updates 2

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
< Brickipedia:Manual of Style
Revision as of 09:34, 15 October 2010 by NovaFlare (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This page serves as an archive for former votes and discussions about additions to the Manual of Style that were conducted at [[Forum:MOS proposal…")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This page serves as an archive for former votes and discussions about additions to the Manual of Style that were conducted at Forum:MOS proposals.

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Continue to use the /

Prices

Hello. I would like to propose that if multiple prices exist in an infobox, that they be changed from US $45.00 / CA $400,000 to US $45.00<br/>CA $400,000. Any comments? Ajraddatz Talk 13:04, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Hm, I think it sounds like an okey idea, but I think I would need to see it on a fairly fully filled out infobox before I support it.. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 14:49, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I think this would make the infobox unnecessarily longer, and since we have already got the appearances, themes and minifigures with a break, I'd say no, for now. User:Samdo994/sig2 19:23, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
It looks so much more prettyful though. Ajraddatz Talk 14:48, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, at present, I think I'd have to oppose. NovaHawk 00:35, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

I've added it to one page to see what you think. In my opinion, it make the infobox look more professional. That is just my opinion, though. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:42, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, still not a big fan of it, but I don't know why, and I can see arguments for having it like this. The only reason I can say against it is it does make the infobox a lot longer. NovaHawk 06:52, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Voting

Continue using /

  1. NovaHawk 06:46, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
  2. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:52, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
  3. User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:56, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Use <br/>


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was continue to use the set number

In the title section of the infobox put the set number

Support

  1. --LEGOCityManiac11 18:22, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. We have a separate section for the item number already NovaHawk 23:22, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:38, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. We're talking about the Template:Set, right? I think it's okay the way it is now. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:42, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 16:40, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

How about a comprimise where by the item number section is removed and the set number is added to the title. Just an idea please don't be mad. User:SKP4472/sig 16:30, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

... more about "Manual of Style/updates 2"
Has parent pageThis property is a special property in this wiki.