Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
Revision as of 22:28, 27 October 2012 by 1999bug (talk | contribs)

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.

If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests. 

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Neutral====
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

Shaddowwarrior016

Shaddowwarrior016 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Shaddow is a good member of the community, and is mature enough for these tools, and we need more mods on at the times he is on. User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator --User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. After talking with him on chat a few times and looking at his records, he seems fit for the job. And, like Czech said, we need more mods at the times he is on. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  3. Did some research... Supporting. User:Sonofhades101/signature 19:26, October 19, 2012 (UTC)LazerzSoH

Neutral

*(edit conflict, Clig :P) He's on at a time when no one else is, that's why nobody here knows him. I've talked with him a few times, but don't know him well enough to support. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted via chat --User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • What time of day is he usually on? Because he seems to have a lot of edits, but, according to the "Neutral" section, not many people know him. If it's at a time when nobody's on, this might continue to be the case and no progress would be made on the matter.--75.152.174.102 18:08, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Korpuffin

Korppufin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 90 mainspace)

I got expirience with spammers like tanselous,and i can easy make them leave. But i dont have a better way saying why i should get nominated.But i am active at chat when there is not mutch nominated people as a watcher. User:Sonofhades101/signature 16:49, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. No description of why and Koppufins's an ok user but I don't trust him enough/see him having a need for this right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Not on chat enough to know for sure. I don't know if as you put it, "changed".
  3. He's a good person, but he's not someone that has too many experiences in others spamming. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  4. Not on chat enough to know for sure. I don't know if as you put it, "changed".User:LazerzSoH/signature
  5. Per Clone gunner commander Jedi. User:Irnakk/sig
  6. Per Irnakk (easier name to type). Berrybrick 18:50, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I'm actually opposing this one, because I think Korp isn't ready, and isn't exactly great at his English, though it is improving. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:42, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Awesomeknight1234

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Before any of you oppose, I hope you read this instead of coming up with an insignificant reason for doing so. Awesomeknight is a great friend and user who was one of our better mods when he had the rights. I'm sure some of you are confused as to why he had the rights removed, but honestly, it wasn't as big of a deal as it seemed. But I might as well explain why Knight had these rights removed, to keep this nomination legitimate.

  • A user (Whom I will be keeping anonymous, just in case.) was causing havoc and angering various users, which included Knight. Even I was being bothered by this user, on occasion. Although it continued, there wasn't much we could do as he wasn't personally attacking anyone directly or anything else ban-worthy. This was very confusing to us and it never ceased, simply dragging on.
  • Knight, not realizing the jeopardy it would cause, spammed the user's wiki with hate messages. Admittedly, he told me and I never even considered the risk he was taking. I don't wish to be blamed, but do take in account that he told multiple people who could have easily stopped him. I would also like to point out that this message is known as "The World's Worst Insult" (Not as bad as it sounds.) a well-known internet meme, not something he came up with to directly insult the user.
  • Although we are not supposed to take into account of users' actions on other wikis, the administrators thought this threat was a little much and somewhat ridiculous. I'm not trying to say their judgement was wrong, but maybe it would be better if it remains temporary and we let Knight regain his user rights.

So, if you think Knight deserves these rights, go ahead and support. If you don't, feel absolutely free to oppose. Or just stay neutral. Whichever way you choose, please consider the above. As far as I know, I didn't leave out any major details that could change your decision.

Knight supports this, but I am the one who is "nominating" him. If anything, don't shoot this down because you think he wanted me to do it. </textwall> User:1999bug/sig1 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:1999bug/sig1 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator&oldid=679640"