Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.

If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Neutral====
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

SuperSpyX

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (22 edits, 1,977 mainspace)

From the urgings of several users I have decided to request Chat Mod rights again. I now act more mature and am nicer to new users. (Even Berry said I was doing better.) I have a good understanding of the new chat rules and would use them well. I am on chat quite a bit, (though a little less recently) sometimes when no mods are on. I hope you will consider my request and leave feedback and advice below.

User:SuperSpyX/Sig3 22:54, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Support

1. NovaHawk 23:04, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
2. Sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:54, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
3. What is the worse that can happen? ~ CJC 20:23, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
4. If the above three have read all below and support, then I might as well. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Neutral

• You have been doing better, but I am not willing to support yet. That Aussie-stereotype episode was not long ago enough for me, aside from a few other things that I am not sure have changed, but no need to go into detail again. Berrybrick 23:28, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks...I guess. User:SuperSpyX/Sig3
    • It's not worth me getting angry over, but this is one of those "things". Berrybrick 00:01, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
      • I didn't mean that in a mean way. I'm sorry if you took it that way.
• He has been better lately, but I haven't seen him on chat enough to be sure either way. I'm leaning toward support, though. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:04, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
• Per Jeyo. User:Legoboy9373/sig 08:25, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
• Pretty much per Jeyo. I really haven't been on enough to know if he's been doing well enough. Drewlzoo
• He was sexist once or twice to my friend recentley, if he stops i'll support, or if it was just a one time kinda thing Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
• Per Jeyo. User:Irnakk/sig

Oppose

1. Not a very good history - has been banned twice in the last 6 months for being racist, and has a bad habit of being a show-off, and is not very mature, especially not enough for this role. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

   Have you been on chat with him recently? He's been quite a bit better. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:21, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

   I have, and I see no major differences. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:24, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

   Fair enough. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

2. Per Czech, BB, and Soup. User:Cligra/Sig
3. He canvassed just to get users here and he hasn't been on his best behavior lately, either. User:1999bug/sig1 19:09, February 17, 2013 (UTC)