Class 2

Featured articles - Featured Article Nominations - Content Improvement - Articles for Rating
Shortcut:
BP:CLASS2
BP:CAP
Rating-2-glossy.png

This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.

Requirements

Complete articles must...

  1. ...comply with the manual of style completely.
  2. ...have their infoboxes filled out as best as possible.
  3. ...have a small lead section that describes the basic infos of the subject like release year, theme, rough overview of the content.
  4. ...have a paragraph that describes the subject in greater detail (only if necessary; small sets that contain just small simple models may not need such a section).
  5. ...have an external links section (sets only)/appearances section (minifigures only)/a complete set list (themes only).
  6. ...must not be tagged with any maintenance templates such as {{redbricks}} or {{brickify}}.
How to nominate:
  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Class 2 status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. A member of the Quality Check Group will then review the article for completeness and either approve ({{Done}}, 600px-Yes check.svg.png) or reject ({{Not Done}}, X mark.svg) it, supplying reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. The nomination will be removed three days after being reviewed, giving the nominator enough time to see the verdict. In case of rejection he may nominate the article once again after the reason for rejection has been addressed.
 To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] ==
*'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~
*'''Nomination comments:'''
;Verdict

All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed.

Proposals

Butcher

  • Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 18:50, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
    • I haven't checked yet, but wanted to say to put new nominations on the bottom. Berrybrick 18:52, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:Mykheh/sig 02:30, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


Bandit (Minifigures)

I think I made this article good enough for class 2. 600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Had to fix it up some, but I think it just makes the cut. Berrybrick 21:33, January 29, 2012 (UTC)


Clone Trooper

  • Nomination comments:

it is definitely class 2 this time

  • verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. I'd say there needs to be a description of the basic minifigure... Background is fine, but it needs to describe the physical attributes of the minifigure. User:Fudgepie/sig 01:43, September 22, 2011 (UTC)


The Penguin

  • Nominated by: Berrybrick talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 22:18, August 26, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It was just upgraded to C3, but that was while there were "Too Many Red Bricks" Berrybrick talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:Fudgepie/sig 15:52, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker

X mark.svg Not Done. Same reasons as Leia's nom below. NovaHawk 04:48, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


Leia Organa

  • Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 02:10, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination Comments This article is rated class 4. I think it should be class 2 or at least class 3.
  • Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Defintiely not Class 2 material- the most obvious reason being that there is no description section. Class 3, maybe, I'd say it's bordering between Class 3 and 4. Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 04:22, September 14, 2011 (UTC)


Batman (Minifigure)

  • Nominated by: Berrybrick talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 00:36, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Has recently been updated with Videogame content.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. nominate yourself for QCG pls User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:20, August 28, 2011 (UTC)


7782 The Batwing: The Joker's Aerial Assault

  • Nominated by:--Munchman14Dino Attack 02:26, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:A page I've been wanting to expand for a while and I finally have. It meets all requirements nicely.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. NovaHawk 02:30, October 8, 2011 (UTC)


Alien Cyborg

Verdict

{{Not done|Uses CG image in infobox, should be a photo of the actual minifigure. Other than that, neutral I guess NovaHawk 08:00, October 14, 2011 (UTC)}}

Is that really a valid oppose? User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 16:50, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
What? CG pics look good. It says no where on Brickipedia policy that It can't be CGI or CG. I reckon It should be Class 2. --Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin talk 00:27, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
this is the line I'm thinking of, but I can't find it in any policy page... I'm sure it was voted on though. I'll keep looking. NovaHawk 01:06, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral- I just think it could do with a little bit of expanding NovaHawk 01:37, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
So It's good to go? --Da Penguin with da Epic Skillz! Crazed Penguin talk 02:18, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
No, neutral doesn't mean yes. Just that another QCG member should judge it as I can't decide either way. NovaHawk 02:50, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
I'm Neutral too. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
X mark.svg Not Done. I'd like to see more in the "description" section, such as the parts used to create the minifigure (, incorperated into the article, not in a list) and some background, such as the planted he came from and his rank in the invasion. --Berrybrick (Talk)


Alien Commander (Alien Conquest)

Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. not all accessories listed in infobox. Other than that, neutral- but I just feel the description could do with a little more expansion NovaHawk 01:37, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Zane

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Seems good User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 23:57, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

6860 The Batcave

  • Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 07:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This article has ALL needed sections that the MoS states: description, notes, gallery, etc. Also, the description of the product is quite substantial. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 07:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


Part 08010bc02

  • Nominated by: User:Zaersk/sigcodes 20:53, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Has all the requirements for a complete part article.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Needs a gallery, I think. User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 20:55, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

  • Why is it not done? Then why do articles like this and much more don't have galleries and they're c2's. The article seems c2 to me - the MoS states that Part articles don't need galleries. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:02, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
    (link) User:Zaersk/sigcodes 21:04, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Looks fine to me. Why would it need a gallery?User:Cligra/Sig

  • I thought it did. I guess that's only with multiple colors. And about that sticker sheet, it was rated before we implemented the galleries. User:Berrybrick/XmasSig 21:13, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

7145 Von Nebula

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


7147 XPlode

Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Needs a bit more info, especially, in the description. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature


Part 6053c01

Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Made it class 3. Needs a description, but otherwise good. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Part 3308px1

Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. Made it class 3. Needs a description, but otherwise good. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

  • I added a longer description, I'd like to re-nominate it for class 2. User:Zaersk/sigcodes 18:12, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Han Solo

  • Nominated by: Agent Swipe(talk) 02:20, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Seems good enough
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

4528 Green Lantern

  • Nominated by: King of Nynrah Talk 18:02, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I added the background, detailed set description, notes, and even an inventory. I think this makes Class 2 now.
Verdict
  • It's very close, however it does need a little bit of a cleanup- no AU$ price in infobox, and inclusion of a LA $ price (which isn't one of the four MoS prices). Also getting rid of at least some of the gallery would be great, there are a few strange images in there, and captioning what's left (or integrating them into the article) NovaHawk 08:45, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Done :D -King of Nynrah Talk 21:05, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. :D Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 21:47, January 17, 2012 (UTC)


2011

  • Nominated by: User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:37, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Has most information.I'm not sure about Year pages when It comes to rating.
Verdict
  • I'm not going to rate it because I don't know how to myself, but I would be leaning towards not done due to the large number of redlinks. NovaHawk 08:45, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
    • Class 3 then?
      • It already is C3 NovaHawk 21:55, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Darth Vader

  • Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 13:30, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This page is very detailed, and has a good descrription section. This page definately deserves class 2.
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. It's close, but it needs its sections re-ordered to comply with the MoS. Also, there's a lot of subjective comments in there, eg "The head also, in a strange way despite being in traditional LEGO style, has an increased resemblance to Hayden Christensen.", "but he is not even close to Luke Skywalker". Also no info on the microfigure, the infobox lists 5 variants yet the minfigure gallery has 9 Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 21:09, January 18, 2012 (UTC)


Cole

  • Nominated by: User:Darth henry/Sig 22:29, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A good article
Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. No description on NRG variant, lots of useless/duplicate gallery images, accessories and variations fields in infobox need formatting, bolding of variants in description section Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 22:50, January 19, 2012 (UTC)


Mechanic (Collectable Minifigures)

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:Cligra.Sig


Sleepyhead

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. If the Elf is Class 2, this definitly is. My only concern is that some of the notes could be incorporated into the description section. Berrybrick 14:50, February 3, 2012 (UTC)


Minifigures (Theme)

  • Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • Nomination comments: I am still working on it but I think it should by now be Class 2.
Verdict

10184 Town Plan

  • Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • Nomination comments: I am still working on it but I think it should by now be Class 2.
Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. User:Cligra/Sig


Part 87788

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Crown Knights.pngBerrybrick 11:51, March 1, 2012 (UTC)


Classic Alien

Verdict
  • Not going to say not done, but for me to rate something as "complete", I'd expect the description to be fully complete, ie what's on the back? Is there printing or is it plain? (Also, should collectable minifigures have backgrounds? I guess whatever you say is just taken straight from the official description which is on the page anyway) Crown Knights.png NovaHawk 09:20, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Friends

Verdict

600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. :D User:Cligra/Sig

  • (Could do with a background section though NovaHawk 07:12, March 2, 2012 (UTC))

5762 Mini Plane

  • Nominated by: User:Dataman1/sig 18:39, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Worked pretty hard on this, NHL says he thinks it is a c3, close to a c2, but that others may think differently. Please get back to me on this.
Verdict


7066 Earth Defense HQ

  • Nominated by:-User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • Nomination comments: I'd say this seems detailed enough with description, infobox and notes (despite some notes being on visual assumptions). I'm also not the only user to think this should be a class 2 article.

X mark.svg Not Done. I'm working on this one (very slowly), so maybe in a month or two. User:Cligra/Sig

  • Was going to say done, but I got an editconflict... any reason why it isn't complete as it is? Doesn't seem to be missing anything to me... NovaHawk 07:16, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, I guess it is technically complete, I just don't feel it's very well written. User:Cligra/Sig
  • I guess so, not going to argue with you, it could definitely do with a lot of expansion on the alien saucer and the jet as well, guess I'd give it a not done after all (good thing you got here first :D) NovaHawk 07:23, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Articles_for_Rating/Class_2&oldid=706315"
... more about "Articles for Rating/Class 2"
RDF feed
Has parent pageThis property is a special property in this wiki.
Brickipedia:Articles for Rating +