Archive4

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

BobaFett2

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

BobaFett2 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (105 edits, 15,766 mainspace)

So, back after a long hiatus. I apologize for that thing I said before, I definitely should not have said it - but I'd rather not bring it up any more. I have changed quite a bit, and I've encountered a few situations recently where the tools that an administrator possesses would be helpful in editing, and I suspect that I'll find more situations like that. If you think that I should wait longer, that's fine. I will reapply in the future, I just feel that the tools would be helpful now. - BF2 Talk 21:44, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Weak support; In all honesty, you haven't changed a lot--some of things you bluntly say are often offensive to users, even if you don't mean them so. However, editing-wise, you were and probably still are one of the best. I support on these grounds, as, really, editing like the kind Boba does is more important for an encyclopedia than user-relations. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:48, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Jeyo. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:59, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Jeyo. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  4. Per Jeyo, somewhat. I do think that you have changed, and I believe you're willing to change, too. You're great with editing, and I think you could be trusted with these rights. --LFY talk contribs 23:45, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
  5. OK. ~ CJC 11:15, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Jeyo. Berrybrick 13:59, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per Jeyo, but I thought you already were an admin? Why can't you just get them back? --- CM4S (talk) 14:14, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Forum:Desysop is why. --LFY talk contribs 15:39, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Oh. Well... that changes things. --- CM4S (talk) 18:32, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
    That was what the whole first three sentences were for. I'd like to put that behind me. - BF2 Talk 00:24, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
  8. As always, Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:53, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Never seen him mess up while I've known him. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 17:59, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  10. Per Jeyo. «†J•cI•u•cI•€•<|2()†» (Wall) 
  11. Per Jeyo. --Silence, Doctor (talk) 00:24, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
  12. User:Legoboy9373/sig 11:39, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
  13. Per Jeyo. Legosuperheroesfan (talk) 12:23, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
  14. Per Jeyo really. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  15. He helps me a lot with my MOCs.. he helps other people with other stuff too (least i think so), so i dont think theres no reason WHY NOT!? So yeah, boba for admin. User:Korppufin 13.10.2013 19:38 Finnish time.. something
  16. An editor who is willing to do the extremely boring magazine things. :P User:Darth henry/Sig 23:44, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
  17. User:Captain Jag/sig1 05:26, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


LSCStealthNinja (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

LSCStealthNinja (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Ok. So... I feel that I am ready and worthy of being an Administrator. I've been here since January 18, 2012 (almost 2011) and I've contributed as much as I can and tried to be as active as much as I can. I'm also active on both of the Forums. The last time I was nominated was shortly after I became a Chat Moderator and I jumped ahead. I have 6,000 edits with 3,000 mainspace. (Hopefully :P) Like most of you, I don't focus on badges or how many edits I have, but the quality of edits. I have also made quite a bit (haven't updated that in a while) of C2s, C3s, and pages. I feel that I am ready to be an Administrator because of how much I've contributed to Brickipedia, and I hope you guys agree. Thanks, User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:08, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. User:NuffSaid/Sig
  2. Yes. I feel you're ready, you're quite active and mature. --Legøfanyøda 22:12, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Sure. Not someone I'd have considered until now (sorry :P), but they are calm and are familiar with editing, so why not? ~ CJC 22:14, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  4. TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    22:41, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 22:42, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Active and mature. User:Darth henry/Sig 18:46, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Why isn't he? --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 19:42, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  8. As per CJC really, every experience I've had with you has been pleasurable. Very good with editing and communication, got my vote. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:41, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Per above. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  10. Yes. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  11. Definitely wasn't expecting this, but no real concerns that I can see. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
  12. I'm glad to see he's back. Very mature, and could make good use of the tools. Drewlzoo
  13. Good user, and I personally don't have any problems with inactivity; no harm comes when he is gone, and he could make very beneficial use of the tools whenever he is around. BrickfilmNut (talk) 00:22, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. The only major issue I have is inactivity; LSC's been known to depart for long stretches of time. However, he's also a fine, level-headed editor who's certainly been here long enough. So neutral, really. I might switch to support in the future. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:21, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  2. So many surprises this week, :P. No, but, LSC, I really don't think you're, ready. If I recall, you took a (few) long breaks from the wiki, no one really knew if you were coming back or not, which isn't good. If you're going to become an admin, you need be active. Plan on doing so, and I'll support you. We need some new admins... :P --- CM4S (talk) 22:24, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
    If you recall :P, in the Summer I was on for almost half or 3/4ths of the day. :P --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:35, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Having looked at your mainspace edit percentage I saw only 52.07% of your edits were devoted to mainspace. Yea, I know I am like the only one who ever looks at that but I would like to see some more mainspace editing. At least 55%. Other than that I think you have my support but I would just like to see more mainspace work. Also more activity. Klagoer
    I understand. But being a Custom Quality Moderator, some of the percentage is devoted to the Custom mainspace, along with uploading pictures/File mainspace. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:58, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Just the inactivity is a bit of a problem, but if he proves that he is more active now, I will switch to support. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:39, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I want to support, but the activity is still an issue. I think I've only seen you online once since this request. :/ Berrybrick 16:25, September 22, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • To everyone who says I was inactive: I do realize I was inactive for a while, however, I posted on my user page an estimate of when I would be back. I was only gone because I was moving from Florida to Washington, and with the new school and finals and such. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:33, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
Also, I have aboslutely no intention of going inactive again in the future, unless it is an extremely serious reason. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:34, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  • Maybe you should wait until Brickimedia? -->SkyDrift< 10:29, September 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Done
Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:57, September 28, 2013 (UTC)


Legoboy9373

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Legoboy9373 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I feel, as does CJC and probably some others, that I am ready for these rights. Living in a time zone in which not many other users do, as of what I know, makes me one of the only editors at the time I am online. I have over twelve thousand edits, over nine thousand of them mainspace. I'm pretty sure I have matured a lot since the beginning of this year and hence I have stopped making useless edits, etc. One year ago, and some time afterwards, I mostly used to make useless edits, for example adding links, etc. Now I try making good ones: improving the vocabulary, fixing grammar mistakes, and more. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:02, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. I think Legoboy's ready for admin. the only black mark on his record is making useless edits to get badges, something which is in the fairly distant past now, and I think that's been addressed pretty well. As he stated in his intro, he's on when most users are not. It's true that he hasn't had much experience user-relations-wise, but seeing as he isn't on chat all that much (that I know of) and mainly sticks to mainspace editing, I'm sure he could benefit the wiki using these rights. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:09, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I never really thought of him as an admin before, but now that he is requesting the rights, I can't see why not. Mostly per Jeyo, but I have seen him on chat pretty frequently and he is as friendly and level-headed as ever. Berrybrick 10:18, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ToaMeiko (talk) 10:37, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Edits. Is Friendly. What more could you want? ~ CJC 11:39, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. This nom took me by surprise, but sure, why not. The only thing I'd suggest is maybe having a bit more community input in administrative forums (although, there's nothing really running right now :D) NovaHawk 23:27, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per CJC. BrickfilmNut (talk) 23:28, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per Berry. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 23:29, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Level-headed and a good editor. I support. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 23:50, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Fantastic editor. I know he applied on Brickimedia when nobody was looking and the request only go a couple of supports, so I recommended that he postpone it. Really, I have no complaints with this. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:48, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  10. Good editor, and from what I've seen from him, he's quite mature. Definite support. :) --Legøfanyøda 21:08, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  11. Gosh, 73.1% of his edits here are mainspace! Definite support. Klagoer
  12. Definite yes. User:Darth henry/Sig 18:46, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  13. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  14. As per others, definitely deserving. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:41, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
  15. Per all. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  16. Per CJC. You're an excellent user Legoboy, keep it up! :) User:SKP4472/sig3 19:12, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
  17. Yes. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  18. This is too obvious. YES User:NuffSaid/Sig

Neutral

  1. Wow, this was a surprise. I haven't really gotten to know this guy well. I've seen him edit from time to time, but admin? I don't necessarily think he's ready. That may just be because I've never talked to him much. I don't really know which side to lean on, but this was sudden. Looks like you're going to win though - I know you'll become a great admin! --- CM4S (talk) 00:41, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I haven't really seen him all to much, but I'm leaning towards support from the times I have seen him. Vote is subject to change. --Legøfanyøda 00:52, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
    Switching to support. --Legøfanyøda 21:08, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Seems really sudden, but I am sure you'll make a great admin. --User:CzechMate/czech 00:54, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

(Switching to oppose. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 19:41, September 15, 2013 (UTC))

  1. I don't know which Legoboy this is, as there's tons, so I'll just go neutral for now. --Knight

Oppose

  1. I think he needs to be a bit more friendly. Other than that, I'm fine.
    TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    I don't understand how I'm not friendly, as most people in the Support section said I am, plus, I don't think it is a valid reason to oppose. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:36, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    Yeah, I'm confused. :/ Berrybrick 19:43, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    I'd say it's a valid reason to oppose, but there needs to be some sort of evidence of it. How is Legoboy not friendly? Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:12, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per TKOTW --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 19:40, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    whos that? RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    MSD. ~ CJC 17:22, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
    No hes TKOTW, whos KOFTW? RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  3. Hes already a chatnod, I think hes good and shouldnt be an admin User:Saburo954/Sig
    Best reason to oppose! </sarcasm> User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:47, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
    Why do you think that, Saburo? Because you haven't actually given a reason. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 17:43, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just asking, but if some of you in the neutral section are sure that he'll be a great admin, why not support? Berrybrick 00:54, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Done
- Sorry I didn't get to this two days ago. Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:56, September 28, 2013 (UTC)


ToaMeiko (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,085 mainspace)

I am nominating ToaMeiko today for administrator for several reasons:

  • Meiko has shown he understands how to use the rights, such as on Brickimedia, and other sites.
  • Meiko currently operates the chat's bot, and is dedicated to keeping it up, by using some of his own time, showing he WILL care to stay active and help whenever.
  • Meiko has matured a LOT since his last RFA, and now shows great work in anti-conflict matters.[1]

Yes, I imagine *some* users will oppose this for other reasons but think: Meiko is active, edits daily, and strives to be a great user. Hate on him all you want, but he is helping the wiki advance in many ways.

--User:CzechMate/czech 23:51, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator --User:CzechMate/czech 23:51, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per whatever I might have said last time. Which, now that I look back at it, wasn't a reason at all. In any case, I think it would work out with him. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 00:36, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. OK with this at this point. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:26, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Yes. Just no more flip-outs. User:Darth henry/Sig 00:45, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Ehhh...he's gotten better I will say yes for now but I might change my mind just per darth henry no more flip outs. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  6. NovaHawk 01:10, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Klagoer
  8. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 01:46, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Jpw150 (talk) 03:17, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  10. --Dragonknight86 (talk) 04:42, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  11. Seems very dedicated to the wiki, I support Meiko. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:53, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  12. OK ~ CJC 09:13, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  13. Never had a problem with Meiko and he's a brilliant guy to talk how and is an asset to the Wiki for all his work and contributions. Good luck! User:SKP4472/sig3 20:52, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  14. I honestly agree with some of Knight's points and there are things about this whole CM4S situation I have never understood (right from the beginning) but after considering it for however long this has been up, I've decided to support. I don't think that he'll abuse the rights, which he can definitely use, so even if he proves unfit (which I doubt will happen) little damage will be done. Berrybrick 22:55, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  15. Very rational and cool-headed, has a passion for what he does, and extremely knowledgeable, making him a very well-rounded candidate for administrator. Best of luck, George! -maestro35, the one and only
    He has certainly matured and I think he is fit for adminship. BlueJay11 (talk) 23:22, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Struck; less than 100 ms edits. MsDtalk 23:25, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Again, only admins can strike...especially on RFAs and such. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:26, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    It's not like I'm breaking some major rule. An admin would've done it anyways, so what's the point of not doing it? MsDtalk 23:28, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  16. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:02, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  17. As per the blog, I feel he has the maturity and experience to become a great administrator. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 15:43, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  18. Per all. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:45, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  19. Per BFN. NuffSaid
  20. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  21. Sure! User:LazerzSoH/signature
  22. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 22:18, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  23. Oh absolutely. --Legøfanyøda 01:14, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  24. I was impressed. - BF2 Talk 17:19, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  25. He accepted me back even though he really shouldn't have :). He deserves all the support! --Village.gw105 (talk) 18:26, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    Notice to administrators: This account is the new account of former user Legodude101 (editcount), thus this vote is valid due to his previous account meeting the 100 mainspace edit requirement. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:28, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    Wait, we're not banning him this time? Can someone explain this to me? --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 18:31, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    Because he's shown the willingness and ability to improve, thus we gave him a second chance. He's been doing fine since. If you have further questions about it, let me know on my talk page. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:34, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    You didn't notify me earlier. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 18:41, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    Is an apology really all it takes to be forgiven? Wow, that's easy. :) --- CM4S (talk) 18:46, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    Not necessarily. The willingness is a big part. He realized exactly what he did wrong, and acknowledged to his mistakes. He realized that we (the moderators, and specifically myself), were not people he should be mad at. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:48, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't know anything about this case, but we've never really banned people who come back changed, like when you did last time :P ~ CJC 18:53, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't think he was ever banned indefinitely either. Berrybrick 19:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    I checked, he would be unblocked in October. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 19:07, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  26. Full support, his dedication to the wiki is great. --Brick bobby talk What has wikis ever done for us?! 20:08, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
  27. Full support, I totally support Meiko for admin. He's shown that he has a very good knowledge of the wiki and LEGO. -Batgirl78 :)

Neutral

  1. The users Meiko has been conflicting with, for the most part, are less beneficial to the wiki than he is. I've revoked my opposing vote and I'd like to see how he'd do with this. If it turns out badly, the rights can be removed. If not, we've gained a good admin. So I'll just sit back and watch this sail through. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 00:56, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Excellent knowledge of the wiki and coding, but can work on self-control. MsDtalk 00:20, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I appreciate his work on Brickimedia, and has helped a lot, but he still has seemed not the best person, but I'm sure he can handle it, and if he can't, B-Crats can always ban him. —Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
    *demote --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:06, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Per Knight. I want to Support but I feel both CM4S or Meiko would be the reason of either. -NuffSaid
    Why does all this need to be based upon CM4S? This is Meiko's request for admin, not CM4S's. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:16, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I'm unfamiliar with the user, but I'm still going to vote. - BF2 Talk 03:48, September 5, 2013 (UTC) Changed to support
    We need to get to know each other then! :o Too bad chat's down now, but if you want we can meet up on IRC or on my test wiki chat. :3 --ToaMeiko (talk) 03:51, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I'm still not ok with this. Sure, Meiko's done great things for Bricki, but also has a few issues. Not sure if he can handle it. --- CM4S (talk) 18:45, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  5. This was really a tough decision for me. I would oppose, but I know that between all of his free time, and his skills, Meiko could be a great help to this wiki. With that in mind, I would support, but I've really had a terrible past with him. There's just all kinds of horrible stuff I've seen him do, that just makes me not be able to support him. Leaning back towards oppose, I also remember that he's not a troll, and while he may have some issues similar to one, he really does desire to better this wiki. Thus, I'm just going to have to vote neutral. Drewlzoo

Oppose

  1. Switching due to suspicions and this: "3:50 ToaMeiko Brickipedia:Requests for Administrator - Advertisement to those with over 100 mainspace edits. :U" MsDtalk 20:53, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    This is invalid and should be struck. It's not canvassing, as I did not tell a user to vote in a specific manner. I was simply following a joke CJC and SKP had made. "CJC95: Advertisement to BCG and LMBWers who just joined User blog:CJC95/2014 rumours" and "SKP4472: Going to copy CJC now :P : Advertisement to BCG and LMBWers who just joined http://www.ClickaBrick.co.uk/ " --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Still makes me iffy. And anyways, the suspicions CM4S pointed out were very valid. MsDtalk 20:57, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    What suspicions...? That he's upset because Czech and all the admins voted he be blocked on the admin wiki, thus he takes his frustration out on me because, as Czech said, CM4S doesn't like to see users newer than him get rights before he does? Yeah sure. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:59, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    No, the ones me and CM4S pointed out to Jeyo. MsDtalk 21:00, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Which are...? --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:01, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    No vote has taken placed at the admin wiki. ~ CJC 21:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    According to Jeyo and Czech there was. Either way, this opposition reason is still based on cherrypicking for faults, by accusing me of canvassing when it was clearly a joke. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:16, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Agreed, but I'd like to clear up an inaccuracy. ~ CJC 21:20, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair, as I was misinformed on the admin wiki discussion. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:21, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    MsD, do you have an actual reason or not? You aren't giving one. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:01, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Yes, did I not give two in my opposition in the first place? "suspicions" and the link thing. MsDtalk 22:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Suspicions of? ~ CJC 22:49, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Per CJC. Still would like to know what these suspicions are. --ToaMeiko (talk) 04:48, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
    No, I do not think you are ready to be admin. I'm sorry. This has nothing to do with CM4S' block. I think you are not able to cooperate with users who have anger issues. You were a jerk to CM4S, always. You said you tried to be better, but you didn't. If you could be friendly to him and ignore any mean things he says, he's an easy person to become friends with. Two minor admins had to give you guidelines for things to work for Orlan's sake. You could be like this to any user. And how many times have you been blocked on LMBW? A lot. I don't care how strict their rules can be. I don't want an admin who has been blocked anywhere else. And lastly, on chat, you link inappropriate stuff and very controversial stuff. Even reading by the titles, they shouldn't be linked. Why would I want an admin like? --Knight
    I'd also like to add a quote I made last night, not in exact words, but whatever.
    "Meiko is a perfect person. Perfect people are not perfect, but they are just people who act like they are the most talented. Everyone likes perfect people. Because they are so perfect. Perfect people hate imperfection and will try to make it look like they are perfect. And if anyone does not like a perfect person, they will hunt him down and kill him. Perfect people want to be a leader in everything, so people will think they're more perfect. Perfect people do not understand respect. Perfect people do not understand empathy. Perfect people do not understand the truth. The people who understand these things are people who are disrespected. People who are unknown. And people who are different. Those are the only true people I would like as an admin." —Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
    Per Knight. Meiko I like you as a user but your actions after reviewing them with Knight and CM4S aren't Admin like. We need a leader, someone who doesn't just think the job is about pushing buttons. -Nuff
    I would actually argue that adminship is more about pushing buttons than being a leader, but whatever. :P Berrybrick 22:36, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    I'd also like to say these two opposers are two very close to CM4S, and one of them in particular raged a lot on chat last night, saying that nobody is allowed to talk about CM4S. And also, Knight, he was not a jerk to CM4S. CM4S swore at Meiko daily, raged at him, and personally attacked him. Meiko stood his ground, something CM4S could never do. And also - if you saay CM4S' past has nothing to do with it, why should Meiko's? Some food for thought. Oh, and Meio has been more active in the wiki than all three opposers. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    As someone who is a global admin on Wikimedia, an admin here and a few other major Wikia wikis... the job is actually about pushing buttons, and has very little to do with leadership. :P Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:39, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Yes, I understand that I'm not active in the wiki, but it isn't I who is running. Yes, CM4S has done these things to Meiko, but I understand that Meiko also has. They were both jerks to each other. Yelling and swearing at each other. Like an old couple. I don't think CM4S would make a good admin, either. I don't care if CM4S is blocked, we can still contact each other, but I don't trust Meiko as admin. But whatever, my opinion does not matter, anyway. --Knight
    I stopped provoking CM4S weeks ago after Jeyo told me to avoid contact with him. CM4S did not stop. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:45, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Knight, you also do not answer to my comment of the "past". And per Meiko - CM4S didn't stop provoking Meiko, pressuring him. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:48, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Oh and - Why are you all framing Meiko with this? Meiko has done so much for the community, so much good, such as helping with Brickimedia - heck - he WAS A SYSADMIN, and he isn't willing to stop helping out. What's for the better? Him being admin, and helping the site for years to come, or him being neglected the opportunity to further his contribution and dedication to the site because of one user who already got indefinitely blocked? Food for thought. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:50, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Just going to through this into the fire: If I would ever have trouble holding admin rights, that trouble would have already taken place. I had higher privileges than admins when I was sysadmin at Brickimedia, and I never abused them, not once. MeikoBot, right now, on this wiki, has sysop rights. I have not abused those. What makes you think I'd lose all sense of responsibility by editing with this account on Wikia? Pretty sure I can handle the rights. Per Czech highly, I do everything in my ability to better this site, as it's the best wiki I've ever been able to contribute to. I'd rather not be neglected the opportunity to help even more. Admin isn't just blocking, and blocking/banning is not something I ever like to do. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:53, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    One more thing, for all opposing votes and possible future oppositions, is that do not base it off of libelous statements like this. If you're getting an opinion from a blocked user who is likely very unhappy, chances are it's highly biased, so don't trust it, and certainly don't use it as justification for your own points. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:35, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    I have at last worked out my thoughts on this. While Meiko is a very beneficial editor and one who has left many a kind message on users' talk pages, lightly informing them of the rules, he also has been shown to be the opposite. Recently, there was the incident with Meiko, Bug, Knight and Nuff on chat. The latter few were told coldly, bluntly and suddenly to "stop spamming" after using hashtags before their sentences. They were not attempting to bother anyone, and Meiko's order sparked a good deal of anger. An argument ensued, an argument that left everyone angry and feeling wronged. There have also been previous instances of this, as well as the seemingly nonstop conflicts with MsD and Sci. Now, Meiko is a great editor, but one must wonder--does he really need these rights? user-relations-wise, I there's way too much controversy and a very rocky past. As an editor and chat moderator, he's fine. But I do not think these rights are needed, especially with the incident that happened just today. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 00:06, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Firstly, I want to explain to you that I can't deny Meiko's contributions to this wiki. What he has done is amazing, but he's only doing it to compensate for the grievances he's caused the community. In my opinion, these feats can't repair the damage that has ensued, no matter how hard he works to do so. Even with this ploy, he still manages to get caught up in crazy arguments and ends up hurting someone. Just today I had a small conflict with him. I don't want to go into detail because I found it ridiculous, but it ended up with several users other than myself feeling wronged only because of a single character added to a few words. Speaking from experience, I can tell you this is not the first time he's been so cold to other users such as myself. That being said, he's not only cold, but also acts tends to act inappropriate, making most of what he says hypocritical. He also has a bad habit of bringing up controversial subjects that the wiki purposely shies away from. I guess what I'm trying to get across is this-- user rights were considered a high honor and privilege, now they've been reduced to "just button pushing" as many of you have suggested. Only a year ago, we wouldn't have embarrassed ourselves by giving users who don't deserve these privileges what they want. I can agree that Meiko has improved, but barely. His past still shows and we need to stop denying it, it has helped shatter the community. User:1999bug/sig1 01:01, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    I'd also like to confirm that Bug does not have anything to do with CM4S. --Knight
    What? Oh, you mean the reason your oppose got struck. Gotcha. User:1999bug/sig1 02:01, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • User accepted via chat. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:51, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
    • I confirm to this. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:53, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Just a note that if this nom is successful and Meiko's Wikia-wide block is not repealed, he will still be given the admin flag so that when we move back to place where the people running the site don't have bags of coins in their heads where their brains should be, Meiko will be an admin on there. NovaHawk 23:14, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
    • I was just going to try and give him the flag on the blocked account XD ~ CJC 10:39, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Let us await Wikia complaining about us moving when it is there fault, once more. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:17, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

ToaMeiko

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,085 mainspace)

I've been told by several people I should do this. I personally would have held off, but after reading the requirements and the checklist, I realized I meet everything, and do everything on the checklist already. I'm one of the most active Brickipedians anymore, and am almost always patrolling the recent changes, wiki activity and new pages. I've familiarized myself with every Brickipedia policy, including their histories, and even check them frequently when undoing an edit or warning a user to make sure I am in fact making the proper decision. To go through the checklist:

  • Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made a few thousand contributions to articles here?
    Yes I have. Most of my edits come from minor fixes to pages, creating new pages, and reverting spam, vandalism, or other edits going against a policy, such as the MoS, category guidelines, etc.
  • Do you regularly participate on the forums?
    Yes I do. I don't post in all of them, but I check back on each board frequently for new threads and posts, and follow several to stay on track with them.
  • Do you revert vandalism when you see it, or tag pages for deletion?
    I do this one all the time. No matter who edits a page, I always check the difference between revisions to see if anything was done wrong. I also patrol new pages, lonely pages, abandoned pages and uncategorized pages looking for ones that would be potential candidates for deletion, and flag them for deletion when necessary. I also check the AfD semi-frequently.
  • Are you bothered?
    I always go out of my way to improve pages. If there isn't much activity in any of the special pages I watch for activity on the wiki, I will take the time to go through Special:Random and fix pages, and then go through the categories those pages are in to see if any other similar pages need fixing.

All in all, I feel I do a good job working on Brickipedia. It's one of my main activities as of lately, and I enjoy taking part in the community. It's been a while since Brickipedia has gotten a new admin, and as several have gone inactive recently for various causes, I believe I could do a good job in that place. The biggest point I'd like to make is, and I hope anyone who votes reads this (along with everything above) is that, and I realize, that I do have my flaws. Everyone does. I've made mistakes, but I'm always willing and trying to improve. Thanks for reading this. :) ToaMeiko (talk) 20:48, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've wondered why this hasn't happened yet. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 20:50, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Because I didn't think I was ready until I realized how I've met all the requirements and checklist items when I read them today. :P --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:55, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I guess I ought to look myself. Which page? --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 20:58, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship/checklist and Brickipedia:User rights/Requests --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:00, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Wait, is that a thousand mainspace edits, or a thousand edits overall? (I'm close to 1000 anyway) --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 22:20, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
    I'm guessing overall, but I still have over 1000 mainspace edits as well. --ToaMeiko (talk) 03:56, July 21, 2013 (UTC)
    Meiko would be a perfect admin, I'm also wondering why it hasn't happened yet. {{SUBST:User:Toa Winklemeyer/Sig}}
    Struck; user has less than 100 ms edits. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:59, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. The request is long overdue, Meiko is a very mature, respectable, and intelligent person, and his contributions are high quality and frequent. Support 100% TheBakonBitz My Talkpage
  3. He was up to the challenge on Brickimedia, and he's up to the challenge here. A support from me -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 22:41, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Definitely. My support has been weakened over the past few days with things that have been brought to light, but for now, still supporting. (KoN- your vote had a #:, but it looked like a supporting vote so I changed it to #. Please change back if I was wrong :S) NovaHawk 22:43, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
  5. A great contributor. In Him,
    Agent Charge 23:40, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I think this'll work well, despite a few doubts I've had of him in the past, him being admin here won't hurt, and might mean that we get some quality contributors. I will say this is a tentative support, as I am interested to see how he goes. -czech (Changed to oppose)
    It's a pretty difficult task to think of someone that's done more work for the purpose of making this wiki better than ToaMeiko. MsDtalk 14:16, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Per KoN. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:51, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
    €ħɨþ-Ŧɦé-ΣǭuƖɲØж 18:56, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Struck - as above, user has less than 100 ms ~ CJC
    Per Czech (except the tentative part) Berrybrick 18:56, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per All. Thinking with Bricks! 22:16, July 20, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  7. Great editor and chatmod. --LCF (talk!) 04:35, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
  8. I can't see any probems with the user in question and I feel he is more than capable to fulfil the role of an administrator. User:SKP4472/sig3 10:55, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Klagoer
  10. He seems to be a user who would actually edit once they've got the Admin right, and he could do good with the right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  11. It took a lot of inner debating, and I put a lot of thought into my decision to support ToaMeiko's admin nomination. The way I see it is that he has contributed so much to the wiki (as well as Brickimedia's growth) and would be trustworthy with the tools to block and delete. I feel he has already gained a great amount of respect from the community and should be given a shot at administrator. If something comes up, the community can decide from there. My vote remains supportive, as Brickipedia is all about fresh starts and a welcoming community. I believe he can contribute to that friendliness and use his responsibilities to his advantage. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 00:09, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  12. Per all, I think he should've got this months ago-Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg

Oppose

  1. Futile as this may be, I think some more time is needed. There have been some controversial reports about Meiko's chats with Sci on Skype -- from the looks of things, Sci has been intentionally provoked at times -- and I'd also like to see how he'd deal with other people who are acting in a counterproductive manner without knowing it; people who mean well, but aren't clear on the rules. (This isn't what I like to see). In addition to that, I have a gut feeling... though he's fine editing-wise. So, weak oppose. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:31, July 27, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair enough, I'm taking this into consideration. --ToaMeiko (talk) 05:40, July 27, 2013 (UTC)
    (Just thought I'd mention that the first response to my oppose -- on chat -- was not quite as docile/accepting as this one. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:38, July 27, 2013 (UTC))
    Per Jeyo. Also, we shouldn't see such things from a future admin. User:Legoboy9373/sig 15:02, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'm honestly not comfortable with this. I don't like to judge people by their behaviour at other wikis, but he has had quite a bit of trouble over at the LMBW which mirrors his interactions with Sci mentioned above... While I haven't seen this on Brickipedia yet, when that kind of borderline trolling is happening through two other mediums, I'm not comfortable with giving him the sysop bit. I would certainly be inclined to support after a couple of drama-free months, though. These concerns aside, he has the potential to be a good admin. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:12, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I'm sowwy, Meiko, but somewhat per Ajr and, uh, some other stuff relating to...some other stuff. Game & Watch 00:07, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
    Bureaucrat note - User is MsD on another account, thus eligible to vote. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:37, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Wait. More time is needed. Per AJR. {{SUBST:User:Darth henry/Sig1}} 23:42, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
  5. This is probably going to be the hugest hypocritical comment I've ever made... I honestly am REALLY not comfortable with this, at all. Meiko has had a very bad history of trolling on other wikis (mainly LMBW), something I really don't think any of our admins here have had, and I certainly don't want one now. He has also been a *bit rude* in some blogs, such as Jeyo has provided. Meiko and I have had many negative incidents in the past (such as the recent provoking people to oppose on my RfCM) and that has really changed my opinion on George very strongly, which really makes me disagree with this. I'd say wait another 6 months/year until doing this. No, just no. --- Sci (talk) 23:59, July 29, 2013 (UTC) Seeing as this already is going to be a success, I will have no further purpose on being a contributor on the wiki. I can't deal with this and I will never handle this.
    I'm pretty sure he never "provoked" anyone to oppose your RfCM. >_> Game & Watch 00:07, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
    I felt there was an attempt to provoke CM4S the day he ran for CM (which worked). ~ CJC 11:41, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  6. I really have my mine changed on this - per ajr, Jeyo, and most importanly CM4S - thiis is a big decision. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:49, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
    Incorrect. I brought it up to few others telling them how CM4S and the community could benefit from having chat moderator rights, and beyond that, I payed little to no further attention to it. --ToaMeiko (talk) 15:12, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Currently neutral, but a note that I've seen this and my vote may be subject to revision. ~ CJC 21:51, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per CJC. I'll remain neutral for the time being, but I'm still deciding which way to lean. User:1999bug/sig1 20:09, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • I thought I'd expand on my neutral (although still may not stay neutral)- here is the thing. Most RfA's, I see the name and instantly think "yes" or "no". This time I thought "oh no". Meiko is a good candidate. He is good at editing, checks everything well, is good with most of the community, well respected and well liked, and could do a lot of good as admin. But there are issues which prevent me from supporting. There has been issues that I would ignore if the request was say, in a few months time. I'd easily overlook issues with LMBW and a few other issues, as many of our admins have had them, but I'm worried about the same things as Jeyo and small other worries, but I don't think I should oppose at the moment, as I'm thinking the community would probably benefit (at least more than - if any - negatives). ~ CJC 09:54, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Bug. User:Legoboy9373/sig 15:21, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Changed vote to neutral. Still per Czech, but also NBS, CJC, and Ajr Berrybrick 00:02, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral. Per Berrybrick Legosuperheroesfan (talk)
  • Just a sidenote, Meiko said on chat that he would be "pretty much inactive" soon. Game & Watch 21:31, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • Will close tomorrow. (if a consensus is reached here~ CJC 11:37, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
    • Rules shouldn't be changed for an active nom. If a user makes a request, they do it on the understanding of current rules, and therefore whatever rules they start with are the rules that the request should end with... NovaHawk 13:47, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
      • But I was about to close it based on rules I thought existed, before it turned out other rules I thought we stopped using two years ago are still in place - so do I follow these rules it turns out existed but we just ignored for however long, or my original view of the rules? ~ CJC 13:49, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
        • (I've seen RfRs here in that past not meet all of these rules/regulations and still succeed, so I think we should go by what we've been doing, and of course with BP:UCS.) --ToaMeiko (talk) 15:03, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
  • Verdict: Okay, I'm closing this as unsuccessful, both under the 80% rule, (the vote has 2/3 support) but also because of the content of the votes. It is generally agreed that Meiko is a great editor, and a good member of the comunity, and that one day will be a good admin. However, the points raised in the oppose are important as some would appear to have happened within the month leading up to the RfA. Factoring in that Meiko is planning to take some time off soon to do other things, I believe that now may not be the time for rights (although I believe one in a few months time could easily pass.) ~ CJC 19:32, August 2, 2013 (UTC)


Mr.Brix

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done.

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I think I should be an administrator because I love wikia I find a lot of spam that should be cleaned up and I can not delete pages that I find spammed.I also believe I should be an admin because I have been on for about a year I have contributed to this wiki greatly.


Mr.Brix (talk) 23:17, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Didn't format request properly and has no connection with the community here, and lacks any relevant experience required for adminship. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:19, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I know, I left, but I couldn't pass this. No expierence and frankly, annoying. Klagoer 23:21, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Ajr. Berrybrick 23:27, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Klag and Ajr - and also, you haven't been on for a year, only since February. >_> --User:CzechMate/czech 23:53, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I've never even seen you make many constructive edits, nor are you ever in chat, active in forums, or anywhere else an admin should be. You don't enforce vandalism, spam, or policies in general. --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:11, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Ajr, and also, his attitude towards the moved users isn't pleasing, to say the least. —Unsigned comment by ErkelonJay (talk • contribs).
  7. No.--- Sci (talk) 03:02, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
  8. ... Fo real? User:Darth henry/Sig 04:26, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Not many mainspace edits/Per Meiko. ~ CJC 12:45, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
  10. Per above. –Agent Charge 03:08, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  11. Per CJC. User:Legoboy9373/sig 11:46, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  12. Um, just no. --Jay, the Cyber Assassin 15:53, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

RaceLord

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

RaceLord (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (191 edits, 7,636 mainspace)

Click the picture to see what I mean, and more stuff happend after this picture was taken, Check the history of 41005 Heartlake High
Admin needed 2.png
One of the main resons I want to be a admin is because of this pictures on the side, and another reason is that we have over 5 admins on during the day and none at night (maybe 1 for a few minutes) and when i'm up late i'm the only one on and some vandalism does happen and no one is on to block or leave a message on their talk page, telling the person to stop or they will be blocked, the one you get if you do giant vandalism or insult a user
RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Support

Neutral

  • While I do trust you with the rights and have personally seen instances where you could have seen them, I Klagoer and KoN raise some good points. Neutral. User:BrickfilmNut/sig Changed to oppose. :-/

Oppose

  1. First and foremost let me say, you are a very good user however I feel that their needs to be a bit more work to be done to become an administrator. First of all, your grammar above in your request statement drove me nuts! To quote, "i do mean salt, just think about it plz," which for one the "i" needs to be capitalized and "plz" which drove me the most bonkers really needs to be please. Also, about only half of your editcount is mainspace and I would really like that to be increased. Now, if you change your above statement and your editcount before this request closes, I will most definitely change to support. :) klagoer 13:42, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    I have some reasons to argue, but i just got up (6am-2pm sleep) and i don't want to be a jerk right now RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    I believ I was completely reasonable with the above statement, if I was not, tell me. I believe though that the comments expressed below and the one you just said above, "I have some reasons to argue, but i just got up (6am-2pm sleep) and i don't want to be a jerk right now," so are you saying that admins don't need to help with content articles to much. Are you also saying we should all type like the following: like i think that isn't right? I think know I won't change my oppose to a support because now I have some questions with maturity. If you are willing to have an open discussion with me in chat, contact me on my talkpage and we can set up a time. I am always willing to hear what you have to say. klagoer 22:53, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    All I was saying was I just got up and I didn't want to start a fight and now you guys seem like you are trying to start one RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    This isn't fighting. This is us giving you criticism which you should be open to if you want to be an admin. Berrybrick 23:01, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Klagoer completely on this... plus, we're still moving. Now's not the best time to post an RfA. Maybe once you do the above, and on Brickimedia. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 17:40, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Why are we moving in the first place? Is it because of Ads? If so thats dumb, you can just turn them off on your computer. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    [2] ----Jay is Gone. 21:51, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    This really irritates me. I have seen you ask several times if that was the only reason we are moving and EVERY SINGLE TIME at least one person as said, "No." You usually seem to get a link to this or this where you can see several reasons why that don't include ads. Not to mention, the ads are a big deal. Not everyone can turn them off. Yes, adblockers will, but not everyone has them and I'm not going to tell them what to do in that case. We are not being taken seriously because of the ads. We have been criticized on Brickset more than once because of them, and elsewhere I am sure. I am sorry if this comes off as too much, but I am frustrated. You are being ignorant and blind, which are not qualities I want in an admin. Berrybrick 21:50, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Sorry dude, I just think Ads, Brickset not liking us, and some other reasons, are not giant reasons to move over 24k of pages and try to get 20-50 users to move as well. Sorry, RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    Well, that's your problem, but you still shouldn't say that they are "stupid" reasons. And FYI, moving over all of those pages isn't that difficult, which was also stressed numerous times. Berrybrick 22:42, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't care anymore, just take this request and delete it, but i am thinking you guys don't want me as a Admin, I have done alot of stuff for the wiki, alot of stuff on LEGO City Undercover, a bit of stuff like pictures on LEGO The Lord of the Rings: The Video Game, and alot of work on other pages too, so if you don't want me to be a admin I don't care, I think I should be one RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    I won't deny that you do good work here. But your comments are convincing me more and more that you wouldn't do well with the rights. There's more to adminship than just editing: Maturity, humility and not being insufferable - none of which I've seen from you in these comments - are actually in more demand. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:58, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Per Jeyo. Berrybrick 23:01, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Whatever, RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  3. Per everyone. The "i" and "plz" turned me off. User:Darth henry/Sig 17:42, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Mostly per Klagoer, but I also have other concerns which, if you don't mind, I'd rather not voice. Oh, and you don't have to be an admin to give a warning message. Berrybrick 18:24, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I can not see this happening. --CM4Sci (talk) 22:03, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  6. No, just no. Pretty much every reply from RaceLord is more and more convincing me that he is not a very good candidate for the administrator rights, he seems to be immature, have poor grammar and is just generally rude and with remarks like "whatever," just show what little care that he has for this. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  7. Per Clone and Jeyo. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  8. Per Clone, Berry and the comment I posted that RL said "Whatever" to. :P -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:14, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Adminship/Archive4&oldid=678033"
... more about "Requests for Adminship/Archive4"
RDF feed
Has parent pageThis property is a special property in this wiki.
Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship +