Class 2
| Featured articles - Featured Article Nominations - Content Improvement - Articles for Rating |
This page is for proposing articles for promotion to Class 2 status. In Brickipedia, completeness, or Class 2, is the minimum quality level that every article should eventually reach. Only the members of the Quality Check Group are allowed to grant completeness status to articles without any consultation. However, every user is allowed to nominate an article on this page. It will then be reviewed by a check group member who either approves or rejects the proposal.
| Requirements
Complete articles must...
|
|
To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:
| ||
|
All entries should be moved to the archive after being reviewed. | |||
Contents
Nominations
|
Submit a new nomination <createbox> width=30 break=yes prefix=Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 2/ preload=Template:AFR-preload-2 buttonlabel=Add new nomination </createbox> |
|---|
Recently Closed Nominations
Below is a list of the ten most recently closed nominations. If you have made changes to the article after a verdict was given and wish to request it to be re-rated, please remove the |A from the AFRHeader template at the top.
Note- Please use the above system for making future nominations. The below nomination procedure is in the process of being phase out.
4479 TIE Bomber
- Nominated by:
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge - Nomination comments: Added description, background and notes section.
- Verdict
C3, yes, C2, not sure. I think the article could do with more of a description and the note in the notes section should probably be in the background section. User:SKP4472/sig3 20:24, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. Also, it doesn't describe the cannon or how it's fired. If it's still there in 5 days or so when I can go back to promoting articles, I'll try and fix it up. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. Yeah, I don't have the set; I was just going by my observations of the image and what I knew of the normal TIE fighter set. When I edit pages like that, I leave out all that I'm unsure of.
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
- Okay. Yeah, I don't have the set; I was just going by my observations of the image and what I knew of the normal TIE fighter set. When I edit pages like that, I leave out all that I'm unsure of.
6218 Splitface
- Nominated by: User:Agent Fuse/sig 04:33, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Researched and added background and description.
- Verdict
- I'm a little confused about the background- half of it's italic, and the background should also be original. NovaHawk 06:48, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
Lizaru
- Nominated by: User:LegoRokz112/Sig1
- Nomination comments:Added large Description section, added correct photo, changed Background.
- Verdict
852759 LEGO Ruler
- Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig2
- Nomination comments:
- Verdict
- I don't know. Does it belong to a LEGO theme, because if so, it doesn't say on the article. Agent Charge 02:38, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
9496_Desert_Skiff
- Nominated by: User:SuperSpyX/Sig2
- Nomination comments: Added description of set, article looks complete.
- Verdict
Not Done. needs a background NovaHawk 23:04, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
Part 98140pb01
- Nominated by: User:Legoboy9373/sig
- Nomination comments: Added description , appearances and external links sections. Also did some minor fixes.
- Verdict
Not much of a description...--Jeyo
Done. It doesn't need a description. Berrybrick 12:14, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
5981 Raid VPR
- Nominated by: -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:20, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Fairly detailed description, contains background and galleries. For a small set, it seems alright for C2.
- Verdict
- (You may want to read the big huge red lettering on this page.) Umm... neutral for me, I'd say it's nearly there if it isn't already, I just think the description could do with a minor cleanup (eg, "The cockpit of the Raid VPR is only quite small") NovaHawk 07:32, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay (sorry about not reading the red sentence above, I'll know next time). -User:Power Jim/sigcode 11:56, September 29, 2012 (UTC)