1
Contents
Review team
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nothing done
Seeing how the QCG is dead, half of users in it haven't wrote a review since the merge, I think we should do a review team. I think this is a necessary idea to revive the review sub site. I think the reviews of this team should be featured on the homepage similar to what brickset does. But I don't know some things: should it only include admins or be treated like the news reporter group, should there be creative freedom or a guideline. Anyway I think if the site works together I'm sure we can get over a hundred reviews within a year. Also small sets take short time to review and we allow reviews for collectible minifigures and pollybags so everyone can join without hassle or bankruptcy. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3
Notes
|
Categories on figure articles
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done
I use Disney wikia for one reason only, the categories! See them at the bottom of the page, categories such as "Spouses", "Females", "Heronies", "Pet owners", "Protaganists". I think categories such as these and more (species, figure type, hair colour, age group, eye colour, skin colour)could make us a really useful tool for people gathering information. Example
On a note, in terms of use, a category like "minifigures released in 2012" including not just new minifigures but old ones as well would be more useful (although you could make them separate categories obviously) CJC95 (talk) 11:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Scrap ratings?
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was change as per 4th last comment
This is just sad. We have someone who spent hours making this article, then putting it up for nomination. In the 15 days since it was created, after the nominator going around to about 10 people's talk pages who knows how many on chat, we've had:
I'm not "blaming anyone" in particular, this is just a sad reflection of the general lack of caring/enthusiasm that this wiki seems to love. There were a couple of articles I had lined up to get to at least c2 status (writing them offline since I have limited internet at the moment). After seeing this, I just can't be bothered. But, back to the topic- is there a point in even having ratings anymore? If there are only two people who seem to be bothered looking at noms like this, there's no way an FA's going to reach +5, even GA's reaching +3 seems unlikely. So why have them at all? NovaHawk 23:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Countries
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was do not have
I did a nationalities thing ages ago (that involved speculation) but here's a somewhat different idea. Country pages! Here's an example for Ireland, besides the stuff included on that page we could add a list of LEGO stores, sets based in that country. Thoughts? Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3
I'm indifferent. For one part, it would be a new interesting concept and would also help differentiate us from Wikia. But of course, there's not enough information for us to put in a page for every country. --Knight
Vote
|
Category structure for inventories
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done
Because stuff is annoying me in Category:Star Wars minifigures (essentially every minifigure is listed twice- eg, Darth Vader is followed by Inventory:Darth Vader), I thought I'd propose a category structure for inventories, where inventories are separate from categories for other things which aren't inventories. Here's the proposed structure:
? Basically it's pretty much the same as what we seem to have except for the inventories are grouped by a theme category of their own instead of using categories which have traditionally been used for mainspace articles NovaHawk 11:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
{{{content}}} |
Reference photos
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was allow
Do we want/need to add reference photos on are articles? So far only the minecraft figures have them. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3
Has this not recieved enough yeses to be approved? Soupperson1 Jeepers! |
Colours
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Allow unofficial names
I think we need to vote on this: Do we use LEGO's colour name e.g. Bright Purple, the scientific colour name Barbie pink, the name lego characters refer it as raspberry or just what people refer it as "pink" —Unsigned comment by Soupperson1 (talk • contribs).
I actually ment referring to colours on pages, I need to explain things better :P Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3
Vote
|
People Pages: the people page section to end all people page sections
Please note- this discussion is closed, and will be written up and archived within 24 hours of 10:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC). The rest of the discussion can be found at Brickipedia:Featured_Forum/old.
- We've had a few forums on this already, but nothing's getting decided. So I'll set up a forum with straight votes, and go through them step by step.
Section 1: Who to have articles on
The first thing is- what articles on real-life people should we have on the wiki? Feel free to add other sections for other types of people if you can think of any NovaHawk 06:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Certified Master Builders
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was allow
|
Members of the LEGO Ambassador Program
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was do not have
|
Writers/Illustrators
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was those contracted to write original stories only
Including writers/artists of comic books, novels, reference material (visual dictionaries), etc.
(see ToaMeiko's comment below for what this section means)
|
Composers
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was have
For people who write songs for LEGO productions.
|
Singers/Musicians
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was allow
For people who perform songs for LEGO productions.
|
LEGO Community Team
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was allow
While they aren't a part of LEGO's management and don't contribute directly to the products, LEGO's community team (also known as CEE) is arguably the most important department of the LEGO for its fans. CEE is responsible for the LEGO Ambassador Network, fan event support, convention support, LUG support, and interacting with in-person and online LEGO User Groups (such as Brickipedia). Should we have articles for regional community team leaders?
Then there are some other parts of the community team that aren't part of CEE, such as Peter Espersen, who heads ReBrick and any other co-creation projects run by TLG, Tim Courtney, who is head of LEGO Ideas, etc.
|
Section 3: Anything else?
For anything else not covered in the MoS or what characters to have.
Ordering of items in {{ListOfWorks}}
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was chronologically
|