1999bug

1999bug (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,928 edits, 557 mainspace)

Since chat has been reactivated, I feel as if I may have a chance this time. I will be on chat often now, so it's all but expected that I can monitor it. I won't ban people unless they have been warned at least twice. I have also read over the guidelines for chat and, as they state, I shall kickban sparingly.

Support

Will be a ~~bad~~ great chat mod, deserves this. --L o r d S h u 03:07, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Has never done anything wrong. -- Power Jim Talk [[User Blog: Power Jim|User blog:Power Jim Embrace the power!]] 03:08, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
I know him very well, and he would be a great moderator. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
Yup. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster
Cheese.--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:12, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Weak support, some concerns and not entirely sure why you supported yourself... not that it matters really but still :p User:Ajraddatz/sig 05:13, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Week Support He's a great ChatMod, but I'm not entirely sure he would handle Brickipedia right at first. THIS VOTE MAY CHANGE!!! Drewlzoo^{(talk) (blogs)}

Neutral

Oppose

Weak Oppose - Please do not take this in a wrong way, but maybe if user matures a bit more.... I don't think he's ready to handle these rights "just" yet. User:Skdhjf/SigT 03:24, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Well, at least it's a weak oppose. You could have said worse. I respect that. -Bug

Per Tat. User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

Supported myself because I can. >=D =P Jk. Want me to remove it? -Bug

Removed. -Bug

Ajr, if it's support, it's support. =P -Bug