This page is for any requests to become a member of the Quality Check Group.

To prevent excessive nominations, there is an edit and time requirement for the user to be eligible to make a request. The user must have made at least 100 mainspace edits, and have been on the wiki for at least one week. They should also have shown some experience in voting/successfully nominating articles for featured articles, Class 1 articles, and/or Class 2 articles. If the request is unsuccessful, the user will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date the request concluded. For a request to pass, there must be at least a +3 vote count and a 60 percent positive vote percentage.

A requester may withdraw their request at any time throughout the process, but will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date of withdrawl if the overall vote score is less than zero.

How to make a request

To make a request, use the following syntax:

=={{u|(your username)}}, Requested ~~~~~==
'''Request comments:''' (any comments here)
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Comments===

After one week, an admin who is also a QCG member will close the request and notify you of the result. An archive of past requests can be seen here.

Please note, only members of the Quality Check Group are permitted to vote, and should use {{RG}} before signing.

Requests

Vasko (Legoboy9373), Requested 11:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Request comments: I had put up a request about two months ago on the site hosted by Wikia, but unfortunately, nobody saw it. I decided to postpone it, and I thought that now was the time to put it up again.

I think I am ready to join this group since I have gathered quite some experience and have improved a lot of pages (I do think so). Thank you in advance. Vasko (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Support

I don't see why not. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Berrybrick (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
(thought I already voted on this) NovaHawk 04:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Ajraddatz (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

CJC95, Requested 20:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Request comments: Was a member of the preceding group, I have more experience editing than all but one of the current members, am more active then 90% of them, and although haven't nominated much, its clear that I can write good articles, and can spot ones that are just horrible. CJC95 (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Support

ok --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Berrybrick (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
NovaHawk 21:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments