Shortcut: BP:CLASS2 BP:CAP

This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.

Requirements

Complete articles must...

...comply with the manual of style completely.
...have their infoboxes filled out as best as possible.
...have a small lead section that describes the basic infos of the subject like release year, theme, rough overview of the content.
...have a paragraph that describes the subject in greater detail (only if necessary; small sets that contain just small simple models may not need such a section).
...have an external links section (sets only)/appearances section (minifigures only)/a complete set list (themes only).
...must not be tagged with any maintenance templates such as {{redbricks}} or {{brickify}}.

How to nominate:

First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Class 2 status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
A member of the Quality Check Group will then review the article for completeness and either approve ({{Done}}, ) or reject ({{Not Done}}, ) it, supplying reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
The nomination will be removed three days after being reviewed, giving the nominator enough time to see the verdict. In case of rejection he may nominate the article once again after the reason for rejection has been addressed.

To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] == *'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~ *'''Nomination comments:''' ;Verdict

All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed.

Proposals

Butcher

Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 18:50, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- I haven't checked yet, but wanted to say to put new nominations on the bottom. Berrybrick 18:52, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Done. User:Mykheh/sig 02:30, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Minifigures (Theme)

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
Nomination comments: I am still working on it but I think it should by now be Class 2.

Verdict

I would give it c2, but can you explain the sentence The minifigures can be based off of real people, movie stars and anyone else that poses as a figure in society? The only one confirmed to be based on something else is Lady Liberty :S Other than that, happy to give it c2 NovaHawk 01:28, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Classic Alien

Nominated by: User:CzechMate/sig1
Nomination comments:

Verdict

Not going to say not done, but for me to rate something as "complete", I'd expect the description to be fully complete, ie what's on the back? Is there printing or is it plain? (Also, should collectable minifigures have backgrounds? I guess whatever you say is just taken straight from the official description which is on the page anyway) NovaHawk 09:20, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

5762 Mini Plane

Nominated by: User:Dataman1/sig 18:39, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Worked pretty hard on this, NHL says he thinks it is a c3, close to a c2, but that others may think differently. Please get back to me on this.

Verdict

It already is C2. User:Cligra/Sig

8613 Kanoka Disk Launcher Pack

Nominated by: -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 12:41, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: During my daily BIONICLE trawl I was surprised to see how much information this page has. Definitely C2 material in my opinion.

Verdict

Great article, but most of it is copied straight from here. Also would need a MoS cleanup in terms of headings NovaHawk 13:07, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Part 30304

Nominated by: NovaHawk 23:40, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I'm not exactly sure about part article ratings. Also, the list is from Peeron, so it may not have 2011/2012 stuff listed (and I can't think of any recent sets containing this piece)

Verdict

Not Done. It needs an image, at the very least. :/ User:Cligra/Sig

So picky :P Sorry, I thought I was forgetting something (uploaded). Do part articles need a description/anything else? NovaHawk 02:42, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Done. I don't think so. User:Cligra/Sig

10001 Metroliner

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
Nomination comments:

Verdict

Done. NovaHawk 03:00, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

5764 Rescue Robot

Nominated by: User:Dataman1/sig 14:19, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

C3, close to C2 was NHL's verdict, but he said this may be a C2 quality article.

Verdict

9675 Sebulba's Podracer & Tatooine

Nominated by: User:Dataman1/sig 14:58, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

Wrote an entire description section, added to the notes, and improved the article in general. Definitely at least a C3, probably a C2.

Verdict

Not Done. Needs a short background. Also needed the {{price}} template (which I added), and Episode I subtheme needs to be in infobox. Other than that, I have no objections, I gave it Class 3 for now. NovaHawk 23:15, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Part 98147pb02

Nominated by: User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 2:46, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

Added more information, added External Links, Added See Also, Fixed Appearances, and it Meets all the Requirements

Verdict

Done. User:Cligra/Sig

Fang-Suei

Nominated by: User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 4:51, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

Added more information, added description, fixed appearances, fixed notes, fixed background

Verdict

Done. It is short for a minifigure article, but it seems to contain all the relevant info. NovaHawk 23:57, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Minifigures (Theme)

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
Nomination comments: I fixed what NHL said above so now it should be a definate C2.

Verdict

Done. NovaHawk 23:49, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

4754 Hagrid's Hut

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
Nomination comments:

Verdict

Not Done. very close, but at a glance, the "architecture" bit should be a subheading in "description", and there needs to be a background section. Given it c3 for now NovaHawk 05:16, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Bride (Minifigures)

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
Nomination comments:

Verdict

Done. NovaHawk 05:17, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Cad Bane

Nominated by: -_- Jedi Master Sith >:(
Nomination comments: It is a great article.

Verdict

Not Done. for starters, description is completely subjective and lacking any detail. NovaHawk 14:54, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

True.

Part 3626bpb662

Nominated by: User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 14:40, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

Verdict

9674 Naboo Starfighter & Naboo

Nominated by: User:Dataman1/sig 14:48, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Worked really hard on this, I think it's a C2.

Verdict

Done. Seems to cover everything NovaHawk 05:16, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Johnny Thunder

Nominated by: -User:Power Jim/sigcode 09:43, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: It's definitely has enough info. and MoS completion to be a class 2 in my view.

Verdict

Fangtom

Nominated by: -User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 00:43, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Added Description, References, See Also, Quotes Fixed Background and Gallery and LEGO.com Bio.

Verdict

Not Done. Head and torso in description simply say "it's the same as Fangdam's", without actually describing the pieces. Then on Fangdom's page, it says they're the same as Fangtom's. Sure, make a comparison, but they both really need a description of their pieces. Also, in the background, it says that his main appearance is in "All of Nothing", it's one sentence, yet for the other episode, it's a paragraph, possibly indicating either it's not his primary appearance, or there's some content missing there. Given it c3 for now though. NovaHawk 05:16, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Done. Nominator later expanded it. NovaHawk 07:59, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Proposals