Old discussions

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

This page is an archive of past FA nominations.

Old votes

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

Hogwarts

  • Nominated by: User:LegOtaku/sig 08:56, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Provides a collection of information that may not be found anywhere else and has considerable content.

(+4 Revs/+4 Users/+8 Total)

Support
  1. Imperial guards.png NovaHawk 23:48, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperial guards.png User:Cpatain Rex/sig 06:14, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Great! Clone Commander Fox 17:52, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
  4. User:Samdo994/sig2 12:53, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Awesome!User:BobaFett2/sig2
  6. -- WHAT?!?! User:Eddlikeshotsauce KABOOM 16:26, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Imperial guards.png Ajraddatz Talk 14:44, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Imperial guards.png -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON!Maverick.jpg 15:19, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
Object
Comments

I know, that this article still has a GA nomination going. But I think its quality level is sufficient for FA. --User:LegOtaku/sig 08:56, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

  • I think this article needs some more images included, it looks somewhat bare... User:Samdo994/sig209:01, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

** I agree with Samdo, it could use a few other images NovaHawk 07:51, January 9, 2010 (UTC) Approved as featured article 01:02, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

LEGO Duck

  • Nominated by: -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON!Maverick.jpg 13:53, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Though it does not go with the manual of style too well, it is still a very good article with an image of a set from the 1930s, plus descriptive information.

(-4 Revs/-2 Users/-6 Total)

Support
  1. Even though the article does not have much content,it is still pretty unique.-- WHAT?!?! User:Eddlikeshotsauce KABOOM 16:25, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Object
  1. Imperial guards.png This would not even pass as GA. In particular, it does not meet 4, 8 and possibly 2. (btw, nominators are not allowed to vote.) --User:LegOtaku/sig 15:44, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, it's just too short. Imperial guards.png NovaHawk 21:49, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Way too short!!! Clone Commander Fox 17:51, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Per Nighthawk User:CaptainJag/sig1 05:43, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Imperial guards.png User:Cpatain Rex/sig 01:32, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Imperial guards.png Per above. Ajraddatz Talk 15:50, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
  7. To short to even be complete. Unsigned comment by BobaFett2 (talk • contribs).
Comments
  1. It's very short.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:57, February 15, 2010 (UTC)


Vote to remove nomination (rev only)

  1. Imperial guards.png NovaHawk 02:51, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperial guards.png Ajraddatz Talk 13:55, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Imperial guards.png User:LegOtaku/sig 14:38, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Just get it out of my sight! :P Imperial guards.png -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON!Maverick.jpg 15:19, March 20, 2010 (UTC)