Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.

If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Neutral====
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

Awesomeknight1234 (2)

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I think Knight should be a chat mod for multiple reasons. He is on chat almost daily, he is an active user with over 2000 edits, and he knows how to behave on chat. He has made some mistakes in the past and I think he has matured since the mistakes. Knight is an awesome user and I hope to see him join the ranks of the chat moderators. User:Sonofhades101/signature 19:10, September 26, 2012 (UTC) LazerzSoH

Support

  1. Has my full support, User:Sonofhades101/signature 19:10, September 26, 2012 (UTC) LazerzSoH
  2. I understand that people are currently neutral, but I don't see any reason why they should oppose. He's on a lot, and, like The Bakon Blitz says, he may not be too open about topics that he doesn't like, but it's not like he's going to ban someone because they like Kingdom (It's a current problem in his liking-stuff-ness.) 2000 - I'm awesome. (talk) 08:50, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
    On the last part: I wouldn't bank on it. --User:CzechMate/czech 09:37, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I dont him that well but all i know,hes awesome guy so i dont have eny reason to say no or a reason why you should not get the title and power. October 23 7:44 User:Korppufin/Sig

Neutral

  1. I want to support but I also look at below so neutral. klagoer 12:26, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I actually never figured out why he lost it, and I haven't talked with him lately to know if there's any reason for him to not get them back. (so I'm neutral) User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Oppose

  1. He has gotten better, but only in the last week or two. That's not long enough for me. Berrybrick 19:12, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Berrybrick. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. Still maturity concerns, and to me, he has a bit of an ego. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:30, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per Czech. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:33, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
  5. He is a good editor on Brickipedia, but isn't very open to topics he doesn't like. TheBakonBitz My Talkpage Glatorian 22:45, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Per Czech. User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:52, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per Czech. User:Irnakk/sig2
  8. Like to support, however, looking on the comments above your a bit too much of a controversial user and your not very broad on subjects you'd like to talk about. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 01:09, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
  9. As a general rule, I prefer my chatmods to be wiling to listen to subjects they aren't necessarily fond of. Not having spammed a small wiki to death is always a plus as well. User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

  • Time heals all wounds. Berrybrick 21:44, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Shaddowwarrior016

Shaddowwarrior016 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Shaddow is a good member of the community, and is mature enough for these tools, and we need more mods on at the times he is on. User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator --User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. After talking with him on chat a few times and looking at his records, he seems fit for the job. And, like Czech said, we need more mods at the times he is on. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
  3. Did some research... Supporting. User:Sonofhades101/signature 19:26, October 19, 2012 (UTC)LazerzSoH

Neutral

*(edit conflict, Clig :P) He's on at a time when no one else is, that's why nobody here knows him. I've talked with him a few times, but don't know him well enough to support. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted via chat --User:CzechMate/czech 05:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • What time of day is he usually on? Because he seems to have a lot of edits, but, according to the "Neutral" section, not many people know him. If it's at a time when nobody's on, this might continue to be the case and no progress would be made on the matter.--75.152.174.102 18:08, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Korpuffin

Korppufin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 90 mainspace)

replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. User:Sonofhades101/signature 16:49, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. No description of why and Koppufins's an ok user but I don't trust him enough/see him having a need for this right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Oppose

Comments