Shortcut: BP:CLASS2 BP:CAP

This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.

Requirements

Complete articles must...

...comply with the manual of style completely.
...have their infoboxes filled out as best as possible.
...have a small lead section that describes the basic infos of the subject like release year, theme, rough overview of the content.
...have a paragraph that describes the subject in greater detail (only if necessary; small sets that contain just small simple models may not need such a section).
...have an external links section (sets only)/appearances section (minifigures only)/a complete set list (themes only).
...must not be tagged with any maintenance templates such as {{redbricks}} or {{brickify}}.

How to nominate:

First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Class 2 status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
A member of the Quality Check Group will then review the article for completeness and either approve ({{Done}}, ) or reject ({{Not Done}}, ) it, supplying reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
The nomination will be removed three days after being reviewed, giving the nominator enough time to see the verdict. In case of rejection he may nominate the article once again after the reason for rejection has been addressed.

To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] == *'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~ *'''Nomination comments:''' ;Verdict

All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed.

Proposals

4479 TIE Bomber

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Added description, background and notes section.

Verdict

C3, yes, C2, not sure. I think the article could do with more of a description and the note in the notes section should probably be in the background section. User:SKP4472/sig3 20:24, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. Also, it doesn't describe the cannon or how it's fired. If it's still there in 5 days or so when I can go back to promoting articles, I'll try and fix it up. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Yeah, I don't have the set; I was just going by my observations of the image and what I knew of the normal TIE fighter set. When I edit pages like that, I leave out all that I'm unsure of. ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge

30005 Imperial Speeder Bike

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Added description, an image and a gallery

Verdict

Not Done. No background NovaHawk 23:46, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

There was no background to write about. That is not based off an actual vehicle. ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge

6218 Splitface

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 04:33, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Researched and added background and description.

Verdict

I'm a little confused about the background- half of it's italic, and the background should also be original. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Meltrox

Nominated by: User:Drew1200/Sigifier
Nomination comments: I went back through and cleaned the page up as well as added some more information. I couldn't find any more information about this monster anywhere on the web, and I had no further knowledge of it.

Verdict

Done. Berrybrick 21:06, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Glaciator

Nominated by: User:Drew1200/Sigifier
Nomination comments: I went back through and cleaned the page up as well as added some more information. I couldn't find any more information about this monster anywhere on the web, and I had no further knowledge of it.

Verdict: Done, look good. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:41, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Lizaru

Nominated by: User:LegoRokz112/Sig1
Nomination comments:Added large Description section, added correct photo, changed Background.

Verdict

852759 LEGO Ruler

Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig2
Nomination comments:

Verdict

I don't know. Does it belong to a LEGO theme, because if so, it doesn't say on the article. Agent Charge 02:38, September 6, 2012 (UTC)

Gandalf the Grey

Nominated by: Jurassic park787 Vittoria per gli Assassini! 01:06, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Personally I would have nominated it for Class 1 article, but there's just this feeling I get when I read it that it is not good, however I feel that this STRONGLY needs to go up from a Class 4 article. Just look at it. It has a pretty lengthy description as well as many pictures of the physical and video game forms of Gandalf.

Verdict

Not Done. No description Agent Charge 02:34, September 6, 2012 (UTC)

6231 Speeda Demon

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:55, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I added description, background, prices, and bio.

Verdict

Brains

Nominated by: User:Drew1200/Sigifier
Nomination comments: I added a long description of all variations, improved the background, and checked for other mistakes.

Verdict

Rex (Power Miners)

Nominated by: User:Drew1200/Sigifier
Nomination comments: Improved background a bit.

Verdict

Part 3626bpb219

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Created page with complete infobox, list of appearances, a description and a part gallery.

Verdict

Done. User:SKP4472/sig3 18:22, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Part 48489

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Added a better infobox image, a list of variations with images to go with them, a complete list of appearances, a description and more.

Verdict

Done. User:SKP4472/sig3 18:32, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

6216 Jawblade

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:04, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Extended page.

Verdict

6229 XT4

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:12, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I thought I nominated this before…it isn't on the archived page…

Verdict

6293 Furno

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:12, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Added the background.

Verdict

Not Done. I don't see the background, but on top of that there isn't an original description. Berrybrick 19:38, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, someone took it out. I've changed the page back, and I'd like to re-nominate the article.User:Agent Fuse/sig 02:12, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Part 973pb1191c01

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Created page with complete infobox, a description, a complete list of appearances and an external links section.

Verdict

4648933 Accessory Pack

Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 03:42, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I wrote a descriptive description…the set wouldn't have a background, as it's just a booster pack. I can't find any prices, however…it is a future set, apparently, though.

Verdict

Clone Aerial Trooper

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Added a large description, a gallery, an external links section and vastly expanded the background.

Verdict

Done. BobaFett2 'did' it. Agent Charge 05:28, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Inventory:Clone Aerial Trooper

Nominated by: ~~Jeyo~~ Lord Vladek Talk The Forge
Nomination comments: Created page into completion. I'm not sure about the red links though...do they count against it? The page is complete but a lot of the parts listed don't have pages yet.

Verdict

Part x1908px3

Nominated by: User:Legoboy9373/sig
Nomination comments: Added description, appearances and references sections.

Verdict

Contents

Proposals