Class 3

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
< Brickipedia:Articles for Rating
Revision as of 07:49, 27 February 2012 by NovaFlare (talk | contribs) ("place new nominations at the bottom" how hard is it?)
Featured articles - Featured Article Nominations - Content Improvement - Articles for Rating
Rating-3-glossy.png
Shortcut:
BP:CLASS3

This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 3 status. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant Class 3 status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a QCG member who either approves or rejects the proposal.


How to nominate:
  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Class 3 status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. A member of the Quality Check Group will then review the article for completeness and either approve ({{Done}}, 600px-Yes check.svg.png) or reject ({{Not Done}}, X mark.svg) it, supplying reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. The nomination will be removed three days after being reviewed, giving the nominator enough time to see the verdict. In case of rejection he may nominate the article once again after the reason for rejection has been addressed.
 To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] ==
*'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~
*'''Nomination comments:'''
;Verdict

All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed.

Proposals

Samukai

  • Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 00:10, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: it's a good article
verdict

Class 2 

User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:15, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Classic Star Wars

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. {{{1}}} Sure I guess, why not? xD -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:20, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

4755 Knight Bus

  • Nominated by: JSquish 17:50, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 10:19, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


2536 Jetski/2871 Diver and Shark

  • Nominated by: GG 360Gamegear.jpg 16:14, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: These are the two smallest Divers sets, and I think that they both are better than rank 4 articles. Might even be rank 2.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 10:20, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


TECHNIC

  • Nominated by: FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:41, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I've done a lot of cleanup work on this article to improve its status. It needs a bit of expansion and such, but I feel that it's ready for at least Class 3 now.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Needs expansion first. Almost, but not quite. User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 19:44, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

7840 Airport Action

  • Nominated by: Charge talk Go Briki! 02:43, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The article has a good description and I feel it's worth of Class 3.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. After having a read over and changing a few things, I have marked this as class 3. Just a few comments for next time; 'many things' is somewhat subjective, and should be changed. There is no need to mention the name of the article in the description, also. User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:48, September 29, 2011 (UTC)


7841 Helicopter Rescue Unit

  • Nominated by: Charge talk Go Briki! 02:43, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The article has a good description and I feel it's worth of Class 3.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Just! User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


7709 Sentai Fortress

  • Nominated by:--Munchman14Dino Attack 17:05, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Better than the average set.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


TECHNIC (2nd nom)

  • Nominated by: FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:53, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The Components section has been expanded, and the article is complete and almost entirely MoS-compliant :)
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Looking good NovaHawk 23:14, October 4, 2011 (UTC)


Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu

  • Nominated by:--Munchman14Dino Attack 22:55, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A good page on the TV special.
Verdict

? It already is Class 3... NovaHawk 22:57, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Really sorry about that. :)--Munchman14Dino Attack 23:03, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

  • No worries :D NovaHawk 23:14, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
    • (note- to anyone reading, the above conversation was in relation to the title being different) It might be better for someone else to rate this who's seen the movie (and I don't have time to take a good look at it right now) NovaHawk 23:18, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Saesee Tiin

  • Nominated by:-- Sir Penguin! 23:30, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Surely better than c4?
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. No description at all, I think at least some sort of description should be present to be c3- that is what should be the focus of the article after all. NovaHawk 00:02, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Done a Description section. Hope it helps. -- Sir Penguin! 00:06, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

7782 The Batwing: The Joker's Aerial Assault

  • Nominated by:--Munchman14Dino Attack 00:25, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My current project, so there's still some work left to do in the description, but I believe it's at least rank 3.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. {{{1}}}


-Now that it has somthing on the helicopter, I'm fine with it --Berrybrick (Talk) | (Con.) 22:59, October 7, 2011 (UTC)


Saesee Tiin

Verdict
  • Not going to say no, but description should be above the background, and the description needs its spelling checked. Might qualify for c3, I don't know, but definitely not c2. NovaHawk 08:03, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, it's entirely up to you, but usually people have a slightly better track record than you currently have with nominating articles for their noms to be successful NovaHawk 08:29, October 14, 2011 (UTC)


Dragon Masters

  • Nominated by: Crazed Penguin
  • Nomination comments: Better than C4
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. This is already an FA, I believe. -User:Cligra/Sig

It's a different page Cligra...Fail...CP
600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. ......OOPS.....

-User:Cligra/Sig

Lol. CP

9494 Anakin's Jedi Interceptor

  • Nominated by: User:Crazed Penguin/100DaySig 00:49, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Has enouh info for me. Not sure completely though.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. good for c4 only User:Fudgepie/sig 23:13, December 14, 2011 (UTC)


Bunny Suit Guy

  • Nominated by: Crazed Penguin
  • Nomination comments: Good enough, At least, I think.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Crown Knights.png I don't know, I think it belongs at c4. QCG: feel free to override, I really can't tell the difference too well between 3 and 4. NovaHawk 01:20, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Class 4 is up to 3 Sentances and not overly filled. Class 3 has Description and Background filled as best. User:Crazed Penguin/100DaySig
And where did you pull that from? NovaHawk 01:31, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
I know I'm not a QCG ember but I know for a fact that this is Class 4 not Class 3. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:20, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not Done. Crown Knights.png Not too good grammar... User:Captain Jag/sig1 06:38, November 3, 2011 (UTC)


Black Falcons

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. The Grammar isn't perfect, but there is a bit if leniency with c3, and there is enough other content. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


Leprechaun

Nomination comments: It has more then a five sentence descriptio has the quote and a good intro. I thinkm this is ready for Class 3.

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Yeah. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


Harry Potter (Theme)

  • Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 12:46, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: it's a good article
verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Not bad. User:Cligra/Sig


10223 Kingdoms Joust

  • Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:24, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Class 3 ready.
Verdict

done 

User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:37, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

7140 X-Wing Fighter

  • Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 18:04, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Class 3 ready.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. NBP. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


8762 Toa Iruini

  • Nominated by: Agent Rhodes 03:22, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This article contains description on the character's history, traits, and team. It includes notes, references, Official Lego.com description, and enough gallery pics to show the character. This article could use some work (as most could), but I don't think that it should be a Class-4 article.
Verdict
  • No description of the set itself. To me, very borderline, I'll leave it to someone else to decide. NovaHawk 03:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Skales

  • Nominated by ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂
  • Nomination Comments I've done considerable work on this page and think it's ready for class 3 status.

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Very nice! User:Cligra/Sig


System i Leg

  • Nominated by: User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:35, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I think It's a classic Class 3 article. Has info but not overly up to MOS.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. (feel free to override me anyone, I'm not too confident) Basically, it's just a list with no actual detail NovaHawk 22:00, January 17, 2012 (UTC)


Saesee Tiin

  • Nominated by: User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:39, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Had expansion recently and looks good. Not perfect but C3 Style
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Description has three sentences, but at a quick glance I spotted two spelling/grammar mistakes. Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 22:00, January 17, 2012 (UTC)


Bunny Suit Guy

Verdict
  • Seems pretty borderline to me (no verdict) NovaHawk 22:00, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

9494 Anakin's Jedi Interceptor

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 22:00, January 17, 2012 (UTC)


Lightning McQueen

  • Nominated by: Charge talk Go Briki! 07:41, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It has a lot of information, Background, Description, Gallery of Variants, etc. Seems worth of Class 3 at least.

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Definitely User:Cligra/Sig


8961 Crystal Sweeper

Verdict

Vladek

  • Nominated By ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂
  • Nomination Comments I think it's a good article. Better than class 4.

Oscar

Verdict

Blacktron

  • Nominated by: -Power Jim 07:38, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I think this article should at very least be a class 3 article. It certainly shouldn't be classed as a class 4 article anymore.
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Articles_for_Rating/Class_3&oldid=696289"
... more about "Articles for Rating/Class 3"
RDF feed
Has parent pageThis property is a special property in this wiki.
Brickipedia:Articles for Rating +