Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 1/Dementor

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.

  • Nominated by: User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • Nomination comments: Complies with the MoS, describes both variants, large background and gallery.

Vote score: ±0, Technical Check: Not OK[edit source]

Support
Object
  1. Crown Knights.png The description could do with some small expansion (I know there isn't a lot to add) and the background, as NBS said, is quite a mess. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:05, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
  1. Crown Knights.png Needs a VG section, background needs a tense change NovaHawk 04:00, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
    Actually, the background's a bit of a mess in general (spelling, and it's all over the place) NovaHawk 04:02, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
    ^ I was about to say something along those lines. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:05, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Crown Knights.png The background is also missing a lot of data and is not written very well. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 07:02, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Fixed Background and added Video Games Section. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • I think it should be good now, I enlarged the Description by much. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • Neutral I may bandwagon later, but I am not sure now. The description is not exactly at the level I like it, close enough for me to overlook it though. The background, however, though it seems good I was unable to get through it because I see it as nothing but a textwall. Aside from that, I am not so sure of the video games section is correct. I thought that they had a more hybrid appearance 5-7. Berrybrick 20:15, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • For the description, I understand what you mean, however, there isn't much to add. For the background, (thank you for reporting that) I'll see if I can summarize it down to the main parts or change it somehow. For the videogame section, I also am not sure, so I'll check on that. Thanks, User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • I would say C2. klagoer 13:56, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Been fixed up since past months, approved for c2. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:57, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Undone! The opposes remain, as do their reasons. :P -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:28, August 8, 2013 (UTC)
None of these votes are relevant at this point, should we open up a new vote? -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:40, August 9, 2013 (UTC)
They seem quite valid to me...did you read the background? -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:34, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not Done. The issues brought up have not been fixed and it's been quite some time. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 09:28, September 4, 2013 (UTC)