. NovaHawk 04:48, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Leia Organa

Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 02:10, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination Comments This article is rated class 4. I think it should be class 2 or at least class 3.
Verdict

Not Done. Defintiely not Class 2 material- the most obvious reason being that there is no description section. Class 3, maybe, I'd say it's bordering between Class 3 and 4. NovaHawk 04:22, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Batman (Minifigure)

Nominated by: Berrybrick _talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 00:36, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Has recently been updated with Videogame content.

Verdict

Done. nominate yourself for QCG pls User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:20, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

7782 The Batwing: The Joker's Aerial Assault

Nominated by:--Munchman14 02:26, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments:A page I've been wanting to expand for a while and I finally have. It meets all requirements nicely.

Verdict

Done. NovaHawk 02:30, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Alien Cyborg

Nominated by:--Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin _talk 07:42, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I think It's c2. Best AC Character page.

Verdict

~~{{Not done|Uses CG image in infobox, should be a photo of the actual minifigure. Other than that, neutral I guess NovaHawk 08:00, October 14, 2011 (UTC)}}~~

Is that really a valid oppose? User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 16:50, October 14, 2011 (UTC)

What? CG pics look good. It says no where on Brickipedia policy that It can't be CGI or CG. I reckon It should be Class 2. --Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin _talk 00:27, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

this is the line I'm thinking of, but I can't find it in any policy page... I'm sure it was voted on though. I'll keep looking. NovaHawk 01:06, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral- I just think it could do with a little bit of expanding NovaHawk 01:37, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

So It's good to go? --Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin _talk 02:18, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

No, neutral doesn't mean yes. Just that another QCG member should judge it as I can't decide either way. NovaHawk 02:50, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

I'm Neutral too. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Not Done. I'd like to see more in the "description" section, such as the parts used to create the minifigure (, incorperated into the article, not in a list) and some background, such as the planted he came from and his rank in the invasion. --Berrybrick (Talk)

Alien Commander (Alien Conquest)

Nominated by:--Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin _talk 07:42, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Good article. Same reason as Alien Cyborg.

Verdict

Not Done. not all accessories listed in infobox. Other than that, neutral- but I just feel the description could do with a little more expansion NovaHawk 01:37, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Zane

Nominated by: Have a Very Perry Christmas and a (gyryryryryr) New Year! 23:14, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I think this has everything correct for the article to be class 2, but what do you think?

Verdict

Done. Seems good User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 23:57, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Contested NovaHawk 01:30, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

6860 The Batcave

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 07:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: This article has ALL needed sections that the MoS states: description, notes, gallery, etc. Also, the description of the product is quite substantial. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 07:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Verdict

Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Part 08010bc02

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 20:53, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Has all the requirements for a complete part article.

Verdict

Not Done. Needs a gallery, I think. User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 20:55, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Why is it not done? Then why do articles like this and much more don't have galleries and they're c2's. The article seems c2 to me - the MoS states that Part articles don't need galleries. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:02, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
(link) User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:04, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Done. Looks fine to me. Why would it need a gallery?User:Cligra/Sig

I thought it did. I guess that's only with multiple colors. And about that sticker sheet, it was rated before we implemented the galleries. User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 21:13, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

7145 Von Nebula

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:14, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Complete.

Verdict

Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

7147 XPlode

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:17, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Complete.

Verdict

Not Done. Needs a bit more info, especially, in the description. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Part 6053c01

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 03:32, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Complete.

Verdict

Not Done. Made it class 3. Needs a description, but otherwise good. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Ok. But why is this part article, and many more, have basic descriptions, and they're c2s? User:Zaersk/sigcodes 17:50, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
And this. :) User:Zaersk/sigcodes 17:50, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Because someone made them like that. We were going to have a new part MoS. I'm gonna start a forum after this :/ User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
Alright. :) User:Zaersk/sigcodes 18:01, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Part 3308px1

Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 17:22, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Complete.

Verdict

Not Done. Made it class 3. Needs a description, but otherwise good. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

I added a longer description, I'd like to re-nominate it for class 2. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 18:12, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Han Solo

Nominated by: Agent Swipe^(talk) 02:20, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Seems good enough

Verdict

Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

..... Strongly contested (there's not even a description) NovaHawk 22:23, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

4528 Green Lantern

Nominated by: King of Nynrah ^Talk 18:02, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I added the background, detailed set description, notes, and even an inventory. I think this makes Class 2 now.

Verdict

It's very close, however it does need a little bit of a cleanup- no AU$ price in infobox, and inclusion of a LA $ price (which isn't one of the four MoS prices). Also getting rid of at least some of the gallery would be great, there are a few strange images in there, and captioning what's left (or integrating them into the article) NovaHawk 08:45, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

2011

Nominated by: User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:37, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Has most information.I'm not sure about Year pages when It comes to rating.

Verdict

I'm not going to rate it because I don't know how to myself, but I would be leaning towards not done due to the large number of redlinks. NovaHawk 08:45, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Proposals