Brickipedia:Requests for Bureaucrat/Archive

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

ToaMeiko

ToaMeiko

ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,056 mainspace)

Hello fellow Brickipedians!

Today I'm taking a step forward in this community and requesting bureaucrat rights here. I do this because I feel like I am a valuable asset to this community and an active participant in all areas of the site. I have been a Brickipedian now for over a year and have had adminship for about 7 months. I am familiar with all Brickipedia policies and its community members, and have relevant experience as a bureaucrat at Meta and Customs. If you have any questions or comments, please leave them below. Happy editing! --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. Certainly someone I could trust with these rights. Good luck! -LFY1547 20:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  2. Probably the person on the site with the most need for these, actually. -Cligra
  3. Per every support I've made on every prior RfR of Meiko. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  4. I guess like Berrybrick I have one or two reservations, but I'd say all Meiko's done for the site far outweighs any concerns I might have. NovaHawk 01:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  5. Per NBS, and BFN. bbz 5ever --TheNightingale 04:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  6. Vasko (talk) 09:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  7. I was previously of the opinion that you where the absolute ruler of 'Media. --LK901100 AE - TLM RP 16:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  8. ...I guess. I can't see a compelling reason to oppose (although the same could be said about supporting). CJC95 (talk) 23:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  9. I have no reason to oppose, nor any reason to support to be honest, though I think Meiko is more than trustworthy to have bureaucrat rights. So, per CJC. SKP4472 (Admin) 15:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Honestly, I'm a little unimpressed with your behavior. Though you are generally friendly, I don't appreciate the way you occasionally use vulgar insults and chat has become a lot more "adult" with you around, though that probably cannot all be blamed on you, nor should it. I don't think that this is enough to oppose...so I'm not. Can't deny your outstanding service. Berrybrick (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Vulgar insults like what? Do note that if you have an issue with anything I say, the only way for me to know that is for you to tell me. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Nothing too recent, but I do believe I have pointed them out to you. There was the time where you repeatedly called Kahuka a dick and vindicated it because "it's Wikipedia policy," the light use of a derogatory term like "retard" used as a casual insult, and I also do not appreciate the language you use to speak of people (who are usually not an active part of our community) negatively and so openly. I'm not sure if I've pointed that last one out before, but I am pretty sure I have brought the first two up and, no, I can't think of repeat offenses, but that's why I'm not opposing. Berrybrick (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Also chats never pretty when CM4S and Meiko are on together, I see the words: You're a dick at least once. "I can call him whatever I want on a public chat"(this was said like last month) Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    CM4S has been on hundreds of times the same time I have, and there hasn't been a problem in months... I think the last time there was a problem was back before I even had administrator rights... --ToaMeiko (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    I did forget about the CM4S things, but ^ Berrybrick (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    You had a small clash last month, I call that a small problem. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Not recalling that. Asked CM4S about it on Skype, he doesn't recall it either. --ToaMeiko (talk) 16:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    You were arguing over something, and called him a dick. I said you can't call him a dick on a public chat, and you said "I can call him whatever I want on a public chat" Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Whether he called anyone anything or not, I think the point is they were arguing :/ UltrasonicNXT (talk)
    This doesn't ring a bell at all. And like CM4S said, he didn't recall it either. Are you sure you aren't remembering wrong? --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    Seems to be here. Make of it what you will. UltrasonicNXT (talk)
  2. Per above. I'm sorry, but if someone called me a va..., I'd be very upset. If a new user sees the words "you're a dick" on chat, they'll copy(or at least some would). With all your edits I might change to a support in the future, but not now. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Like Berry said, it wasn't a repeat thing, therefore only happened on one occasion, and that was in regard to metawikimedia:Don't be a dick, which I may remind you that I'm not the first administrator to have brought that up on this wiki... --ToaMeiko (talk) 16:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    It's the first time I remember seeing it. I'm positive it at least hadn't been quoted when I was around.... Berrybrick (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    Per berry, I've never seen anyone use that before. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Just because it's the title of a wikimedia page does not make it ok. UltrasonicNXT (talk)
    http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/?diff=1504137 Not trying to make Ajr seem like he did something wrong, but I'm not the only person, let alone the only admin, to use the word. :/ --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    This proposal is about you, not Ajr. What he has done in the past is irrelevant. UltrasonicNXT (talk)
    The point is you can't hold something against me as being wrong when it wasn't considered wrong of someone else to do it. That's what I'm saying. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    I hadn't seen that Ajr incident until just now. I think it was wrong of him to do it. UltrasonicNXT (talk)
    These are the two most hard-fought neutral votes I have ever seen. -Cligra
    Mine was just a reply each.... Berrybrick (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
    And I see you've forgotten the time I was called out for "Not giving a reason for neutrality." That was longer than it should have been. :P Berrybrick (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
    Since I've been politely thrown under the bus here... the context of what I said was very different, directed generally and towards Wikia staff which is a different audience than regular users here. This much argument over these neutral votes is honestly concerning in and of itself; if an issue is raised on an RfB of all places, I wouldn't expect it to be repeatedly argued. The correct response would be "ok, sorry for that, I won't do it again", and that is the sort of attitude I would expect from a bureaucrat here. We already have a lot of admins and bureaucrats here compared to actual users, so I think we can be a bit picky with appropriate behaviour. Consider this a neutral. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
    I didn't mean to throw you under the bus. All I meant to point out is that it never seemed to be a problem in the past, therefore I didn't know it to be a problem for me to have done, albeit something I've very rarely said. My apologies for using your actions as an example. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Closing as done - unanimous support for five days NovaHawk 22:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

CzechMate[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

CzechMate

CzechMate (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Well, yup. I am nominating myself for bureaucrat rights.

  • I am active enough. I plan on being much more active, too.
  • I am trusted with administrator rights. And this right is basically an add-on where I can help out by closing requests, and add administrator to accounts.
  • And in the words of others - we do need more crats around.
  • I was a 'crat at the Customs Wiki on 'media, so I know how it works.


So, yeah. If you oppose this, please state reasons, I will try and reply. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:13, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Definite support. Czech has become one of my best friends at Brickipedia in the past few months, and he's a great member of the community. Czech is responsible, respectful, and reasonable. He's always there when I need him, or an admin in general (except of course when time zones are way different, but that's not his fault. :3), and he's very helpful for both advice and just as a friend and wiki admin in general. He's also quite active in all namespaces on the wiki, which is a good characteristic to have in someone. I definitely trust bureaucrat rights in CzechMate, as he's been on of the most mature and responsible admins I've seen (who doesn't already have bureaucrat rights). Good luck, broski! :) --ToaMeiko (talk) 05:16, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. A great, active trustworthy user. I actually thought he was one already. Legosuperheroesfan (talk) 14:44, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko. Czech always keeps his cool, which is important for ANY staff member. And with the different time zones it helps keep this wiki safe 24/7! --Village.gw105 (talk) 23:55, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    Notice to admins: before you go striking this, the user, on their old account, has over 100 mainspace edits, thus their vote is valid. --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:04, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  4. <3 MsDtalk 01:16, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Though sometimes you may be a jerk, you are a great friend and I trust you more than many people on the wiki. You do have some issues, everyone does, especially me, but I still trust you completely. --Knight

Neutral

  1. Czech is a really responsible user, however, I don't think I could lean on any side. -User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:18, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I wasn't sure, until reading the votes below. You've been an amazing friend, but I have to agree with Boba, especially. Drewlzoo
I'm gonna stand aside here and vote neutral. This vote is subject to change. MsDtalk 12:22, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. This nomination surprised me, and in turn my vote is probably a little surprising to some people. Czech is a good friend and for the most part a beneficial member of the community, but there have been a number of incidents dotting his time here, including the recent mocking of Mr. Brix's logo contest (which was done with CM4S and one other user, I think). There are also some other vague issues I have, things I can't quite put my finger on. He also recently started saying he should be stripped of his rights because of the incident with Brix's contest, even saying things like he "doesn't need the rights anymore", which is why this nomination surprised me; I'm wondering now if the humility had been playing to the crowd. And lastly, Bureaucrat is more of an honorary position now--as we already have enough--and in my opinion the only one of the current admins really deserving of it is Berrybrick. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:51, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    That incident with Brix was several weeks ago, and Czech apologized very sincerely to Brix about it. I think Czech and the community could benefit more with him having these rights than without. In my opinion, based on your opposition reason, it would make more sense as a "Still has some room for improvement, but does well overall on the wiki" neutral vote, or however you'd phrase it. One mistake, especially one that is relatively old, and the fact that the user has not made such a mistake since, is not a reason to oppose in my opinion. It's a reason to be neutral at most. Like I, and others have said, in the current RfCM requests and my RfA nomination, look at the numerous positives, and don't just home in on one mistake. There are more reasons why Czech should have these rights than there are reasons why he should not. These are just my opinions, I'm not arguing your reasoning, but I think it makes more sense as a neutral vote. --ToaMeiko (talk) 05:57, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    It was the recent past; not nearly enough time to see if it won't occur again. And my other reasons still stand. However, your opinion is noted. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:01, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    (irrelevant but in) I thought Berry had 'crat? ~ CJC 10:54, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    Heh, so did I. I thought we made it a rule that you had to have 'crat to have CU. Oh well :S NovaHawk 13:34, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    He doesn't even use admin rights for anything but seemingly personal decisions (hate to bring it up again, but such as CM4S). MsDtalk 12:14, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. (I saw this as soon as it was posted, and have been thinking about it ever since.) Sorry Czech, like Jeyo, don't get me wrong, I like you a lot. But with recent things happening recently (the Mr. Brix blog thing with CM4S, and then the perma-ban of CM4S which I really don't understand (it seems like it was because he blanked his own userpage)), I can't really support this right now. If you posted it a couple of weeks ago, I would have supported without even thinking NovaHawk 13:34, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Jeyo, partially. Czech, you are an awesome friend, but why do you feel that you need the rights? It seems kind of sudden. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:43, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Jeyo. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:52, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. To make a user a Bureaucrat is to make their power permanent. If there is not an immediate need for Bureaucrats - say, all current Bureaucrats are retiring/retired, and if the person has done anything significant as of late that reflects negatively on them, then making them essentially unpunishable is not a good idea. Yes, Wikia can remove their rights, but from what I know, they act quite slowly. I have nothing against Czech as a person, I just feel that this is best for now. - BF2 Talk 00:10, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    I hope my vote is valid. I do have more than 100 mainspace edits, although I haven't edited in a while. - BF2 Talk 00:14, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Quite valid; you have over 17,000 mainspace edits. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 00:18, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Take a bit of NHL, a bit of Boba and a sprinkling of BFN, and you get my vote. My attempts to change my original view failed I'm afraid. ~ CJC 12:16, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  7. I gotta kinda agree with everyone up here. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:05, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Regarding MsD's original oppose reason:
[9/3/13 3:28:10 PM] CM4S: Czech for bcrat
[9/3/13 3:28:11 PM] CM4S: what
[9/3/13 3:28:17 PM] Andrew (MsD): idk
[9/3/13 3:28:28 PM] Andrew (MsD): I went neutral because I saw a really big argument coming
[9/3/13 3:28:38 PM] Andrew (MsD): He's like 2-3 anyways
[9/3/13 3:30:28 PM] CM4S: I dont' even like him as admin
[9/3/13 3:30:38 PM] Andrew (MsD): he doesn't even use his rights
[9/3/13 3:30:42 PM] Andrew (MsD): and when he does it's biased
[9/3/13 3:32:13 PM] CM4S: say that and oppose him
[9/3/13 3:32:14 PM] CM4S:  :P

Relevant. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:14, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

MsD came up with all the reasons. Sci just told him to. If MsD didn't want to oppose, he wouldn't have. And it looks like he didn't, although I'm not sure if he was pressured to do that or not. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 17:58, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
That conversation was actually several hours after I opposed. MsDtalk 22:32, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral. If you are leaving what is the purpose of getting the rights? Klagoer
    • To secure them for the future, I assume. When I officially left, Ajraddatz removed my rights because I wasn't using them, which is fair (then I sort of came back and lost them). That said, it doesn't seem to apply to a lot of admins, but oh well. - BF2 Talk 02:32, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
      • Am tempted to remove all inactive admins' flags, but that would require a discussion first. Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:43, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
        • A discussion should be undertaken. I do agree with your reasoning for removing inactive admins' flags. - BF2 Talk 03:28, September 7, 2013 (UTC)


King of Nynrah[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

King of Nynrah has been with us ever since the good old days. He's is active almost everyday, and a very responsible individual. Nothing would be wrong having one more 'crat... User:Skdhjf/SigT 18:33, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Yay :D -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 21:57, April 10, 2012 (UTC)


Neutral

  • I think KoN is awesome but, we do seem to have enough though though, feel free to remove this. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:04, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've decided to go neutral on all Bcrat requests unless all the other Bureaucrats are inactive, or of course, if the user would misuse the rights. I think KoN is currently the user that deserves it most out of all of those who don't have the rights, but I base my vote on who's active first. User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Oppose

  • Elaborate more, or I will strike your vote. User:Skdhjf/SigT 03:37, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Struck for no reason given. NovaHawk 23:04, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • You sillies ;) There's no need for this striking thing; a bureaucrat reviewing this argument can tell that it doesn't weigh much. FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:21, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hehe, I like how you said how it didn't "weigh much". :P User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:36, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yeah, I've accepted. :P Cheers to Tat for nominating me. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 18:37, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I can't remember, is his semi-activity over? Berrybrick 23:19, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes I believe it is. He's been on chat and editing quite a lot lately. :@ User:Skdhjf/SigT 23:21, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, my semi-activity was only for a while earlier on this year. It probably won't happen again. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 07:54, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • If tat gave you the nom why does he oppose? A bit strange dont you think?--WCDDoherty 21:55, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
He commented on an opposition, he didn't actually oppose. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 21:57, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
Three days 'till voting ends. ;) -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 10:50, April 12, 2012 (UTC)


Cligra[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Cligra is on everyday, He's active on RfR's and would help with closing them. He's trusted and friendly. He's a very community user.

Support

  • As nominator --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:42, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh, hell yeah!!! Go Cliggers!! =D --Lord Shu 00:47, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great admin, no harm in giving him that huge step up to bureaucrat. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:47, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think I can trust Cligra with having the ability to tick one more box in Special:Userrights :P NovaHawk 01:56, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per others Berrybrick 17:59, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everyone, one problem is that he welds dogs in his spare time so I advise a visit to a psychiatrists first Prisinorzero 18:01, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • 'Bout time this happened! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 01:38, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • A user devoted to the wiki, no reason not to support. --Brick bobby 18:26, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Per Ajr and NHL. :) User:SKP4472/sig2 20:18, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No reason to oppose and LOTS of reason to support! Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 23:08, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • A great user. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 00:01, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • - CJC 18:51, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hardworking and devoted user, deserves another promotion. ;) -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 18:54, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • i dont see why not!-Mr.Brick
  • Totally! He deserves it! Ebilwgrevious 14:32, March 5, 2012 (UTC)Ebilwgrevious
  • SO. MUCH. BRICKING. YES! Awesome friend/editor to the wiki, no WAY he shouldn't lose! User:CM4S/mlpsig
  • He Deserves to Be a Bureaucrat, He is on every day, active on chat, made thousands of edits, and is a great Admin, and a great Friend. User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig
  • User:Mykheh/sig 08:26, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • He deserves it. To me, I think his the most trusted user for the position of Bureaucrat. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 06:24, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well of course. It's about time this guy got his gold throne like CJC's. :P User:Skdhjf/SigT 07:13, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  • Absolutely nothing whatsoever against Cligra. If any admin where to get Bureaucrat, I would pick him, but there is no reason at all to have more bureaucrats. There's already a bunch of active ones. Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
    • We have only 1 active crat. -_---User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:50, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
      • CJC, Ajr, me (who is sort of active), SKP, and well TGE hasn't been on for a bit, but there's definitely more than 1. NovaHawk 01:56, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
        • There's also no reason to not have more bureaucrats. If more people want to be able to close the rare RfAs that pop up/flag bots, why shouldn't we allow more volunteers? Anyone who is trusted with access to the abusefilter, mediawiki interface, block, etc can be trusted with three more boxes to check in Special:UserRights. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:01, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
          • We can flag bots? I thought only BAG people were allowed to it that (I know know we can technically do it, but I still thought it was a BAG thing) NovaHawk 02:04, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
            • I suppose that's something that was never really defined (nor does it really need to be). Still, if some day the majority of BAG members couldn't flag bots then some bureaucrat could do it per request. Users could also request the bot flag temporarily if they were going to flood the RC with some task, although I'm the only one who has ever done that. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:06, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Ajraddatz[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

I am requesting the bureaucrat flag so that I can help out with the occasional RfA closure. I know that there aren't many of them, but after giving this a bit of thought I couldn't find a reason why this wouldn't be good. We have a high crat/admin ratio, but honestly, they are just rights. As it is I occasionally close the obviously unsuccessful ones, but I really shouldn't be doing that without the crat flag.

I've often said that I wouldn't be a good bureaucrat, and to some extent I still agree with this. However, I think that I am able to stay objective in the RfA process.

For those of you who might be concerned with this request violating the rules, I've been offered a 'crat nomination five times over my 2 years as an administrator here - I think I qualify :p User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:55, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  • Oh well, I've nominated Ajr (I’m one of the five), and I'll still nominate him... Support - per "nominating" him. :D User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:00, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • I asked ajr a while ago. Also 100 Days for me! User:Crazed Penguin/100DaySig 04:29, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Wow, being able to tick an admin box- big change in rights :P There really isn't any difference between admin and b'crat these days, don't see how just giving b'crat to any admin would hurt. NovaHawk 05:35, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • YES: Very mature, friendly, and has good edits. User:Darth henry/Sig 12:44, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Sure! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 13:35, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • - Remembrance-poppy.jpg - Lest we forget - CJC 17:38, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support
Berrybrick 20:56, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Strong Support. User:SKP4472/sig2 08:02, November 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • I have been waiting for this day to come. Out of anyone and everyone, I think Ajr deserves it most of all. 110% support! -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:46, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Aye -KoN Talk 18:06, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yuup
User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • Support removing the Neutral and Oppose sections :P FB100Z • talk • contribs 23:38, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

From five days ago: I actually have no desire to be a bureaucrat - Ajr -- lol User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:25, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
tbh I've never actually really thought about it until now, and now I don't see why not actually :p User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:26, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • <annoyed that my standard line can't go here since it's a request not a nom> NovaHawk 05:35, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • This request should be ending... now :D! User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:49, November 21, 2011 (UTC)


SKP4472[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

I have nominated SKP4472 for bcrat because he is a great user and helps many others. His edits are outstanding.

Support

Neutral

  • Neutral I don't want oppose, you don't deserve that. But I don't know if your time for bcrat is just yet. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:07, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per NBP. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • You have been a great help to me, but per NBP. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - In Range. Take a Shot. 02:34, August 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral- I'm sure you wouldn't abuse the powers, but I'm not sure that we need another one at the moment. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:31, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Mildly-Strong Oppose - We have one Bureaucrat (Kingcjc) who is Semi-active, and TheGrandEditor who is clearly "super active" as I may say. We also have Nighthawk leader. And it's not like we get RfAs every so hour. :) Nothing personal against the nominee. ;) User:Skdhjf/SigT 06:43, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
No offense taken. You have made a perfectly valid and legitimate point. :) User:SKP4472/sig2 17:24, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Thank you everyone for voicing your opinion, it's really appreciated! :) User:SKP4472/sig2 20:32, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

I'm presuming that this would be pass? I don't know whether Neutral stands for anything.
User:SKP4472/sig2 18:37, September 7, 2011 (UTC) Nah it dosnt add anything it just means they dont want to oppose you but they are just not sure. --Crazed Penguin talk 21:18, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

TheGrandEditor[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

He is the grand man why should i not!

TheGrandEditor's Statement: Despite being on Brickipedia for more than a year, I didn't really start editing like I do now until a little less than a year ago. I have the proof to show for it. Eighty-nine badges and counting, an edit every day for the past three hundred and thirty-three days, a group of friends who have my back and who's backs I have. I have accomplished much in this past year. But there have been days when I felt it just might not have been worth the trouble. But I got over those feelings, and I have stuck to this wiki through thick and thin, through a series of tumultuous events that saw several good editors lose some hope. I may not be here forever, but in the time I am willing to give, I want to make the most of it.

Support

  1. I really see no reason why he should not have this ability. He's a very trustworthy and intelligent user who acts responsibly about his duties and does not abuse his powers.User:BobaFett2/sig2
  2. Definetly, between his editing skills, his ability to handle vandalism so well, and his maturity, this user would make a perfect bcrat now. Even though he doesn't have as much experience as I'd like, I still think he deserves it. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 13:03, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  3. i know this user hasn`t had much time here but i think this user way deserves this right! User:Darth henry/Sig 01:33, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Per Nerfblasterpro. :) User:SKP4472/sig2 16:07, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Strong Support. TheGrandEditor is one of the few truly mature users, and even adminsistraotrs here at Brickipedia. I would rather have this user a bureaucrat than some other admins. I also admire his outstanding grammar, and clean language. And yes, with his edits, the amount of time he has been here does not matter. User:Mykheh/sig 03:54, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Per the others. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  7. Sure. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:25, July 24, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Definitely.User:Cligra/Sig
  9. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 01:50, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

#One year? I think bureaucrats should at least have been here for two years. User:Mykheh/sig 21:56, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? - Kingcjc 10:45, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, and tomorrow, I'm going to give a better reason for why I should be a bureaucrat. Right now, I really need some sleep. =( User:TheGrandEditor/sig1
  • In response to User:Mykheh, most of the people who have been here for more than two years are either already a bcrat, or left editing here (other than NBP, who had a temporary hiatus, but is otherwise with us again). User:TheGrandEditor/sig1
  • We all have our views and feelings. I am just utilizing my voting privileges here at Brickipedia. User:Mykheh/sig 22:06, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • How Nice. I currently just utlizing my nonexistent voting priviledges too. O< and I have views and feelings too, except I'm too low and "inexperienced" to be able to freerly express them. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:31, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Don't you just love community cabals? FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:46, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
Two years as an admin, or two years on Brickipedia? User:Captain Jag/sig1 22:40, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
The fact is, you only really need to be here four months and have more than a thousand edits to become a bcrat, and that's only if you are already an admin and are extremely good. User:TheGrandEditor/sig1
  • Happybrick: You don't have enough edits yet, or in other words not "old enough" to vote right now. User:Mykheh/sig 03:44, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Request for closure - Houston, we have consensus. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:55, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Nerfblasterpro[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failed

This is probably the hardest decision I've ever made on this site. And I do not want to look selfish at all, I know there are plenty of users who deserve this more than me. But I'm here for the LEGO Wiki, I've gone through the good times and the bad. Next to Ajr and cjc, I have the most experience when it comes to active admins. A few of main reasons though I am nominating myself:

1. My activity has gone up alot more and I've learned alot about the site

2. This is the only Wiki I am currently active on (besides the Nerf Blaster Wiki)

3. I know most of the users, and get along with all of them

4. I always have an opinion, and it won't always be pretty ;)

Now some reasons that may make you oppose, but as a good admin I should tell you them:

1. I don't always read through all the Blogs/Forums, I usually just skip to the good part

2. I'm not amazingly smart, so I won't understand every coding and talk. I need help there

3. I could be way more active, which I intend to be (My editcount isn't that high unfortunetely)

Again, plenty of other users deserve this more than me. But Brickipedia is a major part of my life, and I think I'm ready to be a bcrat. I'm always here for the users, always ready to help resolve any problems, and will always be an editor here. While I write this I am very nervous, I'm shakier than a little celebrity's toy dog. :P And if you've read this far and vote (even oppose), then I will give you a cookie! :) Well not really, but it will mean alot if you vote either way. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 15:24, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. You know it's worth a try ;)

Support

  1. User:Darth henry/Sig1
  2. User:Cligra/Sig
  3. My first true friend on Brickipedia. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  4. No words. Just da vote -----> User:1999bug/sig(Not enough edits to vote)
  5. (feel free to strike me since I'm not actually here anymore) NovaHawk 01:34, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Honesty and transparencty. That's what makes Nerfblastertrpo good. And that's why he'g got my vote. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 05:25, July 13, 2011 (UTC)(Not enough edits to vote)
    • How nice, I'm being silenced for having too little edits. I suppose I must resort to making crappy edits then have the ability to vote. How sad. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:46, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
      • You can now feel my pain :P It's actually my fault, since I wanted to set up a vote and get it over with, but I overestimated the general intelligence of the community. I had no idea so many of us were half-witted fascist cattle. FB100Z • talk • contribs 16:38, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Nuff said. :D User:Samdo994/sig1 10:53, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  8. I don't see why not. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...
  9. Long time contributor, great friend and a perfect successor to Nighthawk. Also, can we vote twice? (Just kidding. He deserves it though) GG 360Gamegear.jpg 12:59, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  10. Okay so, next Samdo and Ajr, then I'm next!!!! (In terms of when we joined) User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:13, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 04:03, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
  11. I got your back. User:Datovidny/sig
  12. Creepy, but responsible and mature enough for b'crat tools. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:55, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Mature? hehe that's funny :P Creepy? hehe that's true. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 19:13, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

#Support. After some consideration, I support this request. User:Mykheh/sig 21:23, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

  1. --R2-D2 (user) 21:30, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
    • Ha! I knew it! It's a conspiracy against me. Why would someone only cross out my vote, when there this dude who also should have his vote crossed according to that "rule". Hmm? User:Happybrick5/SickSig 15:44, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
      • I really could be doing something better than checking edit counts >_> - Kingcjc 16:18, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
      • You see? The rule is only applied when used against someone you don't like. FB100Z • talk • contribs 16:39, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Great user! Bureaucrat privileges would just help him do better things. I give him 100%.G4 23:23, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  3. User:SKP4472/sig2 16:09, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. You got my vote Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 23:52, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
    Vote was concluded before this vote was added - just seems no-one archived it... - Kingcjc 08:45, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Dont need another crat, your not active, the fact you have been for a few days in the last year or more is not enough Gladiatoring 03:17, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • You're surely joking, Gladiatoring. For Mr. M rfa, you said yea because he's a person. So what's with this? User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:42, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Yes, per above. User:Tatooine/SigT 16:42, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • NHL left, and Darth Smith already left = 1 bureaucrat. Wikis usually have more than one. User:Mykheh/sig 02:25, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
    but he logged in on the 4th of July this year! User:Happybrick5/SickSig 02:37, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
    Yes, but he left on the 7th of July. User:Mykheh/sig 02:41, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
    Just outta curiosity, would Darth Smith have the right amount of edits/experience to be a Bcrat anyways? :P -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 12:51, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
    probably not, but hes the founder after all. :P Someone like...me an innovatwr. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 15:34, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. I think not. We need a user who is...what's the word...like Samdo994- a high level of maturity. User:Mykheh/sig 22:13, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
    I'm confused, was it something I said that made you change your mind so abrubtly? And what do you mean level of maturity? Hmmm -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 22:50, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Not really active, at least get back into things here... User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:04, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  1. . I don't always read through all the Blogs/Forums, I usually just skip to the good part" - Join the club - Kingcjc 15:29, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
    • I know it sounds weird, what I'm trying to say (I think) is I look at all the forums, but if it's a long discussion I usually just comment on my opinion instead of jumping in (Usually because I just don't like to read through all the debates). Same with blogs, I don't always read all of the comments. Usually just the blog itself, and few recent comments. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 15:41, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
      • I think few people actually read all of the comments/discussion, myself included. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Not my vote, just the reason- I don't really want crat, just a joke really, so I crossed it out so nobody would think I really meant it. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:17, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Eh, Samdo is more mentally sophisticated in Wikia dealings, and is not as crazy you.:) (JK) User:Tatooine/SigT 21:42, July 15, 2011 (UTC) (Glad persuaded me.;))
  • My goodness, you people need to learn how to format votes correct :3 User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:25, July 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • So I assume we should archive this...as successful or failed? I believe due to only being 70% support, it is considered failed? -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 14:04, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
It's 0.789473684210526 percent support. So, I'd take it as 80. What's the margin again? User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:43, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
That made my day that you actually came up with that number. :D I believe the margin is actually 80%, which means I should have it then... O_o I think? -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 20:06, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Oops no, 78.9473684210526 percent, not less than one. It's just 15 divided by 19. User:Captain Jag/sig1 20:34, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
The support to oppose ratio is not 80%, so the nomination should not go through. User:Mykheh/sig 20:41, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

So the result appears to be failed. I can't archive it, but if someone else could that'd be great. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 23:14, July 29, 2011 (UTC)


TheGrandEditor[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Reasons for nomination:
1. TheGrandEditor is on Brickipedia every day, literally. He has been editing every day for the past 260 + days, and will continue to do so for the next 105 days.
2. It takes a lot to gain TheGrandEditor's trust, but once you have it, it'll be hard to lose it.
3. The users TheGrandEditor thinks will be trouble are watched vigilantly.
4. TheGrandEditor won't turn down a job unless he needs help.
5. It has been 2 months since TheGrandEditor was made an admin.
6. TheGrandEditor lost count of how much vandalism he's reverted long ago.
7. TheGrandEditor has a good opportunity to become an employee at the LEGO Store.
8. TheGrandEditor has memorized the MOS order for articles and applies it.
9. TheGrandEditor is part of important discussions.
10. TheGrandEditor won't/cannot abuse his tools.

Support

  1. You can count on me to vote for you. Mr. Minifigure 21:41, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Really no difference between admin and 'crat to me- you can't tick the "admin rights" box unless a vote's successful anyway. NovaHawk 13:44, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
  3. It doesn't hurt anyone.User:BobaFett2/sig2
  4. I see no reason why not. ...Half Way out of the Dark... 19:32, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  5. He really is a great editor, and he would not do any wrong editing.--Makuta Tarkairadan 18:27, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I dunno... I don't think that we need too many crats, and I'd like to see samdo on the throne myself :3 User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:42, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
    Wait, we get thrones? cjc 19:23, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
    Yes, but not you :P User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:27, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
    Makes sense for everyone but Kingcjc to get a throne :) NovaHawk 13:44, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Nighthawk is back, if he leaves again I will change my mind Arc comander Jim 18:19, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Noting personal TGE, but with Nighthawk the awesome "back" and passing by the site every so-and-so times I just see no need for another one at the current time. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 17:39, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Can't say I know this guy enough, but I don't think we currently need another crat. I wish I had a pertty little throne lk you guys... :P -Nerfblasterpro: Always supplying the boomsauce...Maverick.jpg 01:16, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'll take NHL's usual job of asking "had the user accepted the nomination"? User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:49, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Im neutral, I mean do we need new bureaucrats or not? Does some one become a bureaucrat because of their work or because we need more? —Unsigned comment by Agent Charge (talk • contribs).

I'd say wait until we only have one active/none active ones, having two that keep checking are enough for now. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:04, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
I think someone needs to fill out the reason section at the top. --TheGrandEditor 19:16, May 7, 2011 (UTC)


Cpatain Rex[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Amazing long-time contributor and admin, and I'd be happy to give him b'crat rights too NovaHawk 09:07, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support

# As nominator NovaHawk 09:07, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

  1. User:Agent Fuse/sig 06:19, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  2. As longs as he doesn't take another unexpected long leave Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 02:22, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Definitely. User:Captain Jag/sig 05:22, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I dunno... I don't think that we need two new bureaucrats. It looks like User:Kingcjc is going to pass his RfB, and that should be fine. User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:49, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Please don't take my oppose the wrong way. I think that you are a great editor and admin, but we will have enough crats IMO. User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:49, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Struck my own vote. Sorry Rex, it's nothing personal, and I'd still be happy to see you get the right, and wouldn't ever oppose, but you're kind of inactive again (no contributions for 20 days), so don't really see the point in giving additional rights to inactive users. NovaHawk 04:50, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • This has been open forever. Can someone please close it? User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:01, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
    • Closed. This nomination began before the new rules, but I don't think a +2 vote was ever considered to be enough to grant a user right. NovaHawk 07:54, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Kingcjc[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Successful

Kingcjc's been here for over two years now, and is a great contributor. He uses his admin tools responsibly, so I don't see what would be wrong with giving him b'crat tools too. NovaHawk 09:05, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator NovaHawk 09:05, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Hell yes!!!! --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 09:18, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Gladiatoring 11:16, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. -Mariofighter3: Open your Heart! 11:23, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Yeah, and pretty helpful too. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 15:47, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  6. User:Agent Fuse/sig 06:19, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  7. User:Captain Jag/sig 08:46, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  8. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:44, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  9. User:Cpatain Rex/sig 23:45, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Sure. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:51, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Absolutely Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.png No Crime Stands on Brickipedia 19:25, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
  12. I may not edit Brickipedia but cjc is a great editor and admin on Wikisimpsons so deserves the rights here from what I have seen of his contribs. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:25, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
  13. User:BobaFett2/sig2 21:43, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Bureaucrat/Archive&oldid=880043"