Brickipedia:Forum/Class 1 article re-evaluation

Brickipedia underwent a restructuring of its article ratings, and the Class 1 (Good) status has been removed. The following page is for deciding which rating each of our current Class 1 articles should be moved to. The article's rating will be changed after a consensus is reached.

4206 Recycling Truck

Vote score: +1 FA, +2 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

1. I don't know if this is something readers would really be interested in, but it's a good article. Berrybrick (talk) 01:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Demote to Complete article

1. Not sure if it's FA worthy, but not against it becoming FA (more a CA or higher vote). If it is FA, the images in the gallery should be captioned, but I don't really know what those guys are doing with the wheelbarrow so I didn't caption it :P NovaHawk 10:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
2. The background seems out of universe, but the description is great. I'm torn, but as for now I'll side with Nova. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

1. Neutral LegoFan4000 ^talk 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Wonder Woman

Vote score: +1 FA, +0 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

1. I think it's pretty good, I'm kind of iffy on the dawn of justice description but I think the rest is fine. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to Complete article

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

• Haven't read through it yet but at a glance the background's kinda all over the place- first it goes comic books, then LEGO universe #1, LEGO universe #2 then back to DCEU NovaHawk 11:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

• I haven't even looked at the page yet, but isn't that what normally happens? :P Berrybrick (talk) 15:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

• Nuetural LegoFan4000 ^talk 21:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

5969 Squidman Escape

Vote score: +0 FA, +3 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 12:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
2. Berrybrick (talk) 15:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
3. For obvious reasons. :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

5980 Squidman's Pitstop

Vote score: +0 FA, +2 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 12:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
2. I think the description is lacking details and there's no background Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

• I'm thinking about this still. Maybe FA, but there are some quirks that would need to be cleaned then. Berrybrick (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

6074 Black Falcon's Fortress

Vote score: +0 FA, +3 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 12:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
2. Again, I like this one, but it has the same issues as King's Mountain Fortress and the description could be a little more in depth. Berrybrick (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
3. A one sentence background would look bizarre for a FA :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

6081 King's Mountain Fortress

Vote score: +0 FA, +3 CA, +0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 12:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
2. I almost want to vote featured--I actually like the description of this one--but the background might be better not existing (I wonder if Jamesster would know of any sources to improve it?) and it could use some general cleanup, but that would be easily manageable. Berrybrick (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
3. A one sentence background would look bizarre for a FA :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments