Brickipedia:Requests for Bureaucrat

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for bureaucrat page, on which any user may request bureaucrat rights. Bureaucrats have the technical ability to make other users administrators. All bureaucrats must already have passed a request for adminship, and be an administrator.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
Replace this with a brief blurb about why you are requesting bureaucratship here. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Oppose====
#
====Neutral====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. All requests with unanimous support last for five days, but those with any opposing votes will last for a full two weeks.

If a user has been nominated for bureaucrat before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

There is an archive here for bureaucrat requests.

Current requests

ToaMeiko

ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,085 mainspace)

Hello fellow Brickipedians!

Today I'm taking a step forward in this community and requesting bureaucrat rights here. I do this because I feel like I am a valuable asset to this community and an active participant in all areas of the site. I have been a Brickipedian now for over a year and have had adminship for about 7 months. I am familiar with all Brickipedia policies and its community members, and have relevant experience as a bureaucrat at Meta and Customs. If you have any questions or comments, please leave them below. Happy editing! --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Support

1. Certainly someone I could trust with these rights. Good luck! -LFY1547 20:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
2. Probably the person on the site with the most need for these, actually. -Cligra
3. Per every support I've made on every prior RfR of Meiko. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Honestly, I'm a little unimpressed with your behavior. Though you are generally friendly, I don't appreciate the way you occasionally use vulgar insults and chat has become a lot more "adult" with you around, though that probably cannot all be blamed on you, nor should it. I don't think that this is enough to oppose...so I'm not. Can't deny your outstanding service. Berrybrick (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

   Vulgar insults like what? Do note that if you have an issue with anything I say, the only way for me to know that is for you to tell me. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

   Nothing too recent, but I do believe I have pointed them out to you. There was the time where you repeatedly called Kahuka a dick and vindicated it because "it's Wikipedia policy," the light use of a derogatory term like "retard" used as a casual insult, and I also do not appreciate the language you use to speak of people (who are usually not an active part of our community) negatively and so openly. I'm not sure if I've pointed that last one out before, but I am pretty sure I have brought the first two up and, no, I can't think of repeat offenses, but that's why I'm not opposing. Berrybrick (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)