Archive

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful LFY1547 LFY1547 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (27 edits, 962 mainspace) I'm still fairly active here and almost always checking up on RecentChanges or #cvn-brickimedia. Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made a few thousand contributions to articles here? Yes. I've been active on the wiki since late June last year, and have since made over 1,200 mainspace edits with both of my accounts (235 on my previous one). Do you regularly participate on the forums? Yes. I give my opinion on nearly every forum if I get the chance to. Do you revert vandalism when you see it, or tag pages for deletion? Yes. I have reverted vandalism multiple times since becoming active and I have tagged plenty of review pages for deletion recently. I also have experience with undoing vandalism on Wikia, where I do it globally. Are you bothered? When it's needed, I often help. A recent example of this I can provide is while I was working on articles at LMBW, I was asked to tag any empty review pages I found for deletion. I'm willing to help out the wiki whenever it is needed. (although sometimes I'm not around when it is needed. :P) Thanks for your vote, whether it be a support or oppose, I always like to know what I can improve on. :) -LFY1547 00:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Support Support. Known him for a long time and I'm quite sure he could be trusted with administrator rights. Klintrin (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose I'd say you're close, but not there yet. You have good judgement and don't have difficulty editing. My primary concern is your activity. You can fluctuate from very active to long periods of inactivity with short or no notice. You also say you'll start editing again "soon" but often times never do... Something I rarely see in your edits is content creation, which is something you should be active in as an administrator. My suggestion would be to wait a few months before requesting adminship and be continuously active in editing. Possibly try to involve yourself in content improvement and after some time try to join the quality check group. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Completely understood. :-) I'll work on it. Thanks for the response! -LFY1547 01:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I just can't support anyone if they've only done 12 mainspace edits this month. Not that any of us current admins having been doing anything great either, but for me to actually support admin rights, they'd have to be pretty regular in the mainspace NovaHawk 01:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Per my above reply, understood and working on it :-) Thanks for the response -LFY1547 01:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Per NovaFlare. Although it's extremely hypocritical coming from myself as I barely edit these days, admins should be making lots of contributions and demonstrating that they are productive in counter-vandalism and taking part in forum discussions. I'm not saying you aren't doing these things, but you should continue to do this regularly. Other than that I feel that you are a promising candidate and I wish you luck for the next time you choose to apply for adminship. Until then, keep up the good work. :) SKP4472 (Admin) 21:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Pass BrickfilmNut BrickfilmNut (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,265 edits, 2,976 mainspace) So, wow, this is finally happening. :P Anyway, I definitely believe that I am ready for sysop rights. I am an active contributor, am online at a variety of hours, and have faced many situations in which I could make good use of the rights. I also have proven myself trustworthy with rights usage both at Brickipedia, where I have chat moderator, rollback, patroller, and CQM rights, and at a variety of other wikis where I possess admin and/or 'crat rights. With sysop rights at Brickipedia, I feel that I can expand my role as a Brickipedia editor, and I am hopeful that this request will pass. BrickfilmNut (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Support Berrybrick (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC) One of the most trustworthy Brickipedians I know. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Absolutely. BFN is one of the most mature and trustworthy people here. Full support. -LFY1547 18:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Of course! Ajraddatz (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC) I'd trust him with the rights! Clone gunner commander jedi talk About time. -Klint Finally. CJC95 (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC) YES. Jeyo (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC) I laughed when I saw this. I was just surprised I hadn't thought to nominate him already. Drew1200 (talk) Good guy, can take on the role easily, great person, and a pleasure to contribute with you on here. -Czech Yes, just yes. -SirComputer (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC) I've known this was going to happen since before June. MsD (Talk) 21:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC) I can finally stop nagging tou to make a request :D NovaHawk 18:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC) I've been asking him to do this for a while.BobaFett2 (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Per all above. Vasko (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC) I thought I supported this already, then flipped out because I realize that I actually didn't support yet. User:LazerzSoH/signature I have trusted BFN many times, and i think he is the admin-like people who don't get angry at me or kick me for my warped attitude. He would even be perfect for admin because he technically acts like one. Also, per LazerzSoH. --King Kahuka (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Oppose Comments