Examine individual changes

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse log)

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
1
Name of the user account (user_name)
DemetriaCosby19
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
* user
Page ID (page_id)
0
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title (without namespace) (page_title)
U.S. decide dismisses value-repairing claim from resorts web-sites
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
U.S. decide dismisses value-repairing claim from resorts web-sites
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
Action (action)
edit
Edit summary/reason (summary)
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
A group of major U.S. lodge chains and online vacation providers on Tuesday gained the dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing them of an field-extensive conspiracy to resolve the on the net selling prices of hotel rooms.<br><br>U.S. District Decide Jane Boyle in Dallas observed that the lawsuit, brought by customers who claimed they compensated inflated selling prices for their rooms, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this kind of a conspiracy existed.<br><br>Instead, she claimed, the agreements among each lodge chain and each on-line operator could be discussed by "rational enterprise interests" rather than anti-competitive actions.<br>The lodge corporations incorporate Starwood Resorts and Resorts All over the world Inc, InterContinental Lodges Group Plc and Marriott Global Inc even though the on the web agencies include Expedia Inc, Orbitz All over the world Inc and Priceline Com Inc.<br><br>A law [http://gallerycarsnet.blogspot.com/2011/04/ferrari-360-modena.html?showComment=1391191435646 Dubai Resorts - Where you might get the Best Deals] firm for the plaintiffs did not straight away react to a request for comment on Tuesday night time.<br>An Orbitz spokeswoman stated the corporation was delighted with the selection, which she reported was "effectively reasoned and properly interprets relevant regulation." A spokeswoman for Priceline declined to remark, when reps for other resort and reserving businesses did not reply to requests for remark outdoors U.S.<br><br>enterprise several hours.<br>The lawsuit, which consolidated various problems from numerous states, claimed that each individual lodge chain signed a offer with each on the internet journey business to publish 1 lowest charge whilst also tacitly agreeing not to compete with a single an additional, thereby producing "amount parity" and forcing customers to pay out artificially superior selling prices.<br><br>The corporations countered that the particular person agreements had been only an attempt by each lodge chain to make sure that it could management the on-line selling prices for its rooms. In return, they mentioned, the on the net organizations received assurance that their rivals would not be ready to undercut them, an clarification that Boyle recognized.<br><br>"Just for the reason that defendants' rational business enterprise pursuits can be recast in a suspicious mild does not indicate the allegations essentially propose a conspiracy was fashioned," Boyle wrote.<br><br>Boyle explained she would permit the plaintiffs to file an amended lawsuit if they could handle the deficiencies she discovered.<br>The case is [http://www.hotels-booking.com Hotels in Oakville Ontario] re On-line Vacation Company Hotel Reserving Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, twelve-cv-3515-B.<br>([http://Thesaurus.com/browse/Enhancing Enhancing] by Edwina Gibbs)
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
@@ -1 +1 @@ - +A group of major U.S. lodge chains and online vacation providers on Tuesday gained the dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing them of an field-extensive conspiracy to resolve the on the net selling prices of hotel rooms.<br><br>U.S. District Decide Jane Boyle in Dallas observed that the lawsuit, brought by customers who claimed they compensated inflated selling prices for their rooms, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this kind of a conspiracy existed.<br><br>Instead, she claimed, the agreements among each lodge chain and each on-line operator could be discussed by "rational enterprise interests" rather than anti-competitive actions.<br>The lodge corporations incorporate Starwood Resorts and Resorts All over the world Inc, InterContinental Lodges Group Plc and Marriott Global Inc even though the on the web agencies include Expedia Inc, Orbitz All over the world Inc and Priceline Com Inc.<br><br>A law [http://gallerycarsnet.blogspot.com/2011/04/ferrari-360-modena.html?showComment=1391191435646 Dubai Resorts - Where you might get the Best Deals] firm for the plaintiffs did not straight away react to a request for comment on Tuesday night time.<br>An Orbitz spokeswoman stated the corporation was delighted with the selection, which she reported was "effectively reasoned and properly interprets relevant regulation." A spokeswoman for Priceline declined to remark, when reps for other resort and reserving businesses did not reply to requests for remark outdoors U.S.<br><br>enterprise several hours.<br>The lawsuit, which consolidated various problems from numerous states, claimed that each individual lodge chain signed a offer with each on the internet journey business to publish 1 lowest charge whilst also tacitly agreeing not to compete with a single an additional, thereby producing "amount parity" and forcing customers to pay out artificially superior selling prices.<br><br>The corporations countered that the particular person agreements had been only an attempt by each lodge chain to make sure that it could management the on-line selling prices for its rooms. In return, they mentioned, the on the net organizations received assurance that their rivals would not be ready to undercut them, an clarification that Boyle recognized.<br><br>"Just for the reason that defendants' rational business enterprise pursuits can be recast in a suspicious mild does not indicate the allegations essentially propose a conspiracy was fashioned," Boyle wrote.<br><br>Boyle explained she would permit the plaintiffs to file an amended lawsuit if they could handle the deficiencies she discovered.<br>The case is [http://www.hotels-booking.com Hotels in Oakville Ontario] re On-line Vacation Company Hotel Reserving Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, twelve-cv-3515-B.<br>([http://Thesaurus.com/browse/Enhancing Enhancing] by Edwina Gibbs)
New page size (new_size)
2907
Old page size (old_size)
0
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
2907
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
A group of major U.S. lodge chains and online vacation providers on Tuesday gained the dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing them of an field-extensive conspiracy to resolve the on the net selling prices of hotel rooms.<br><br>U.S. District Decide Jane Boyle in Dallas observed that the lawsuit, brought by customers who claimed they compensated inflated selling prices for their rooms, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this kind of a conspiracy existed.<br><br>Instead, she claimed, the agreements among each lodge chain and each on-line operator could be discussed by "rational enterprise interests" rather than anti-competitive actions.<br>The lodge corporations incorporate Starwood Resorts and Resorts All over the world Inc, InterContinental Lodges Group Plc and Marriott Global Inc even though the on the web agencies include Expedia Inc, Orbitz All over the world Inc and Priceline Com Inc.<br><br>A law [http://gallerycarsnet.blogspot.com/2011/04/ferrari-360-modena.html?showComment=1391191435646 Dubai Resorts - Where you might get the Best Deals] firm for the plaintiffs did not straight away react to a request for comment on Tuesday night time.<br>An Orbitz spokeswoman stated the corporation was delighted with the selection, which she reported was "effectively reasoned and properly interprets relevant regulation." A spokeswoman for Priceline declined to remark, when reps for other resort and reserving businesses did not reply to requests for remark outdoors U.S.<br><br>enterprise several hours.<br>The lawsuit, which consolidated various problems from numerous states, claimed that each individual lodge chain signed a offer with each on the internet journey business to publish 1 lowest charge whilst also tacitly agreeing not to compete with a single an additional, thereby producing "amount parity" and forcing customers to pay out artificially superior selling prices.<br><br>The corporations countered that the particular person agreements had been only an attempt by each lodge chain to make sure that it could management the on-line selling prices for its rooms. In return, they mentioned, the on the net organizations received assurance that their rivals would not be ready to undercut them, an clarification that Boyle recognized.<br><br>"Just for the reason that defendants' rational business enterprise pursuits can be recast in a suspicious mild does not indicate the allegations essentially propose a conspiracy was fashioned," Boyle wrote.<br><br>Boyle explained she would permit the plaintiffs to file an amended lawsuit if they could handle the deficiencies she discovered.<br>The case is [http://www.hotels-booking.com Hotels in Oakville Ontario] re On-line Vacation Company Hotel Reserving Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, twelve-cv-3515-B.<br>([http://Thesaurus.com/browse/Enhancing Enhancing] by Edwina Gibbs)
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
New page text, stripped of any markup (new_text)
A group of major U.S. lodge chains and online vacation providers on Tuesday gained the dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing them of an field-extensive conspiracy to resolve the on the net selling prices of hotel rooms.U.S. District Decide Jane Boyle in Dallas observed that the lawsuit, brought by customers who claimed they compensated inflated selling prices for their rooms, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this kind of a conspiracy existed.Instead, she claimed, the agreements among each lodge chain and each on-line operator could be discussed by "rational enterprise interests" rather than anti-competitive actions.The lodge corporations incorporate Starwood Resorts and Resorts All over the world Inc, InterContinental Lodges Group Plc and Marriott Global Inc even though the on the web agencies include Expedia Inc, Orbitz All over the world Inc and Priceline Com Inc.A law Dubai Resorts - Where you might get the Best Deals firm for the plaintiffs did not straight away react to a request for comment on Tuesday night time.An Orbitz spokeswoman stated the corporation was delighted with the selection, which she reported was "effectively reasoned and properly interprets relevant regulation." A spokeswoman for Priceline declined to remark, when reps for other resort and reserving businesses did not reply to requests for remark outdoors U.S.enterprise several hours.The lawsuit, which consolidated various problems from numerous states, claimed that each individual lodge chain signed a offer with each on the internet journey business to publish 1 lowest charge whilst also tacitly agreeing not to compete with a single an additional, thereby producing "amount parity" and forcing customers to pay out artificially superior selling prices.The corporations countered that the particular person agreements had been only an attempt by each lodge chain to make sure that it could management the on-line selling prices for its rooms. In return, they mentioned, the on the net organizations received assurance that their rivals would not be ready to undercut them, an clarification that Boyle recognized."Just for the reason that defendants' rational business enterprise pursuits can be recast in a suspicious mild does not indicate the allegations essentially propose a conspiracy was fashioned," Boyle wrote.Boyle explained she would permit the plaintiffs to file an amended lawsuit if they could handle the deficiencies she discovered.The case is Hotels in Oakville Ontario re On-line Vacation Company Hotel Reserving Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, twelve-cv-3515-B.(Enhancing by Edwina Gibbs)
Parsed HTML source of the new revision (new_html)
<p>A group of major U.S. lodge chains and online vacation providers on Tuesday gained the dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing them of an field-extensive conspiracy to resolve the on the net selling prices of hotel rooms.<br /><br />U.S. District Decide Jane Boyle in Dallas observed that the lawsuit, brought by customers who claimed they compensated inflated selling prices for their rooms, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this kind of a conspiracy existed.<br /><br />Instead, she claimed, the agreements among each lodge chain and each on-line operator could be discussed by "rational enterprise interests" rather than anti-competitive actions.<br />The lodge corporations incorporate Starwood Resorts and Resorts All over the world Inc, InterContinental Lodges Group Plc and Marriott Global Inc even though the on the web agencies include Expedia Inc, Orbitz All over the world Inc and Priceline Com Inc.<br /><br />A law <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://gallerycarsnet.blogspot.com/2011/04/ferrari-360-modena.html?showComment=1391191435646">Dubai Resorts - Where you might get the Best Deals</a> firm for the plaintiffs did not straight away react to a request for comment on Tuesday night time.<br />An Orbitz spokeswoman stated the corporation was delighted with the selection, which she reported was "effectively reasoned and properly interprets relevant regulation." A spokeswoman for Priceline declined to remark, when reps for other resort and reserving businesses did not reply to requests for remark outdoors U.S.<br /><br />enterprise several hours.<br />The lawsuit, which consolidated various problems from numerous states, claimed that each individual lodge chain signed a offer with each on the internet journey business to publish 1 lowest charge whilst also tacitly agreeing not to compete with a single an additional, thereby producing "amount parity" and forcing customers to pay out artificially superior selling prices.<br /><br />The corporations countered that the particular person agreements had been only an attempt by each lodge chain to make sure that it could management the on-line selling prices for its rooms. In return, they mentioned, the on the net organizations received assurance that their rivals would not be ready to undercut them, an clarification that Boyle recognized.<br /><br />"Just for the reason that defendants' rational business enterprise pursuits can be recast in a suspicious mild does not indicate the allegations essentially propose a conspiracy was fashioned," Boyle wrote.<br /><br />Boyle explained she would permit the plaintiffs to file an amended lawsuit if they could handle the deficiencies she discovered.<br />The case is <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.hotels-booking.com">Hotels in Oakville Ontario</a> re On-line Vacation Company Hotel Reserving Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, twelve-cv-3515-B.<br />(<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://Thesaurus.com/browse/Enhancing">Enhancing</a> by Edwina Gibbs) </p> <!-- NewPP limit report Cached time: 20160603130132 Cache expiry: 604800 Dynamic content: false CPU time usage: 0.017 seconds Real time usage: 0.017 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 1/1000000 Preprocessor generated node count: 4/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 1/40 Expensive parser function count: 0/100 --> <!-- Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template) 100.00% 0.000 1 - -total -->
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1464958892