Class 2
| Featured articles - Featured Article Nominations - Content Improvement - Articles for Rating |
This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.
| Requirements
Complete articles must...
|
|
To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:
| ||
|
All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed. | |||
Contents
Nominations
|
Submit a new nomination <createbox> width=30 break=yes prefix=Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 2/ preload=Template:AFR-preload-2 buttonlabel=Add new nomination </createbox> |
|---|
Note- Please use the above system for making future nominations. The below nomination procedure is in the process of being phase out.
4479 TIE Bomber
- Nominated by:
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge - Nomination comments: Added description, background and notes section.
- Verdict
C3, yes, C2, not sure. I think the article could do with more of a description and the note in the notes section should probably be in the background section. User:SKP4472/sig3 20:24, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. Also, it doesn't describe the cannon or how it's fired. If it's still there in 5 days or so when I can go back to promoting articles, I'll try and fix it up. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. Yeah, I don't have the set; I was just going by my observations of the image and what I knew of the normal TIE fighter set. When I edit pages like that, I leave out all that I'm unsure of.
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
- Okay. Yeah, I don't have the set; I was just going by my observations of the image and what I knew of the normal TIE fighter set. When I edit pages like that, I leave out all that I'm unsure of.
6218 Splitface
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 04:33, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Researched and added background and description.
- Verdict
- I'm a little confused about the background- half of it's italic, and the background should also be original. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
Lizaru
- Nominated by: User:LegoRokz112/Sig1
- Nomination comments:Added large Description section, added correct photo, changed Background.
- Verdict
852759 LEGO Ruler
- Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig2
- Nomination comments:
- Verdict
- I don't know. Does it belong to a LEGO theme, because if so, it doesn't say on the article. Agent Charge 02:38, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
6231 Speeda Demon
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:55, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I added description, background, prices, and bio.
- Verdict
6216 Jawblade
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:04, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Extended page.
- Verdict
6229 XT4
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:12, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I thought I nominated this before…it isn't on the archived page…
- Verdict
6293 Furno
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:12, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Added the background.
- Verdict
Not Done. I don't see the background, but on top of that there isn't an original description. Berrybrick 19:38, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, someone took it out. I've changed the page back, and I'd like to re-nominate the article.User:Agent Fuse/sig 02:12, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
4648933 Accessory Pack
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 03:42, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I wrote a descriptive description…the set wouldn't have a background, as it's just a booster pack. I can't find any prices, however…it is a future set, apparently, though.
- Verdict
Inventory:Clone Aerial Trooper
- Nominated by:
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge - Nomination comments: Created page into completion. I'm not sure about the red links though...do they count against it? The page is complete but a lot of the parts listed don't have pages yet.
- Verdict
- I was under the impression that accessories weren't meant to be included in minifigure inventories :S Redlinked parts- I don't know, I just avoid rating them in those cases :P NovaHawk 04:06, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm...there's nothing on the MoS that addresses either of those points. Is this a large enough question to raise a forum about?
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
- Hmm...there's nothing on the MoS that addresses either of those points. Is this a large enough question to raise a forum about?
Part x1908px3
- Nominated by: User:Legoboy9373/sig
- Nomination comments: Added description, appearances and references sections.
- Verdict
Not Done. Needs expanding. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
Part x1741
- Nominated by: User:Legoboy9373/sig
- Nomination comments: I think it's good for Class 2.
- Verdict
Done. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
Part 98140pb03
- Nominated by: User:Legoboy9373/sig 14:07, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Added description, appearances and external link(s) sections.
- Verdict
Not Done. Needs expanding. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature