Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 1/Ariel

Articles for Rating → Class 1 article nominations → Archive → Ariel

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.

• Nominated by:Soupperson1 [[User:Soupperson1]] Have a Soupy day :) (talk) 22:01, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I think she has a perfect backround and her discription is preety good too(Sorry for spelling mistakes)

Vote score: -5, Technical Check: Currently Not OK

Support

Object

1. Where to begin? Conflicting data, it's an unreleased figure, tiny/bad quality image and written in a way that does not comply with the MoS. With a big cleanup, it might be c2, but as it is...no. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:45, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
2. Definitely not c1. User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:50, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
3. I'd love to see a C1 DUPLO article, but this isn't it. At least not now. Mostly per Jeyo, except as long as we know we have had a full view of a set/minifigure I'm not opposed to having a C1 article on a future subject. Berrybrick 23:28, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
4. I think must have been cleaned up now, I'm not seeing huge problems- is it good enough for c2? Definitely not c1 though, sorry. NovaHawk 23:46, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

   Yes, it was cleaned up in the last little while. It was even in the "Hot Spots" for a certain period of time.--50.99.253.184 23:54, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

   I would give it c2, if not for two things. The background (Isn't everything supposed to be in past tense) and the image (small and blurry). Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:13, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

5. I don't like the idea of articles being C1 before the they're released. –Agent Charge 05:47, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)

Comments

Not Done. SNOW closed. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:41, November 3, 2012 (UTC)