Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.

If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Neutral====
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

BrickfilmNut

BrickfilmNut (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,265 edits, 2,976 mainspace)

BFN is a very good editor here and has, in the short time I've known him, proven himself to be considerate, mature and quite worthy of the rights. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:08, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support

1. As nominator. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:08, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
2. Deserves the rights and could prove useful with them. - User:1999bug/sig1 03:12, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
3. Per everyone else! User:LazerzSoH/signature
4. Easily one of the most mature non-mods - this guy shows admin qualities, this is just one step closer. --User:CzechMate/czech 04:35, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
5. Great user, short time I've seen him on chat, he's very mature. I was thinking about nominating him myself, but Jeyo beat me to it. :P Klintrin--Talk--Contributions
6. Per Jeyo. Berrybrick 19:53, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
7. Per Jeyo. ~ CJC 23:50, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
8. Per CJC. User:Cligra/Sig
9. ok

Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:41, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

1. Per Bug User:Legodude101/sig
2. NovaHawk 23:32, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
3. User:Darth henry/Sig 02:40, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
4. Per.......... whoever RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
5. Only 263 Mainspace of 640? -_- Whatever, worthy of the rights. User:Hi Strike Laser/Sig

   You know, that is rather rude, especially since his edits are high quality. Berrybrick 01:42, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

   Plus I do a fair amount of my mainspace edits logged out. But it's alright; maybe I should edit more frequently. Thanks for the support in any case. :) User:BrickfilmNut/sig

   Per BB. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

6. He deserves the rights, he's active and he's mature. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Neutral

1. Not too keen on this. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 03:08, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

   Why not? Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:11, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

   # Shall change to support if the user shows a particular knowledge of the rules for moderating (a reply to this comment would be nice.); BrickFilm seems an excellent user. User:Cligra/Sig

   • Well, I've read everything I can find about this on the wiki, but my knowledge remains the same. :P Basically, chatmods are there to ensure that chat is free of vandalization, spam, and controversial/hurtful remarks. For example, some of chat's rules include no talking about religion, minimal use of Caps, no swearing, etc., and, overall, respectful behavior. If these requirements are not met by one or more users, chat mods have several options. The best option is warning, where the mod states what the trouble-maker is doing wrong and informs them about the consequences if they continue while asking them respectfully to stop. The next two options should be used sparingly; kicking kicks the targeted user from chat, and if they keep returning and causing trouble, a ban is used. If there's anything I missed, please let me know and I'll try my best to research it (a link to a page to read would also be helpful). :) User:BrickfilmNut/sig

2. I haven't really seen them on chat enough. Clone gunner commander jedi _talk

   That's because you are in different time-zones. --User:CzechMate/czech 07:48, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

   Per Czech. He is on quite a bit when I'm around. User:1999bug/sig

   Per Bug, but Clone and Legoboy are not opposing, so it is not really affecting the outcome. I would rather they do this than support without knowledge or oppose with the, "I don't know him," reason, as I have seen happen in the past. Berrybrick 19:52, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

   Per Berry Klintrin--Talk--Contributions

3. Per Clone. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:35, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

   Read Czech's response to CGCJ. User:1999bug/sig

   I have read it. And how can I support if I haven't seen how he acts in chat? User:Legoboy9373/sig 13:14, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• Accepted via chat. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:08, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

NuffSaid1995

NuffSaid1995 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I should be nominated for chat mod becasue:

1. I am on chat A LOT

2. As my last try said I should be more mature, I am.

3. My goal on this wiki was not to be just another Contributor, I wanted to help others!

4. I believe 2013 is a new beginning to what my attitude is like.

I got this! Have a great week. -NuffSaid1995 (sig is made just... erm idk how to apply it)

Comments

• I don't think that people should self-nominate for rights... at least maybe ask someone else privately to nominate you. --ErkelonJay (talk) 23:27, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

• It's fine. Berrybrick 23:35, January 10, 2013 (UTC)