Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship/Archive3

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

1999bug[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Bug has now been an active user on this wiki for nearly two years, and he's quickly gained a lot of maturity during this time. He's a very active chat moderator, forum member, and blog user. He would be a great help with keeping away spam, making sure everything is going smoothly, and that everyone is following our policies. Drewlzoo 20:58, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination, Drew and hello to anyone reading this.
As stated above, I am an extremely active user who has been here for almost two years. I'm not the most avid editor to the wiki, but I tend to pace myself and look for information that is definitely needed and not excess. Sure, I may not be the best editor but I am extremely involved with the community and I'd be willing to partake in nearly anything if it meant the satisfaction of my fellow Brickipedians, whom I consider friends. My involvement with the wiki is key and my lack of edits may be an issue, but do recall that I know how things work.
Being a moderator and patroller has confronted me with plenty of issues over the course of time I've had the rights; Spammers and vandals are nothing new to me, I've confronted them numerous times. I might not be the first to find an issue on a page, but that doesn't mean I won't take action if I do.
My main issue is my mentality, I feel like the rights should come to me, not the other way around. If this nomination fails, I'll just wait for the day that I need the rights for the sake of the wiki. If this nomination does pass, then I will definitely use the rights to the wiki's advantage rather than my own and I'll be ready for any forthcoming issues as well as unforeseen ones.
Lastly, I'd like to thank all of you that have helped me get this far, I never imagined I'd actually be partaking in a nomination for administrative rights. Please feel free to leave an oppose or support, either way it is for the greater good of the wiki. Kind regards to all of you, - 1999bug - Contributions - Talk page

Support

  1. Drewlzoo
  2. Um, definitely. While he isn't really active in mainspace, he is mature and can protect against spam. User:Darth henry/Sig 21:16, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Drew. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
    #I guess. Good luck, Bug! :) --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 21:29, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  4. He's nice, kind, honest and really deserves the position! User:Legodude101/sig
  5. Per Darth and Legodude. User:Irnakk/sig
  6. User:LazerzSoH/signature
    Reason, or the vote will be struck. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
    You may want to read the current URR criteria at the top of the page- it clearly states a reason must be supplied for opposing, but there is no such rule listed for supporting. NovaHawk 06:46, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
    So I don't have to give a reason? I'm taking lessons from LSC, I am silent as a ninja. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  7. I'll support. 1999Bug is definitely mature enough for the job and he's been here for quite a while. My only concern is his low count of mainspace edits. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 16:00, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  8. While the low edit count does concern me a bit, I still believe that Bug is knowledgeable and mature enough for the job. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  9. Changed my mind, I do think that Bug has the potential. User:ErkelonJay/sig
  10. Truly been around long enough to deserve this right. May lack in some mainspace edits presently, but I have confidence Bug would make up for it soon. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:25, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  11. Phantabulous user. Support. Stormbringer Empire791 (talk) 01:36, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

# Bug is certainly one of the more level-headed users here and I have no doubt that he would be good at the job. However, his mainspace edits come around to below 400, a number that, in my opinion, should be quite a bit more before I support. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:31, February 6, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to oppose)

  1. I agree with Jeyo, sorry Bug. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  2. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

# I just came to edit a program glitch.. it's 8 support to 8 oppose, and I don't feel like tipping the scales yet, since I haven't been on for very long. User:ErkelonJay/sig

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but per Jeyo NovaHawk 22:01, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  2. A large amount of what an admin does is in the mainspace, and I'd want any user who could potentially be deleting content to know what good content is in the first place. Adminship definitely shouldn't be a reward for content work, but I'd like to see a broad understanding of Brickipedia before. As a side note for RfAs right now in general, what we will need on the new site is content creators, not admins. And what we could really use right now is someone or some people starting a centralized revamp of our policies - that isn't something that I'm going to start. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:08, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
    • Why does a user need to have multiple MS edits to get admin? I mean yes it is pretty important but not all important. Plus he wouldn't go around deleting stuff. I'm assuming he knows what's the difference from a good page and a bad page. He's been here forever. User:Darth henry/Sig 03:12, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
      • A user certainly doesn't need mainspace edits to become an admin, but when seeking a role which is primarily content control, I'd like to see lots of relevant experience. Like below, though, full support for him being an admin on the new customs wiki. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:32, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ^ klagoer 23:08, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Jeyo and Ajr, but when/if (I am assuming we are) we get separate admins for the customs namespace, I would definitely support that right away. Berrybrick 01:39, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
    ^ NovaHawk 01:54, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Bug is certainly one of the more level-headed users here and I have no doubt that he would be good at the job. However, his mainspace edits come around to below 400, a number that, in my opinion, should be quite a bit more before I support. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:31, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
    • ^This happened with my patroller request. We should really say the required edits need to be mainspace. This low mainspace edit problem happens too often. BrikkyyTalk
      • That's more of a common sense thing than anything, Brikky. --User:CzechMate/czech 08:11, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per ajr --User:CzechMate/czech 06:42, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
    #I remember he had some inappropriate userboxes on his page that I made him take down. I don't think that admins should have to be asked to do something like that. BrikkyyTalk
    • I'm sorry if this is too much to ask, but I think this oppose should be struck or at least changed. There was only one userbox and it only existed because I failed to notice it when transferring older userboxes onto my page. I willingly removed the userbox without even questioning you, so please don't act like I intended to offend you. It wasn't exactly inappropriate, either. The other opposes I respect, but this isn't a very valid reason for opposition. - Bug
      • Valid point. Struck. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:00, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
        • Unstruck - it is an incredibly nit-picky point, but it isn't an all-out attack or harassment or something which I would consider a valid reason to completely discredit and remove it. When closing this request, I (or another bureaucrat) am not going to consider it the difference between passing or not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:58, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
          • Re-struck (2 against 1 :P we should have a vote about a vote :D) Out of the hundreds (possibly thousands) of views on Bug's page durng the 18 months he had the userbox up, one single person was offended by it. And he wasn't "made" to remove it, he was asked to, and he did so, just because that one person was offended by it. The userbox wasn't racist/defamatory/some sort of personal attack in any way, so how is it a valid reason to oppose? NovaHawk 01:48, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
            • Just to clarify, I wasn't acting like you intended to offend you, I'm just saying an admin shouldn't have had to be asked to remove that, or even have that up there in the first place... --Brikkyy13 (talk) 07:03, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
            • Fair enough. I never like striking votes, though... and honestly, if we strike oppose votes like that, we should be striking all of the support votes too since they make no mention of what exactly would make him a good admin :P. Maybe a discussion for another day. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:56, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per Ajr. User:Legoboy9373/sig 08:22, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Sorry Bug. I really would've supported you, but these guys make good points. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 22:40, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Per ajr. ~ CJC 20:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Indeed. - Bug


Kingpinn2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawn

Kingpinn2 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 3 mainspace)

Hey guys. Yep, I'm running again. Last time was horrible, I admit I was bragging about myself. And I'm also sorry about an unrelated event, the whole "His name isn't Julien" thing. Turns out I was wrong. Next time something like this happens, I'll just kindly ask to change the name ounce. I'm also sorry for spaming the link to my blog in the comments, I'll never do that again. Aside from those things, I don't think I've done anything wrong. -Kingpinn2 (talk) 21:42, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Um, no. From what I've seen of him, Kingpinn hasn't had the previous experience of being a chat mod and he is often kicked for spamming links to his blogs. So, immaturity and no need for the rights. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:42, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  2. (Edit conflict) User is hardly active and edits rarely. I forgive him for the Julien thing, not that there was much wrong with it, but he still has not stopped advertising his blog on chat (and constantly, not just once or twice, more like once every few minutes it seems) though I have asked him not too several times. Per Jeyo too. Berrybrick 21:44, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Jeyo User:Darth henry/Sig 21:48, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per BB --User:CzechMate/czech 21:52, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  5. No idea who this user is. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  6. No reason for rights. ~ CJC 22:42, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per CJC. User:Legoboy9373/sig 09:12, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • @Berrybrick and Jeyo, I said in my description that I would stop spamming. Please forgive for the many times. -Kingpinn2 (talk) 21:50, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • I suppose that's why you just now, after making this nomination, posted a link to your blog on Charge's talk page? Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:51, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • You posted this request originally a couple days ago and it was removed for being in the wrong spot. You have been spamming in that time. You told me you would stop two days ago. I saw you do it about an hour ago. Berrybrick 21:54, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • I didn't know that counts as spam. Someone ounce told me to ask someone nicely. I'm sorry, again, and I will stop. -Kingpinn2 (talk) 22:01, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Jeyo (2)

Jeyo (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (119 edits, 4,065 mainspace)

Since Jeyo joined, he instantaneously became a great contributor to the wiki. He has nearly 4000 edits, he has and uses chat moderator rights responsibly. He is a great example to everyone he meets. He was CoTM in August, followed by BoTM in September. He edits constantly, every day. One of his last badges was "contribute to the wiki every day of 100 days".

He's dedicated, responsible, friendly, helpful, Those are just some of the reasons I would vote for him. Not only does he have all of these qualities, but he's a great friend to. User:Sonofhades101/signature 18:11, October 23, 2012 (UTC) User:LazerzSoH/signature

Support

  1. Instant support User:LazerzSoH/signature
  2. Brilliant, friendly, mature user and the best candidate for Admin on here, no doubt about it. He's the best non Admin on here (purely my opinion) and while I was sceptical of him when he first joined, he's now grown to be a great friend, I'll support him all the way to Adminship! :D (Yes this is me actually supporting a request) Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. Per Clone, possibly, I haven't really read past his first line. So, per Clone's first line at least... ~ CJC 19:36, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per Clone. There have been a couple of instances recently that he really should have had sysop rights for. :) 19:53, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  5. It's about time. User:Admiral Neo/sig
  6. Looks like I've been beaten to making the nom :) In my opinion, Jeyo's easily one of the most active and responsible users on here, and could definitely do with having these tools. As far as "needing experience" goes, I don't understand that point at all. Needs experience with what exactly? The only thing I can think of that Jeyo isn't experienced with on this wiki is blocking/protecting/deleting (ie, admin tools :S) NovaHawk 22:55, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  7. You 100% get my support! User:Legodude101/sig
  8. Pile-on support for a great candidate. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:10, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  9. Spectacular editor, he's been here long enough now. User:Cligra/Sig
  10. Always getting articles to C2 (and always nagging me to check them!) :P Just kidding. Jeyo is fully capable to take on the role of an admin and I feel he would do the job well. Keep up the great work!
    User:SKP4472/sig3 07:00, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
  11. He seems very trustworthy, very friendly to everyone not just a selected amount of users and best of all he is very hard working. He has my support. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:57, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
  12. Great user. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:45, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
  13. Yup Stormbringer Empire791 (talk) 19:31, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
  14. He'll be able to help out with these tools, and is definitely mature enough. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:33, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
  15. Per Czech. :) User:Legoboy9373/sig 16:16, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
  16. Legofan100 (talk)
  17. I was actually just going to ask him if I could nominate him, and saw that he was already! I don't think there's much of need to explain any further why he'd be a great admin. :) User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Neutral

  • He's a nice guy and all,but,I think he needs a little more experience. User:Irnakk/sig
  • Good editor, but per Irnakk. Leaning towards support though. I can't really come up with anything to improve on, other than maybe see more conflict resolution, but I could have easily missed that. Berrybrick 18:42, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's a great user, please don't take this wrong, but per everyone else, he hasn't been here even a year. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP

* I really want to support him, but as Irnakk said, he needs a little more experience. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:00, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

#Not ready for adminship yet, sorry, but I think you need more experience. Sorry again, Jeyo. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:07, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Well, in answer to Berrybrick and Irnakk, I think I have more experience here than it seems. I've encountered vandals, spammers, pages in need of deletion or protection and I've been subjected to personal attacks. I can put a "check" on every question on the checklist. I know how this wiki works and I rarely, if ever, lose my temper. I do think I could help out the wiki a lot by becoming an admin. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:01, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • And you have tons of F12 points, you're part of the special squad that grades the pages (Forgot the name), and you have done all the above... User:LazerzSoH/signature
  • I don't see how time spent here really matters. I got admin within 6 months, Cligra got it under a year, as no doubt many of our current admins did (I got bored of looking in the archives to find out.) Quality > Time. ~ CJC 14:33, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
I think I became an admin after about four months of dedicated editing... but then again I've made a good mess out of it :3
CJC is right, quality over time. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:35, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Funnily enough, every single person who has gone neutral or opposed on this page has actually been less active than Jeyo in the past few days. Just something to think about. User:Cligra/Sig 600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. NovaHawk 23:18, November 6, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Drew1200

Drew1200

Drew1200 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (486 edits, 3,793 mainspace)

Drew1200 has a load of mainspace edits, coding prow-ess and quite possibly the newest admin. A trusted user at LMBWM, and devoted editor to Wikia, and knows his way around coding, I'd be happy to give him sysop rights. Drew's Statement:
Since I became active again in January 2011, I’ve learned a lot from this place. It’s helped me to get a lot of self control, especially when I can’t control a situation, which I believe causes an increase in overall maturity. I’ve reverted over 165 cases of vandalism since I got rollback rights, and used my moderator rights well over a dozen times. In several of those cases, admin rights could have been used as well, so, I’m hoping to get them so I can simply have some more tools to fight bad guys that try to harm our wiki.

--User:CzechMate/czech 11:05, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator --User:CzechMate/czech 11:05, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Yes, he could use and deserves the rights. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  3. ^ User:Irnakk/sig2
  4. Mature and experienced User. Deserves the rights. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  5. Per above, although I also understand Clone and Cligra are saying too, I think he's got what it takes to be responsible with the rights of an Administrator. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 06:24, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
  6. I totally support. He's the one who asked me to join the wiki (over the LMBs) and has been here for a long time. He's always been a quality editor and has helped with many article sets (the online games set for one) ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂
  7. Support He could use them. Though I would like to see more activity. User:Darth henry/Sig 01:15, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
    Per LSC.


Jeyo[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not passed

Jeyo

Jeyo (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (119 edits, 4,065 mainspace)

I believe I could use these rights. I have over 2,000 edits and I (modestly) make good contributions. Never before have I been blocked, banned or kicked. I've encountered spammers and vandals and I think I could handle them better if I had the rights to do it. I realize some may think I don't have the experience or number of edits required for this role, but I'll give it a try.

Support

Oppose

  1. Just needs a bit more experience, and some more edits, and I'd support. --User:CzechMate/czech 03:13, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech. I would absolutely love to support him, but I just can't. User:1999bug/sig1 03:21, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech. Wait until six months at the very least. User:Cligra/Sig
  4. Per Bug. I am so torn, I want to support desparately, but I know it wouldn't be the right thing to do. Just wait a couple of months (5 or 6), keep editing, and keep a good attitude and you have my FULL support. User:Darth henry/Sig 04:07, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Darth :) User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  6. Per Darth :) User:Legoboy9373/sig 07:03, 9 August, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per all, need to get a bit more familiar with the wiki's systems and the users on Brickipedia. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 12:15, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  8. So good but not so much expierience. Wait at least 6-8 months and then I will support you fully. :) klagoer 15:01, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  9. Although the very small part of me which likes to try and get on and be nice to people feels bad about opposing and not going at least neutral, per Czech/Darth/Jim. ~ CJC 15:37, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  10. You're on the right track, but per others. Berrybrick 16:32, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  11. Sorry,per all. User:Irnakk/sig
  12. He's a great user and a great friend, but per all. User:Munchman14/sig
  13. More experience needed, sorry. User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:34, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I haven't seen the user enough yet to make a decision, but one thing I would like to point out is that 3.5 months is a very short time to be given adminship in. So experience. (if that even makes sense.) User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:15, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Neutral. I'd really like to support- yes, Jeyo hasn't been around for very long, but this user seems to make less mistakes than some users who have been around for a very long time, and seems to have caught on to the system here much quicker than most. The only thing holding me back from supporting is to do with the length of time- I'd just like to be certain that there's a good chance that Jeyo will be staying around for a while (which would be something that would seem more likely the longer they stay with us). Too many "admins" have disappeared right after getting adminship for me to not be a bit worried by that kind of thing for every nom. (Also, minor point, but some more forum participation might be good too, not heaps, but just every so often) NovaHawk 23:21, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per NBS. I'd LOVE to be able to support you, but I just can't. I'd trust you with the rights, but I think that you need a little more experience (only about 2 months though). I can't oppose either, so I have to be neutral. Agent Charge 07:41, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


Agent Fuse[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Passed, under condition that risk of removal if inactive.

Agent Fuse (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I have been on Brickipedia for nearly three years now. I have seen good editors come and go, and some bad ones as well. I dislike vandalism, and when I see it I revert it. So now (for the first time since February 2011) I am requesting adminship on our wiki.

I read through the checklist and this is what it said. Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made a few thousand contributions to articles here? Yes, I have. I have been here for almost three years (as I stated above) and I have made over eight thousand edits since I joined. Do you regularly participate on the forums? Uh…sort of. I have said some things on the forums recently, but I'm more of an editing person than a talking person on Brickipedia. Do you revert vandalism when you see it, or tag pages for deletion? Yes I do. I have reverted/deleted/rollbacked/removed over one hundred cases of vandalism, including tracking down at least one vandal spree. I also tag pages for deletion when I think they aren't needed, and if I don't know what to do, I ask. Are you bothered? I am bothered when I see pages with missing punctuation incorectly spelled wurds and small fixes needed. Yes. I am bothered. (Yes I know I'm breaking grammatical rules in this answer!)

So what do you think? Do I deserve the rights or not? (Don't answer that.) Though I would like you to all approve of my request, I hope you realise that I won't hold anything against you if you decide to oppose.

User:Agent Fuse/sig 01:02, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

—Agent Fuse

Support

  1. Mature and friendly. :) User:Irnakk/sig2
Please give a reason for your support. klagoer 17:29, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  1. I understand that you only get two hours a week, and I think that if you left for a year and came back, requesting rights, my answer would be different. But you are dedicated and sure to be able to benefit from these rights. So I supportUser:Sonofhades101/signature 22:14, August 16, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  2. Support Per CJC's below comment. User:Darth henry/Sig 23:24, August 16, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Sure, if you agree to give up the flag upon going inactive. User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:36, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
  4. 72% support. Can definitely be trusted with the tools. The only thing holding me back from fully supporting is the level of activity, but he has had periods of inactivity and always returned. And if he does permanently vanish off into the sunset like some of the other people have after getting admin rights, I can always ask Jag to hit him over the head or something :P NovaHawk 08:48, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per myself below. ~ CJC 19:00, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
  6. 72.4% support. I just don't really know him at all. I'm not really concerned about the amount of time he gets to come on here.

Oppose

  1. I'm wary of this user's activity, and I don't want an inactive/very very semi-active admin, sorry, but that's just me/ --User:CzechMate/czech 01:04, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Neutral for now- increase the amount of activity, and I may support. But, per Czech, I am wary of people with relatively little recent activity requesting adminship. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Per Cligra. ~ CJC 10:35, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Cligra. klagoer 15:37, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per all. User:Munchman14/sig 16:21, Auguast 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Cligra. User:Darth henry/Sig 17:28, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Is 'activity' the only problem with my request? I am trying to upgrade the level of activity on Brickipedia, but I only have two hours a week to work on Brickipedia, unless I can earn some more time. User:Agent Fuse/sig 08:44, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
    • If that is the case, its not so much a problem, its just we've had users who have been inactive, came back, request admin, we all go "I remember you, have admin", then they leave again. So, I'd support on a condition that if you go properly inactive within a few months of the request (not just like on holiday or what not), then you are fine with it possibly being removed. ~ CJC 09:25, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
      • Per the above, I'd go neutral for several reasons; I don't know the user that well, very semi-active and doesn't have too much need for the tools. I won't oppose him simply because this is an experienced user who not only hasn't ever done anything wrong, but also has made a fair amount of contributions made overtime. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 09:59, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
I personally understand that time may be an issue, but being an administrator is a commitment. If you really don't have the time for it, I don't know if you would be right for the position. User:Munchman14/sig
@CJC: I would agree to that proposal. @Munchman: It's not my choice to have that amount of time. My parents decided on it, and while I sometimes earn more, I think it is sufficient to keep up a good amount of edits. I had been using the time working on several LDD models, mostly the entry in the monthly MOC competition. User:Agent Fuse/sig 08:11, August 14, 2012 (UTC)
I'm his brother, and I can confirm he's not about to go inactive. User:Captain Jag/sig1 08:15, August 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • So this is ending today. As Cligra requested, I increased the amount of activity. CJC, Klagoer, Darth Henry and Munchman14, you said the same thing as Cligra. What do you think? Have I been active enough?

This time probably isn't a good time to request adminship, as everyone would have been competing in the Olympics and Celebration VI and wouldn't have time to look at this. But if you do, please say something. Something that I can do to make you support. {:) User:Agent Fuse/sig 08:43, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

    • I'd only support if you vow to be slightly more active an give me caek >:D --User:CzechMate/czech 08:51, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm neutral 100%. You're a very good user, but I just don't see a great need for the rights. Agent Charge 07:38, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


Bob Bricks[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Closed (see comment)

Bob Bricks

Bob Bricks (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Because he's my friend, a great helper to me and i bet a million other users, and to my wiki. Legofan100 (talk)

Support

Oppose

Comments

  • User does not meet minumum editcount requirements, closing. NovaHawk 11:36, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
  • Wow i never even knew about this, just found it -Template:W:BobSig/2012-


LSCStealthNinja[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

LSCStealthNinja (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

LSC has only been here for 6 or 7 months, but he's been a valuable member of the community and has edited a lot in mainspace, a kind friendly user, who has my total support for adminship. Let's go LSC! --User:CzechMate/czech 05:26, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator --User:CzechMate/czech 05:26, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I find this user quite awesome. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  3. Awesome and friendly user. User:Jiggy Santos/Sig
  4. I can see him with the rights! LMFS 04:53, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
  5. An awesome friend, very nice to all users, could certainly use the tools, definite support. User:Wertys761/sig
  6. Per Wertys' stance.--Munchman14 05:04, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
  7. GO LSC your an awesome friend User:NuffSaid1995/Sig

Oppose

  1. I have nothing at all against the user, but he's only just recently returned, I guess after GG360/Mykheh/whoever else, where they turn up shortly before getting admin rights then never being seen again, I'd like to see a bit more recent activity before requesting rights. Also, I may be wrong (there's a lot of people to keep track of), but I don't really remember seeing him a whole lot in forum participation, or doing maintenance things. NovaHawk 06:16, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
    I agree that I'm not very active on Forums, but I will be. I disagree on the Recent Activity though, as I'm on chat and editing every single night. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
    What I mean is you had zero edits between May 31 and June 9, and then from June 9-26. It looks like you said you'd be away on your userpage, which is completely fine of course, it's just that Mykheh was a away for a few weeks, then came back, lodged a successful request, then was never heard of again, and GG360 did something similar. I'm not saying at all you're doing the same thing, I'm just fed up with users turning up, getting their admin rights then fading out into the sunset. Basically, I'd rather see a more consistent run leading up to your request, but this is definitely only a very minor reason for opposing (despite the large amount of text I just wrote :/) NovaHawk 07:13, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
    Ahh.. Ok, I see what you mean. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  2. Nice friendly user, I just don't see them having a need for these rights, also per Nighthawk.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. Per both above. Sorry. Berrybrick 13:48, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Not ready and per above. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 14:27, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I'd (probably) fully support in, say, 8 months or more. As it is, wait a bit. User:Cligra/Sig
  6. I'm staying in the Middle RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    I'm pretty sure the "middle" is down one section :P --User:CzechMate/czech 05:13, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per NBS, I would support him after another two/three months if he keeps being active. Also I suggest you participate in the forums, so it looks like you know what you're doing. :P User:Darth henry/Sig 3 18:43, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Per NBS' reasons. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 11:53, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
  9. Per NBS Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 05:28, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Not sure if the user is ready. User:Irnakk/sig
  2. I'm staying in the Middle RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  3. I would fully trust him with the rights, but I want to get to know him better before I'd say that he's ready. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  4. The first part of Drew's sentence, coupled with the just got back thing NBS is on about and you get a semi-coherent sentence by me. ~ CJC 09:58, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • I've deleted the last part of my sentence, that was pretty stupid. :P Knowing me, the new one probably is too :P User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Comments

  • Accepted via chat --User:CzechMate/czech 05:26, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Considering that this was started at the end of June and it is now August, could somebody close this? Berrybrick 14:23, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
Closed. Clone gunner commander jedi talk


Clone gunner commander jedi (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Right well here goes... I have been on here for about one and a half years now, I'm very active, I have 18,747 edits and the number just goes up, I'm very experienced here, I know the rules, I know how to correctly use admin rights from the help of the various wiki's I have made, Blocking should be used as a last resort and you should always warn users if they do something wrong, deleting should only be used for deleting spam or inappropriate pages (we do get quite a bit of these), I know people will oppose because of the incidences that have happened in the past involving me but I think I have matured since then.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Support

  1. The best editor and information hunter around. Great at solving any kind of user dispute. From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 09:03, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  2. The only bad thing CGCJ has ever done wrong on here was one or two outbursts, but would be a great admin here. --User:CzechMate/czech 06:53, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Some troubling history, but honestly, could benefit from the tools and I think he'll be able to use them well. It's not that big of a deal. User:Ajraddatz/sig 07:08, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Yeah, he has had a few temper problems, but he works hard enough on the wiki to deserve admin rights. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:32, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Awesome User! I actually don't know why he was not an Admin before! User:Irnakk/sig2
  6. Only 1 and a half years!?! Lot's of edits... Full Support! I should add, what Zero said. Go CGCJ! User:Sonofhades101/signature
  7. Per Ajr. Berrybrick 13:10, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I have nominated this user several times and I regret not doing it this time. Our images of the admins have changed, we do think of them more of the side of being able to control us and dictating our every move. But it is just an extension to editing rights, and no one needs them more than Clone. He must of added half our images here, he gets us all new information and rarely stops editing. But apart from that, he's a great friend, he's mostly on chat and will always be ready to help new editors get started. He is my best friend on this wiki and probably the most deserving non admin of these rights. - Zero
  9. Per Zero, he is an excellent user! :D --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 14:56, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Clone or me? Ah I know you mean me :P - Zero
  10. one of our biggest contributors, on a lot. He can use the rights--Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 15:28, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  11. Looks like we'll be having a fresh batch of admins soon! -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 16:17, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Will we be cookies, or doughnuts? --User:CzechMate/czech 22:37, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  12. Per KoN. User:SKP4472/sig2 16:28, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  13. I'm honestly a bit wary of this, but it's worth a shot. User:Cligra/Sig
  14. Per Cligra and Zero. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 16:49, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  15. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 20:56, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  16. Being that he's proved that he's matured with his ChatMod rights, and seeing that my oppose would have absolutely no effect (:P) I'm going to support him. :) User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  17. βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ™ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ
  18. Why is he not an Admin already!? Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  19. Has been a great help. Really adds to the Bricki experience! User:Wertys761/sig

Oppose

Neutral

  • Has had issues in the past, but definitely a great contributor to the content here. Can't quite support though NovaHawk 00:53, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
I understand.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

Darth henry (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Darth henry (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (153 edits, 6,475 mainspace)

Darth henry has been here a long time, and has matured considerably. He can definitely be trusted with the tools, and we are in dire need of more active admins. The addition of the tools would be of great benefit to him, and he certainly has the potential to take over the world do good for the wiki with the abilities these rights would give him.
What Dh has to say:
I feel I have been here for a good bit and learned the ropes per say. I am confident I would not overstep my boundaries and would ask other admins before doing anything big. My personality would not change if this nomination passes, I would just become a bit more careful. My activity will just increase with these rights. Since my last nom I have realized that these rights don't make admins better than everyone else but instead are a tool box.

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Cligra/Sig
  2. OH YA --User:CzechMate/czech 05:10, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I agree, he really could help Brickipedia with these rights. User:Admiral Neo/sig
  4. Definatly! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 13:21, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Yes please. Great user who could benefit from the extra tools I suppose. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:47, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Sure sure. ~ CJC 14:51, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  7. ... He wasn't an admin? Ok, yes then. User:Sonofhades101/signature
  8. Per all. Jeyo 01:56, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  9. His experienced enough and is friendly. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 10:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Hells yeah From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:45, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  11. Yes he's cool!!!lol -Lego Whovian 10:53, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  12. As long as he doesn't start editing at the Building Bricks Wiki again, that made me question his dedication. :P Berrybrick 13:11, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  13. Per Berrybrick ;D -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 15:37, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  14. Per Berrybrick :L User:SKP4472/sig2 16:27, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  15. User:Irnakk/sig User:Irnakk/sig2
  16. βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ™ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ

Oppose

Neutral

Comments


CzechMate (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

CzechMate (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I've been here for a while now, I've grown old, and possessed many new talents on Bricki, and made many new friends. I've requested adminship because I'm very active, I do need to use the tools to delete, block users, close forums, give rights to respected users and so forth. I have good credentials, BoTM, CoTM, chat mod, patroller and rollbacker, aswell as a forum moderator. I've been told often by users that I'm very mature, and good at solving problems. I've changed a heck load since I joined, and I have learnt the ways of the wiki, and we are in need of more active admins, and I haven't missed a day for quite a long time. I hope you consider me as admin material. I have over 7,000 edits here, and I'm quite unhappy to say however, it doesn't include much mainspace, But I'm working on getting to my goal of 3,000 mainspace. Thanks - Czech

Support

  1. Penguan fur president! From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:50, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  2. The only real black spot on your record is your reaction after your last nom failed, after which you were a tad odd for a while. However, you got better. :P User:Cligra/Sig
    Ah yes, I remember that, I still feel stupid about it too. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:33, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Czech is friendly helpful, funny and nice. A great user to be around. He could also use the,tools for a few things --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 05:45, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
    Thanks Brick Bobby, it's nice to hear peopel liek me :) --User:CzechMate/czech 05:49, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Great mature user! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 13:22, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Now that all the strange stuff is over and the awkward drama, most definitely. My first choice for admin, actually :) -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 13:28, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Great friend and will be able to use these tools. 14:19, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  7. I've seen him doing many admin jobs, and taking the responsibilities of an admin. The only thing is that he doesn't have the rights. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  8. Erm... All of the above... I have heard a few power hungry accusations... And I say, so untrue! Full Support User:Sonofhades101/signature
  9. An awesome user, mature and could use the rights. Jeyo 22:26, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Awsome user trustful User man he should so be a admin! βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ™ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ
  11. All of that ^ and nice.717dif 01:26, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  12. I forgot to vote when I saw this earlier. Per everyone. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 01:43, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  13. Excellent user, will use tools wisely. (I was absolutely sure I already supported this. :P) --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 01:57, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  14. Definitely! -User:Power Jim/sigcode 10:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
  15. AWESOME USER!!!! User:Irnakk/sig2
  16. Personally I feel that this is too soon but he is a great user and friend, he will benefit greatly from these rights.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  17. Per CGCJ Berrybrick 13:11, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  18. Per Cligra and CGCJ. :) User:SKP4472/sig2 16:25, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  19. Still some major concerns about attitude, promising other people chatmod when he becomes an admin, etc. Ultimately, though, it's just adminship. Not that big of a deal, and we could always use more volunteers. User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:37, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Wait, I said that? I can't remember... --User:CzechMate/czech 22:17, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  20. He's a great friend and a great editor, he could use these rights well but per cliggeres - One
  21. βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ™ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ

Oppose

  1. (not that this vote matters at all, anyway) Not at all convinced that in the short time between his last nom, he's suddenly turned into a mature user. Haven't really had any problems with him lately (except for asking people for their age, which is against ToU), but I can't say I'd trust a user with admin rights after certain things they did around the time of their last nom, which wasn't that long ago. NovaHawk 00:47, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
    I know I was an idiot for what I did, but I did change a bit, and that whole ToU thing wasn't my fault, I was asked to do it for another user who knew them, who didn't want to ask, I'm sorry for anything else, --User:CzechMate/czech 00:50, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Meh. ~ CJC 16:36, June 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

Agent Charge

I spend most of the time I can helping make Brickipedia a better place. I am active regularly. I have never attacked another user, am friendly, and have only ever received one or two warning, which was/were over two years ago for the same thing, though I didn't know at that time that what I was doing was wrong, and when I was told, I stopped. I have never received one since. I revert vandalism every time I see it, and tag pages for deletion when needed. I regularly participate on forums, and I help other users when they need it. I am very frustrated a lot that I can't edit pages due to my user rights as a Brickipedian. This has happened so many times that I've loss count of them, but just to give a brief idea, it's been many thousands of times. In feel that I would make a great administrator on Brickipedia. Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 07:07, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. A relatively "quiet" user on the wiki, not that that's a necessarily bad thing. I do think a bit more participation in forums might be nice as per Cligra, and also per Cligra I have noticed longer periods of not editing. But, as Charge is a long-time user who's never none anything dodgy and made over 5000 edits to the mainspace, I think he can do with these tools. NovaHawk 07:19, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I agree with NBS. I would also like to see more forum contributions, but this user could use the tools for editing protected pages if nothing else. Per below, however, I would like some sort of inactivity clause. If you go inactive within a six month period of passing this request, your tools would be removed, and you could request them back without a big RfA should you return. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:53, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
    See comment to CzechMate below.
  3. I think he could delete bad pages and block bad people if nothing else. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 19:43, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Since he has seemingly agreed, thanks :) --User:CzechMate/czech 00:32, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Switching to support. MOC'ing is an acceptable reason for reduced activity (at least in my book. :P), and I see that you've made some forum contributions recently (keep it up!). I'm also quite impressed that you have been responding to comments and attempting to improve yourself... Great admin material! User:Cligra/Sig
  6. Per NBS. Keep up the good work Charge. User:SKP4472/sig2 05:33, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per NBS. ~ CJC 09:10, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Support. You are a good user. Per all. User:Evanf/Sig4

Neutral

  1. I haven't really seen you on here much.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. I'll change this to support if you edit forums more regularly, and can be as active as possible, as I've noticed gaps of several days in between some of your contributions. Aside from these factors, though, you'd have my support. User:Cligra/Sig
    CGCJ and Cligra, the reason why I haven't been all that active on Brickipedia lately is because I was building LEGO models on LDD for Brickipedia:Customs.
  3. Per others, I'd only support if you'd agree to lose the rights if you go inactive. --User:CzechMate/czech 08:03, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
    Ajr and CzechMate, inactive for how long? One week, no. two weeks, I doubt I would go inactive for that long, but if so, I'd agree to lose my user rights as an administrator. Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 23:13, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
    I was actually thinking if you went like a month without editing. Full support from me, then :) User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:48, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per all others. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 13:59, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I have been here a short while... and... well... never met or heard of you...User:Sonofhades101/signature
    Hi, I'm Agent Charge. Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 23:15, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
    Is "never met or heard of you" a valid reason to oppose? I'm not entirely sure. :/ User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

  • Has the... oh. :D One thing that (kind of) puts me off is 'rank' in your description. Adminship is not a rank, it is a toolbox. User:Captain Jag/sig1 07:26, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
    • I didn't mean 'rank' as in that administrators are better. 'User rights as a Brickipedian' Does that please you? Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 23:13, May 11, 2012 (UTC)


Awesomeknight1234[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done, due to canvassing

He is a mature, experienced user who defiantly deserves this. He has been here for awhile, he meets the requirements. He always helps people, and people like him :) That is why I am nominating him. He is just a great user who deserves this. User:Evanf/Sig

Support

Neutral

  • Although Knight is an excellent user, I must say, it is a big step from having only chat mod rights. I think it would be better to nominate hom for rollback rights. --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 21:31, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • He once told me he has no desire to become an admin. I also don't think he's that active on forums. He doesn't edit mainspace much either. --User:CzechMate/czech 21:44, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Czechmate. Needs mainspace and community activity. While I respect you greatly knight, you need to be active. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 21:50, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • Well, I'm active in the community. I'm not an editing person. But when I get this, if you really want me to, I'll get even more active in the community. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  • Per all. User:CM4S/Sig

Comments

Legosuperheroesfan[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done, closed early

I spend a lot of time on Brickipedia, and countless times, I see vandal pages I can't delete due to my rank. I have never received any warnings, and I am an honest and trustworthy user. I have never attacked another user, and spend a lot of time patrolling articles, blogs, and forums. I think I would make a good administrator.

Support

Neutral

  • Great user, but doesn't do too much in community and I personally think he needs a bit more experience, but I do see this passing in the future ;) --User:CzechMate/czech 11:14, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't know if there is an edit count or not, but if do, do you have enough? Also, I have never seen you make a single edit ever. So other than that, I don't know. Have you been very active lately? User:Sonofhades101/signature

Oppose

  • I actually think you could probably be an admin at some point in the future, but patience is a wonderful virtue.... User:Cligra/Sig
  • Only just about fit the criteria for admin nomination, also not too sure about users maturity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Per others, give it some time broski. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:10, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CGCJ. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 18:22, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Cligra and CGCJ. Agent Swipe(talk)
  • As I told you on your talk page, I actually don't have any trust issues, and you are pretty mature compared to some others. However, I don't feel that you contribute to forums or edit enough. And per Cligra, I can see this passing in the future if you edit more. Berrybrick 19:01, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • A bit early, just over edit cont and mainspace edit percentage is not that high --User:Brick bobby User talk: Brick bobby 19:03, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • This doesn't even deserve a response, if czech got so close and failed then this has no chance Prisinorzero 19:09, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Agent Swipe[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was withdrawn

Swipe HAS been here for a while, a very good user, who could benefit with these tools. He is nice and friendly too, lots of admin qualities in this user (more than me). They are very mature too. Swipe does know how to use these rights too.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • Maybe if he was more active- last real activity was March 23. NovaHawk 09:27, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
I agree fully, that is was my main concern when I accepted it. Agent Swipe(talk)

Comments

(Good, correct. :D) User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:54, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
So... Can we close this? Agent Swipe(talk)
Totally up to you, you can withdraw if you want (which is effectively a close) NovaHawk 01:46, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
Assumed above statement was a request for withdrawl, Swipe, please correct me if I'm wrong and I'll re-add it. NovaHawk 11:24, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

CzechMate[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Lately, CzechMate has made some good contribution to the wiki such as article, chat, forums, etc. He knows his way around and understands how to use the wiki well. I'm certain with how much experience and knowledge he has he can make a great Admin. I understand some users have had some disagreements and difficulty getting along Czechmate at times, but we can all say generally Czechmate is a friendly and dedicated user. So despite some minor mistakes, I think CzechMate is good enough to be an Administrator, I hope you all agree with me.

CzechMate's Statement: I'm moslty wanting the rights just because I get the ability to delete, redirect, block users when needed, and for changing Wiki Look. I understand how the rights work and understand the maturity needed. My credentials are pretty good, I have Patroller, Rollback and ChatMod rights, I am BOTM, Almost 70 Barnstars (But half of them are SPAM). I am on everyday, The last time I missed a day was early August. If I ever go inactive, I'd be happy to get my sysop flag removed. To put a stupid line: All Users say this but; I think I can benefit this wiki with extra tools. I'd just like to say thanks for all your support and stuff :P User:Crazed Penguin/spook


Support

  • As the nominator, I definitely think you should be an Admin CP. -User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • Most definitely --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:28, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great and friendly user, and I'm sure he'd be able to handle the tools. He did have some issues with a few members here on chat, but now that's cleared up he has my confidence. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 10:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
It's awesome getting support from KoN. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:25, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • great friend, helpful user --Brick bobby - It's a trap! 11:12, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah he is a great editor and I reckon is mature enough Prisinorzero 15:33, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Heck yeah! User:Dataman1/sig
  • What Dataman said. User:Evanf/Sig
  • Yes. He can benefit this wiki. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 15:55, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Full Support Per KoN. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • I was going to nominate you myself come October... Just remember that you cannot alter the wiki's look without prior agreement from other mods. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Just promise that you won't block NBP's old account to see what happens.... :P Berrybrick 16:16, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • A great and friendly user. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 19:06, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everybody above.--User:Jedi master sith/sig
  • Another slave of the wiki you say? Sounds good :D! In all honesty, I still have a few issues with this, but adminship truly isn't a big deal. I'm sure that Czechmate won't break anything, and will be able to help with some maintenance. User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:26, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
    I am really not impressed by the severe drop in maturity and understanding of Brickipedia that I've seen during this request. Striking my support. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:38, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm sure he will handle the tools well, and when he gets home from school, He is on for AGES!!! --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 22:32, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • you should be the admin because you are awesome and nice-(axs678)
  • why say no? he would be a awsome admin LETS GO Czechmate! Bob bricks
  • Support Excellent user, will use correctly and efficiently. --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 02:27, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Forget my Neutral below, Crazed Penguin is one of those people who are always happy. No matter the situation, even if it's stressful (like someone accusing him of something), he stands his ground, and speaks the truth. I admire people like this. Also, he isn't one of those people who goes crying for every little thing that happens to them (i.e something happened on chat, talk page, whatever.). We need more users like this guy. User:Skdhjf/SigT 05:32, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • You deserve to be admin --User:Legosoldier10/sig 08:55, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • He is not an admin already? Wow! Oh yeah! --WCDDoherty 16:48, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Agent Swipe(talk)
  • I support Czech Mate, because he has been on this wiki for a long time, and is dedicated. true ninjas eat pizza
  • KatenVaughn 02:15, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • XOfSpades I believe in you bro!
    • So your first edit just so happened to be on this page? I have a strange sense about this. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 00:00, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Most Definitely yes. -Lego Whovian 09:09, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great user, good editor. Ye! A'm actually still alive, everybody 12:00, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • On chat quite a lot, and seems very mature and sensible. Creeper S 12:14, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • I thought I said yes already... But the list is so long I can't tell. So Yes!!! User:Sonofhades101/signature
  • RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Neutral

  • *All of the above and all below...Sonofhades101 16:04, April 5, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  • Errr..... This is a difficult one, but, I will have to remain neutral for now. First of all, I believe CP is a great and friendly user and would be great for admin. But, there are small aspects of his maturity which need to be worked on. Also, I am not sure if he'd use the tools correctly, due to some recent actions displayed on various parts of the wiki. Please don't take this personal CP, you are a great user, and I wish the best of luck on this RfA. :) User:Skdhjf/SigT 16:56, April 5, 2012 (UTC) Changed vote to Support
  • you are nice and all so i say yes ........ And no. Are you sure your ready? ColeLovez Mintz
  • I have decided to move to neutral because I'm not quite sure rather than completely against. I striked my original. User:1999bug/sig1 23:02, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Exactly what Bug said, although I have realized that he has matured an amazing amount. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • While I think he's a great user I'm not sure if he's quite admin material yet ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂

Oppose

  • Nice friendly user but i just don't think that he is ready for admin yet maybe in a few months. We also don't need anymore admins at the moment.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • what clone said--Mr.Brick 11:21, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Really? Surely that reason is absolutely ungrounded. How does having another administrator (administrators are essentially just maintenance workers, by the way) hurt ANYONE? User:Cligra/Sig
  • I think it's odd that he had forums and blogs dedicated to how he banned someone for chat for no good reason and now he's up for admin. I don't mean to be picky, but this doesn't make any sense. Sorry, CP. User:1999bug/sig1 16:20, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • No. As NHL said, the recent incident just..no. He's sometimes immature, untrustworthy, takes blocking to an extreme, and so-forth, I don't think he'd make a good admin AT ALL. User:CM4S/MadSig
  • After, err, recent events, I have serious concerns about his ability to judge where blocks and warnings are approprite for users and also his maturity. NovaHawk 22:54, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
    • "I am very mature"? After what you did on your talk page yesterday, I beg to differ- that was by far one of the most immature things I've ever seen an established user do. NovaHawk 01:41, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per above MassiveSodaDuck's backup account =MSD 00:19, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Giving CGCJ a warning about Disneyworld/land or wha5 have you didn't really impress me. CM is a great friend that is truly amazing just the whole fact of that really doesn't give me a good feeling for the future. Also about one sixth of his edits are mainspace out of 6,00 something. I would like to see more mainspace edits. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 14:25, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'd have to agree with NHL. - CJC 18:37, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per others: Great user, but I'm unimpressed with some of the recent actions he's taken as a chat mod. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:10, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - What Nighthawk leader said, is true. I say, CzechMate should wait before getting these tools. I feel maybe he should mature a bit more- the admin rights aren't going anywhere... (Also, please don't take this into offense, CP. I am not trying to be mean. :)) User:Skdhjf/SigT 01:54, April 10, 2012 (UTC) Tat told me I could in a PM, He said he's leaving forever. He said didn't mind me striking/unstriking votes here. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 09:08, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

  • Yeah, after you PM'ed him pressuring him into changing his vote to support. According to him, at that point he told you you were canvassing, so then you annoyed him about changing it to neutral instead. Honestly, the underhanded things you've done in relation to this nom... advertising the page every five minutes in chats, users conveniently receiving gold bricks minutes after they vote for you, and I'm sure there hasn't been any other additional canvassing and deals going on in other PMs. It's amazing how users who haven't made a single edit to the wiki can suddenly decide to make their first edit, and it's on an admin nomination. How people think that this user has desirable admin qualities is way beyond me. NovaHawk 00:07, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
    • What had happened was: I was talking to Tat, I asked him, with no pressure why he opposed. I did a small joke, and said that. The XOfSpades guy I've talked to before, He asked me where this nom was, I linked him to it. I didn't ask him to vote, he just wanted to see the page. The fact you are accusing me makes me feel bad. I know not to canvass. The Gold Brick was for the fact I've talked to him before on chat, he is a nice guy, if you think I'm bribing users, you are obviously making false accusations. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:18, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
      • Well, I was just going on what Tat said, and you've got to admit it's pretty suspicious giving a barnstar to someone immediately after they vote for you. But I apologize if any of the above is untrue, obviously I can't see private messages and it's pretty rare I check chatlogs unless something comes up on the wiki itself, so I can only draw conclusions from what I can see. Without the complete picture, there is definitely room for error. NovaHawk 01:27, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
        • I'm completely fine now. I just need to think myself, withdraw or not? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:29, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Nomination by me -User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • I'd just like to thank everyone for supporting this Request! I really appreciate it. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 05:37, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Question for the candidate - What do you think blocks and bans are for, and why they're important? FB100Z • talk • contribs 06:14, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Answer Blocks are for repeating bad behaviour/not stopping something bad. It is a penalty for a users not behaving over a computer screen. (these questions remind me of my first request for admin) --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:15, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • If blocks are a penalty, how can they not be punitive? FB100Z • talk • contribs 06:22, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
        • A blocked user may have certain privileges taken off, such as the ability to edit pages or talk with other users, or they may be completely unable to access the service in question. Blocks can apply to individual user or ranges of IP's In most cases, individual services and websites set their own blocking policies, and a block issued by one will not apply on any others. How can it not be Punitive: Blocks are only meant to restrict the user's access to an online website or chatting system for the better of that service. They are not meant to be punitive in any way, but to protect the welfare of the service. They are necessary actions which need to take place under certain situations. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:30, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • It's funny, but, I didn't even get this much of supports on my first RfA. :/ User:Skdhjf/SigT 01:37, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • Who's special? Czech is special :P --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:40, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
      • Hehe... actually so many people have voted here... it's great :D User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:41, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
        • We have clear consensus, and this page is tormenting me D: --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:43, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
          • Patience is a virtue. User:Skdhjf/SigT 01:44, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
            • Patience is also a quality which admins need the most... that and a level head when dealing with problems :) User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:45, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
              • I sense a message that is indirectly pointing toward me. -_- :D Also, you forgot a period at the end of your sentence. :D User:Skdhjf/SigT 01:47, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                • Oh Em Cheese. It's a virtue not needed when yuo are 15+ ahead :P --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:14, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                  • Actually I wasn't trying to D:.<-hehehehehe User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:17, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                    • So this is just gonna stay around for another 2 weeks? =P Reminds me of Drew1200's chatmod request, he got 2 voters in a whole week and got the rights :D --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:19, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                      • @Ajr: Wow. I'm surprised you didn't forget the period. :P User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:20, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                        • This page is tormenting me D: Are we super-dooper sure, with almost everyone voted so far, we need to keep it open for much more? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:23, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
                          • "Voting will last for a period of two weeks." NovaHawk 02:30, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
HOLY CRAP MORE OPEN SPACE THAN ANYONE EVER NEEDS
  • Holy cow, when was the last time an admin request had so much discussion??? User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 12:40, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've decided that I really don't think I should be an admin. I'll think about this over a few days. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:59, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
    • You're withdrawing? I'm surprised, given the amount of support you've received, but it's your choice. FB100Z • talk • contribs 17:30, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
      • I don't know. Th opposing reasons are good reasons, I have a heck load of support, Give me a day to decide. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 21:51, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • When this gets archived, can someone remove the text-wall comments? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:30, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
    Why? We preserve fun as well as seriousness. FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:31, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
    t'll take up 3/4 of the page >:D --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:09, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • To Mr.Brick's double oppose (removed by Ajr) I didn't kick you, Bob bricks did. And opposing me over something that happened on chat ages ago is just whinging and holding a grudge. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:01, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • To Cm4s, awesome ticked off sig! I want to make one of those... User:Sonofhades101/signature
  • I think it's meant to close now, or at least it is in Australia. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 21:45, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • UTC time- when your sig says April 19, then it can be closed. NovaHawk 22:53, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Closing

This is my summary of the points above.

Support

  1. Excellent + friendly + helpful + awesome + nice user
  2. Great friend
  3. Great editor
  4. Always happy
  5. Stands his ground
  6. Speaks the truth
  7. NOT complaining about chat
  8. On for a long time

Oppose

  1. Not ready for admin yet (More of a 'summary' than a reason)
  2. Don't need more admins (Struck by me (Jag) - not an valid reason for oppose.)
  3. Ability to judge where blocks and warnings are appropriate + Taking blocking to an extreme
  4. Maturity
  5. Untrustworthy

The main points I can see in favour of CzechMate are Skd's ones, namely, that he is truthful, happy, and stands his ground. However, the oppose points seem to overweigh the supports.

I am expressing my judgement here as an admin, and what I would do as a bureaucrat. I am not closing, this, as I am not a b'crat, but just leaving it here for the closing b'crat to look at, and use as a reference. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:24, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

  • I can see the opposes are good reasons, but so are the supports, what is the verdict? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:30, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not a b'crat. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:34, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
I know, but 30+ support or something vs -8 oppose, what do you think? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:36, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, numbers mean nothing any more. And if we did use the old system, a good chunk of those voters would be disqualified. (Main reason I came herew was just to say I won't be closing this forum (was requested on my talk page)) NovaHawk 23:42, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
So, we need SKP or NXT... User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:46, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
NXT is a 'crat? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:47, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, no, he's not. SKP then. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:50, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
Ajr has struck his support so, isn't he now a neutral 'crat? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:54, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
I say pass!!! User:Sonofhades101/signature In a 'crat disguise! lol
I added a few more reasons to oppose and support
  • Are those actually reasons from the page, or just ones you though up? User:Cligra/Sig
  • Well, I've removed those from he list. It's supposed to include all the points brought up in the voting. User:Cligra/Sig
  • CLOSED Like Captain Jag said, though there is a lot of good points, the bad points do over-weigh the good points. I believe that there is a clear strong argument that after recent events, giving admin rights would be an un-wise action.
    Verdict: Nomination unsuccessful.

User:SKP4472/sig2 07:02, April 19, 2012 (UTC)


Darth henry[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Darth Henry does not only make for a good friend and chatmod. He is a great Brickapedian. He should be an admin


Support

  • He meets all the requrements and he is like the fifth most edits so yeah--WCDDoherty 01:34, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes i agree with you. -JMS
  • hed be good User:Ninjago9
    • Who are you? Please learn to type properly (add a sig) User:CM4S/Sig
  • You are a great user and I believe you would make a great admin, and you have met all the requirements, I see. User:Evanf/Sig
  • yes!he has worked hard and he deserves it!plus,he's ranked like 9th on here.-User:Mr.Brick

Neutral

Oppose

  • I don't think he's ready at all.. User:CM4S/Sig
  • Darth henry is a great user but I have my concerns with him being an admin: Dh lacks in British-English and seems to never upper case the word "I". Dh also has many noll edits and only about 49.47% of his edits are mainspace with 18.56% being blog comments. Darth henry is a friend but does not currently have what it takes to be an admin. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:11, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • Not to be mean but can you tell me what you count as a noll edit? User:Darth henry/Sig 3 15:57, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
      • To make a "dull" edit such as putting full stops, linking and linking the word "set". --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:48, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Mr.M. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Per above. I also have some concerns with maturity. NovaHawk 05:09, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Mr. Minifigure. User:Skdhjf/SigT 05:12, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per others. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 07:52, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everyone, definately not ready for admin rights.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Per others (and to CM4S below, I don't think that WCD understands the seriousness of admin).Berrybrick 10:26, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • hmm.... no, not yet Henry. -User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • Oppose - Per above. We're getting so many nominations these days...the bigger issue is not how annoying they are, but how they can damage the candidate's confidence when they fail. And yes, I said "when." FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:19, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • This will not damage my confidence when it fails. I knew it was doomed from the begining. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 02:57, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose He's immature and still isn't very good at spelling in UK English, To add on, He isn't the wisest user on coding things either, I see that as pretty important. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 07:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC) --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:05, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry but no Prisinorzero 15:30, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Mr.M. Sorry. User:Dataman1/sig 15:45, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • People in the oppose section have had some good reasons... User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Err- not even sure. User:1999bug/sig1 03:34, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • It's free wiki... User:Cligra/Sig
    • To nominate a user, first contact the user to see whether they accept your nomination. He's obviously not doing that. NovaHawk
  • Has the user accepted the nomination? User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:07, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • Sure User:Darth henry/Sig 3 02:08, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • "Per others (and to CM4S below, I don't think that WCD understands the seriousness of admin" Its very ironic coming from you.....--WCDDoherty 18:35, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • Yep. But I still don't. Comments like that don't make you look very good. Berrybrick 18:44, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:27, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • *bashes head against wall* Please tell me this is a joke. NovaHawk 06:48, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • "Voting will last for a period of two weeks." User:Cligra/Sig


Mykheh[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

When I withdrew my nomination last year, it was because I would not have have been able to keep what I stated due to me going inactive. Who would withdraw a nomination with 8 supporters and 0 opposers? A user that can be trusted to keep his word- me. To date, I have reverted countless edits, requested the blocking of countless accounts, and have tagged countless articles with the Speedy Delete tag. I could have blocked those users and deleted those pages myself. I was not able to do this because of the lack of the neccessary tools- tools that Administrators have. Ask anyone who knows me here- they know that I am a trusted user. As I said in my previous nomination:

"Now, with the added rights, I will help improve the wiki a great deal (I know nominees say this, but I do mean this)."

I do plan to accomplish this task. User:Mykheh/sig 01:03, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • Full support, as long as you don't intend to go inactive again anytime soon. User:Cligra/Sig
  • He's awesome
--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:11, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm tempted to close this as done right now (but I won't), since this user has already passed an RfA which he then withdrew due to him going inactive. This move allows me to fully support him - he was a great candidate for adminship before, and he clearly understands that the sysop tools are for people who need them. If he says that he needs them, I trust him to not go inactive again. Actually, I think that this could all be cleared up if he agrees to remove his sysop flag when he goes inactive again if it's within six months. That agreement would pretty much solve any issues with us just getting another inactive admin. User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:50, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • He is the user who needs this most of all right now. You have my full support and respect sir. Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 17:59, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • He has tagged way too many articles for deletion. :P Berrybrick 02:16, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Been doing a lot of work lately. NovaHawk 03:37, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Ajr (and Berry Brick :P) - CJC 10:23, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Been much more active lately, plus I just realised that he was one of the people who first welcomed me here 3 years ago. Seems a bit silly that he's not an admin now. :P -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 11:07, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:56, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • You are so trustworthy. You have my full support.Ebilwgrevious 14:29, March 5, 2012 (UTC)Ebilwgrevious

Neutral

  • Has only just recently come back to being active- guess I'm just hesitant because I just don't want another user who disappears instantly after they get admin rights (not saying you will, but you've only been back for a few days) NovaHawk 01:11, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per NhL, but I trust him fully. Berrybrick 01:29, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per NHL. If he keeps up the good work for a while, then I'll change my vote to support, methinks. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 17:54, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • It should be noted that Mykheh has agreed to remove his sysop flag if he goes inactive again. That should rest any concerns that people have (which I can understand, since he only returned a couple of days ago). User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:48, March 4, 2012 (UTC)


Skdhjf 4[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

(My last request was Not done, not unsuccessful, so re-opening this nomination is totally legal.)

Elaboration

The time I had as an administrator last year was a very great experience for me, as I felt as if I was helping our wiki even more than I was when I didn't have the extra tools. I was blocking the vandals, deleting pointless pages, and other admin stuff. It was a great time, until the end of the year... That's when my rights was removed. Most of you know I was acting a bit strange, and I wasn't the same Tatooine you all knew me as... But during the time I left LEGO wiki (a few months), I had time to think about why everyone seemed to vote to remove my rights. I have to admit, one of Ajr's last comments on my rant blogs really changed my whole outlook on my attitude in both real and cyber-life. He told me to stop acting like a d... and something else. (I only remember that part because when I see that stuff I get stirred up ;) I then realized it was me who was the problem, and I need to to apologize to the people I hurt (Ajr and NBP in particular) After I did, everything seemed to be just fine, and it was. Also, it was just a few months ago I was re-nominated for admin, but it was closed being "not done" - why? This is what I'd like to talk about a lot in this text wall. Your future isn't set in stone- what you do in the past, does not have to define what you will do in the future. No one knows for certain what the future holds. I remember when some of our new admins first joined. What if I judged you for the mistakes you made when you first joined, and used that against you in YOUR RfA back then? Would you see that it is fair? I feel that I can help brickipedia more than what I am doing right now with Sysop rights. I know I haven't been active a lot lately, but I swear, I attempt to edit with the spare time I have left in the day. Whether it'd be in lunch break between classes, or at 2:00 in the morning before I turn in. I always try to make sure no one is vandalizing, or things of that nature. And with my admin rights, I will use my extra tools to better the wiki. Thanks for reading. User:Skdhjf/SigT 22:24, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Update

For those opposing me for a reason in which I did in the past (to the two people who oppose me for: "the chat mod incident", fake threats to rename pages) look at the bigger picture here- those are personal things you're holding against me. Are you hear at 11:30 PM (and I was tired, and I had a long day) tagging 70 Advertisement images for speedy deletion while the bot/user keeps going, and an admin deletes them hours later? Let's say for the sake of a point those 70 images were not appropriate, and they stayed on this wiki for how many HOURS!? Think of how many children would've had to view them... Or are you here editing early in the morning reverting some vandal's edits? Or editing within open time slots in your schedule when you're extremely busy? Are you? The last one may be easy to answer, but really, please think about it...

Support

  • Sure.--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:29, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
    • No CP, It's not just "Sure". Being an admin is a serious thing. you can't just vote without caring. Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 22:33, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
      • Look, I understand admin is an important tool. I say "Sure" because I can trust him with it, I am caring, you just have something against him. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:36, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • He has behaved well and responssibly, taking an active part in the community --Brick bobby 22:51, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Take a look at the number pages Tat's flagged for speedy deletion since he's been back, it would have been so much easier for him to have these rights so he can just get rid of them already. @below- per Tat- he wasn't "threatening" to move anything (and it wasn't a joke), it was an example to show why Zane's father should be moved to Dr. Julian. When he first came back, I also saw him to be very level-headed in a couple of disputes. To me, Tat has matured a lot since when he had admin rights before- if he had it back then, why not have it now? NovaHawk 23:06, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I have no problems with this. Skd has learnt that his views aren't always required to be forced onto others, and other than that he was a good sysop in the past. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:09, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great user! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 03:32, March 2, 2012 (UTC) (P.S. Darth henry dopn't take it so literally.)
  • - CJC 18:57, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • JUST ABOUT TO NOMINATE YOU! Prisinorzero 20:42, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • After last night's chat and some careful consideration I am supporting this user. Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 12:07, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:57, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sure. You use it wisely. You really deserve to become an admin. Hope you win.Ebilwgrevious 14:27, March 5, 2012 (UTC)Ebilwgrevious
  • You've been... IDK, cool... :P Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Charge talk Devoted editor of Brickipedia. 04:22, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

* Oppose I don't think he is ready. In-fact just today he threatened to rename the Darth Vader page to Luke Skywalker's Father. BB said he was making a point. But why would one threathen to do something like that? Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 22:27, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

    • That was a joke. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:28, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
      • Um, per above. I was simply using that statement as an analogy to prove my point in a way where you could clearly see where I was going with my statement. User:Skdhjf/SigT 22:30, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
        • You call this a joke? Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 22:31, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
          • ...I've done that too. It's to try and show how stupid/nonsensical something is. Berrybrick 22:33, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
            • And for the record, I don't call it a joke. I call it making a point. It's totally different. Berrybrick 22:38, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Weakish Oppose I don't really feel that the user has been acting terribly mature recently. If he had completely reversed from how he was acting last year, I would support, but I'm honestly not that sure that he has. User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

  • I'll have to think about this a bit, I didn't oppose last time because of what happend last year (I didn't even know you changed names, I thought it was a different person :P), I just thought it was too soon. btw, I saw that underage forum, the first time said, "follow the law." and the second time, "no consensus changed." Berrybrick
  • As Berrybrick said I could, I completely removed my opposition (And all comments directed toward it) and am going on with my life. =D Lol. User:1999bug/sig1 02:13, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure it seems to have panned out. I'm thinking add rights. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:20, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
    I'm sure that the closing bureaucrat will be able to handle this... User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:24, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
    Which is you... User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:25, March 13, 2012 (UTC)


Agent Swipe (3)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Agent Swipe has been with the Brickipedia Community for over a year and brings a vital asset that we need. He is very mature and handles situations with care where everyone wins. He has patroller, rollback, and chat mod rights and uses them respnsibly and very maturally. He is active in forums and is a friend to everyone. I personally think he deserves these rights.

Support

  • As nominater. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 23:04, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's mature and edits loads so I don't see why not. Prisinorzero 17:32, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • He is very friendly. One of the users I can give my FULL trust. Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 23:10, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  • I'd just like to see him more active. I don't think he's been on much lately. Berrybrick 00:29, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Berrybrick NovaHawk 01:00, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Not active at all, I dont see him much. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster 01:15, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • He actually made 250 edits about a week ago. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:36, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
      • About three weeks, actually. User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:48, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
        • You know most of those edits were in one single day, by simply moving the page Example (disambiguation) to Example (Disambiguation). User:Skdhjf/SigT 04:59, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Very great user, don't take me wrong, but needs more activity/a little more maturity. I have had great talks with this user, and he is pretty mature for his age; but Sysop tools is a big responsibility- I don't think this user is there yet.. Also, just because a user has been on the wiki for a long time, doesn't mean he deserves the rights. His ratio of edits per day in the past few months is pretty dim.. Maybe if we waited a bit longer, he'd be ready. Just don't think now is the time. User:Skdhjf/SigT 03:35, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per BB. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 17:55, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Racelord[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

i RaceLord am on the Wiki for over 12 hours a day, i watch the Wikia Contributors every time they make a edit, because they are the number 1 page trashers. i am also on when other Admins are not.

I really think i should be a Admin because i can ban some Vandalists when they will not stop and protect pages which need to be. and i also work hard on the wiki when important stuff come out like when i put all the pictures on:
9509 LEGO Star Wars Advent Calendar
9516 Jabba's Palace

I also do a bit of work whenever i can find info or Pictures that need to be added.

Support

Neutral

  • Per Tat below, the time is not right. - CJC 10:28, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


Darth henry[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was withdrawn

DH here, I was wondering if I would be given sysop rights. I have 8,000 plus edits, have had rollback and patroller since a good while ago. I have also recently recieved chat mod rights ( I had them before chat was disabled also). I am nice to the users of wikia (the sincere ones, not the vandals). Even though I don't know coding, I am not afraid to ask admins what I do not know. (BTW this is just a test to know what I need to work on. However if you want to give me the rights....) :P User:Darth henry/Sig 3 01:40, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • Simply going with neutral. User:1999bug/sig1 02:17, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't mean for you to be upset, but after all the things you did with chat, I'm going with neutral. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  • I am going to be neutral, mainly because there are enough admins at the moment, and I don't think we need any more. Though yes, Darth has a very many amount of good edits, and he's a good user, but I don't think this wiki needs any more Admins momentarily. --Lord Shu 20:30, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per all above. Sorry, bud. User:CM4S/Sig
  • Per NHL and KoN. I haven't seen him on chat (surprise surprise), so I haven't seen any immature things he may have done. User:Captain Jag/sig1 00:07, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Now isn't the time for this; handling sysop rights is a BIG task, and I still think this user still has to mature more before he reaches that point. There have been some incidents recently indicating that this user does need to mature more. Also, the "however if you want to give me the rights..." part turns me off; administrator tools are a very serious matter, and shouldn't be taken lightly. User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:07, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Tat. Sorry, EDIT: I'm not sure. You edit mainspace but not many forums, You have problems with a few users here. User:Crazed Penguin/spook
  • Per above. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:55, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Tat, someone who seems to insist on messing up the entire structure of our reviews namespace despite several warnings seems to lack the required maturity for this right. NovaHawk 03:28, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
    • That could and should be forgiven, I know you put alot of effort into Brickipedia but, It's not THAT serious. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:25, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • You have made leaps and bounds since you were first here, but I still have concerns with maturity. User:Ajraddatz/sig 05:09, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • User has improved a lot, but still needs to progress before being capable of handling sysop rights. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 10:43, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per KoN Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • per the rest really. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • An administrator should be completely neutral. You need to work on that. User:Cligra/Sig
    • That's an exaggeration. No human can have knowledge about a topic and be neutral about it. FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:07, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per KoN - CJC 17:12, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC, Per KoN :P Berrybrick 19:55, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everyone.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Oppose - A little comment to everyone: DH has nominated himself so he can get feedback on how to be a better user; the "per above" comments aren't helping. At any rate, you're a very good editor, and I, as a fellow WikiGnome, commend you for your tireless contributions. However, there are a few things you could do to improve your editor awesomeness:
    • You have a history of some animosity against other users. I understand that you've made amends, but time is only good way to shake that off.
    • You've gotten some flak for making null edits. Null edits do have uses, such as to leave messages in the edit summary, but make it clear what they are; badge scumming is a nasty thing to be accused of.
    • Grammar and spelling. Brickipedians are all writers. Getting all the technical stuff down can be difficult, but your fellow editors will respect you more if you brush up on them. FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:07, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Thanks for the imput guys :). I think I'd like to leave this open another day or two before closing it. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 13:18, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Withdrawing nom. Please archive! :) User:Darth henry/Sig 3 01:56, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Adminship/Archive3&oldid=678024"