DUPLO Land

Articles for Rating → Featured article nominations → DUPLO Land

DUPLO Land

• Nominated by: ~ CJC 23:51, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: My last proper editing for a long long time (hopefully). Currently a C4.

Vote score: -2, Technical Check: Currently OK

Support

1. I can think of no finer legacy. (you'll have to update it in 2013, though. :P) User:Cligra/Sig

Make Class 1 instead (this counts as an oppose to FA, but a support for C1)

Object

1. C2 given. Reasons for oppose:
   • 2 redlinks. Redlinks in FA=bad. And I have no idea what to write for the articles.
   • DUPLO_Land#Shows- features a (????). Is it because it's a future release, or it's unknown when it started? Personally I just think stating a reason is better than four ?'s. Other than that, I have no reason to oppose NovaHawk 18:08, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

     That is because I have no clue what year they started. ~ CJC 20:00, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

2. ^ klagoer 18:37, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
3. ^ Berrybrick 18:51, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)

Comments

• ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ~ CJC 19:17, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
• I've looked over the article, compared it with the class 1 standard, and think that it meets that... Would anyone object to this being closed, and the article given c1 status? Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:50, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nope. User:Darth henry/Sig