Examine individual changes

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse log)

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
409
Name of the user account (user_name)
Awesomeknight
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
chatmod * user autoconfirmed emailconfirmed
Page ID (page_id)
67883
Page namespace (page_namespace)
110
Page title (without namespace) (page_title)
Chat mod and editing
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
Forum:Chat mod and editing
Action (action)
edit
Edit summary/reason (summary)
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
{{Forumheader/new}} A motion to set a precedent that chat moderators should take an active role in the community besides chat, such as editing, maintenance, template creation, image uploading, or the like, either here, at Brickipedia Customs or at Brickimedia Meta, and to that end, propose the removal of those who currently have the right but do not partake in any of the aforementioned activities. [[User:CJC95|CJC95]] ([[User talk:CJC95|talk]]) 13:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC) :Completely agreed, if you look at the amount of traffic we have in chat as opposed to editing it shows that we have too much invested there and not enough in the actual site. I propose that we demote any chat mod who has not made an edit within a specified amount of time, whether it be 2 weeks, a month, etc. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC) ::I can work with either. [[User:CJC95|CJC95]] ([[User talk:CJC95|talk]]) 20:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC) :::My recommendation is 1 month, we should bring this to attention and then implant it. The question will be how you get chat moderator back. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 17:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC) ::::Make them re-request it. They should have to show they're willing to work for the right again, since clearly they haven't shown that effort since getting the right in the first place. --[[User:ToaMeiko|ToaMeiko]] ([[User talk:ToaMeiko|talk]]) 05:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) :::Agree with this totally. I really need to get editing again, but time is hard to find.... :( --<span style="margin-right:12px;text-shadow:#fff 0px 1px 0, #000 0 -1px 0;color:gray;font-family:Tahoma;font-size:20px;padding:1px;background-color:darkgrey;">LK901</span> 10:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC) ::::I think it would be fine as long as you do something when you can, which you usually do. [[User:Berrybrick|Berrybrick]] ([[User talk:Berrybrick|talk]]) 13:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) :I have mixed feelings about this one, to be honest. It feels almost like threatening users into editing, from my point of view. I feel that unless it's set up carefully, we'll either have users who feel they have too much to do to keep their rights in tact and just give them up, or do the bare minimum required to keep them. Either way is not too effective; I feel there could be much better ways to encourage editing, whether it's promoting it as an activity; saying "Hey, could you help me with this page" from time to time; or things like that. Though at the same time, I understand we don't really need all that many chat mods right now. It's more that I feel this change will be ineffective rather than harmful. I'll go neutral for now, but I'm leaning towards opposing. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 01:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC) ::We've encouraged editing in so many ways, no one cares. If you compare our chat numbers to our amount of daily, nay weekly, editors you would be shocked. Nobody is forcing anyone to edit, but if you want to have rights on this site you have to establish yourself through both editing and chat first. I don't see how it would be fair for someone to get special privelages to a site they don't even care about, only there for its chat system. If we were a site dedicated to LEGO forums/chatting, I don't think it would matter. But we're low on man-power and plenty of people have gotten rights and run away with them. Some kind of rule or system needs (or has needed) to be in put place. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC) :::Again, it's not so much the feeling that it'd be harmful as opposed to the feeling that it's going to be ineffective. I could be wrong, though, so I only went neutral. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 14:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
{{Forumheader/new}} A motion to set a precedent that chat moderators should take an active role in the community besides chat, such as editing, maintenance, template creation, image uploading, or the like, either here, at Brickipedia Customs or at Brickimedia Meta, and to that end, propose the removal of those who currently have the right but do not partake in any of the aforementioned activities. [[User:CJC95|CJC95]] ([[User talk:CJC95|talk]]) 13:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC) :Completely agreed, if you look at the amount of traffic we have in chat as opposed to editing it shows that we have too much invested there and not enough in the actual site. I propose that we demote any chat mod who has not made an edit within a specified amount of time, whether it be 2 weeks, a month, etc. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC) ::I can work with either. [[User:CJC95|CJC95]] ([[User talk:CJC95|talk]]) 20:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC) :::My recommendation is 1 month, we should bring this to attention and then implant it. The question will be how you get chat moderator back. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 17:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC) ::::Make them re-request it. They should have to show they're willing to work for the right again, since clearly they haven't shown that effort since getting the right in the first place. --[[User:ToaMeiko|ToaMeiko]] ([[User talk:ToaMeiko|talk]]) 05:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) :::Agree with this totally. I really need to get editing again, but time is hard to find.... :( --<span style="margin-right:12px;text-shadow:#fff 0px 1px 0, #000 0 -1px 0;color:gray;font-family:Tahoma;font-size:20px;padding:1px;background-color:darkgrey;">LK901</span> 10:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC) ::::I think it would be fine as long as you do something when you can, which you usually do. [[User:Berrybrick|Berrybrick]] ([[User talk:Berrybrick|talk]]) 13:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) :I have mixed feelings about this one, to be honest. It feels almost like threatening users into editing, from my point of view. I feel that unless it's set up carefully, we'll either have users who feel they have too much to do to keep their rights in tact and just give them up, or do the bare minimum required to keep them. Either way is not too effective; I feel there could be much better ways to encourage editing, whether it's promoting it as an activity; saying "Hey, could you help me with this page" from time to time; or things like that. Though at the same time, I understand we don't really need all that many chat mods right now. It's more that I feel this change will be ineffective rather than harmful. I'll go neutral for now, but I'm leaning towards opposing. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 01:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC) ::We've encouraged editing in so many ways, no one cares. If you compare our chat numbers to our amount of daily, nay weekly, editors you would be shocked. Nobody is forcing anyone to edit, but if you want to have rights on this site you have to establish yourself through both editing and chat first. I don't see how it would be fair for someone to get special privelages to a site they don't even care about, only there for its chat system. If we were a site dedicated to LEGO forums/chatting, I don't think it would matter. But we're low on man-power and plenty of people have gotten rights and run away with them. Some kind of rule or system needs (or has needed) to be in put place. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC) :::Again, it's not so much the feeling that it'd be harmful as opposed to the feeling that it's going to be ineffective. I could be wrong, though, so I only went neutral. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 14:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC) :A chat moderator's job is to moderate chat. They should be active in chat. It should be encouraged for them to edit, but not enforced, as editing is not their job's first priority. --Knight
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ :I have mixed feelings about this one, to be honest. It feels almost like threatening users into editing, from my point of view. I feel that unless it's set up carefully, we'll either have users who feel they have too much to do to keep their rights in tact and just give them up, or do the bare minimum required to keep them. Either way is not too effective; I feel there could be much better ways to encourage editing, whether it's promoting it as an activity; saying "Hey, could you help me with this page" from time to time; or things like that. Though at the same time, I understand we don't really need all that many chat mods right now. It's more that I feel this change will be ineffective rather than harmful. I'll go neutral for now, but I'm leaning towards opposing. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 01:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC) ::We've encouraged editing in so many ways, no one cares. If you compare our chat numbers to our amount of daily, nay weekly, editors you would be shocked. Nobody is forcing anyone to edit, but if you want to have rights on this site you have to establish yourself through both editing and chat first. I don't see how it would be fair for someone to get special privelages to a site they don't even care about, only there for its chat system. If we were a site dedicated to LEGO forums/chatting, I don't think it would matter. But we're low on man-power and plenty of people have gotten rights and run away with them. Some kind of rule or system needs (or has needed) to be in put place. -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC) :::Again, it's not so much the feeling that it'd be harmful as opposed to the feeling that it's going to be ineffective. I could be wrong, though, so I only went neutral. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 14:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC) +:A chat moderator's job is to moderate chat. They should be active in chat. It should be encouraged for them to edit, but not enforced, as editing is not their job's first priority. --Knight
New page size (new_size)
4081
Old page size (old_size)
3890
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
191
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
:A chat moderator's job is to moderate chat. They should be active in chat. It should be encouraged for them to edit, but not enforced, as editing is not their job's first priority. --Knight
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1412640402