Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 1/Lord Vampyre

Articles for Rating → Class 1 article nominations → Archive → Lord Vampyre

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.

• Nominated by: User:CzechMate/czech 00:30, August 21, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I think overall it is ready, and it has a new background, courtesy of me. I can't think of much else to add, but I'll have a double look

Vote score: +0, Technical Check: Currently OK

Support

#Looks good to me. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

1. I'd say it's worthy of a C1. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
2. Very good page. —Unsigned comment by Darth henry (talk • contribs).

Object

1. Personally, I'd like to see the background sourced. Non-licensed minifigs are a bit different to licensed ones- for that we have {{storyref}} which can point them to another background, and the sources are non-LEGO based. For a SW minifig, Wookieepedia is the "place to go to" to get your background, whereas with Monster Fighters, we're the "place to go to", and I just think that anything put in the background should be backed up. NovaHawk 03:03, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

   All of it comes from the Monster Fighters webpage, so do I link it there? --User:CzechMate/czech 03:14, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

   Yeah, if it's all on the one page. Otherwise, if it's across several pages, it should link to each of them. NovaHawk 01:04, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

2. Per NBS. klagoer 11:57, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. Very little original content, if it comes to that. It's an excellent C2, but that's really all. User:Cligra/Sig
4. I don't know...upon looking at some other c1 minifigure articles (and trying to promote one myself), I don't think it's large or descriptive enough to be made c1. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)

Comments

• I really don't know. The article seems to fit the criteria. The description is very thorough, but I can't evaluate the background due to my little knowledge about the theme and the minifigure. I am 100 percent neutral. Agent Charge 02:24, August 21, 2012 (UTC)
• Looks like a solid c2 to me, but not c1. NovaHawk 02:30, August 21, 2012 (UTC)
• ^ klagoer 00:21, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
• DH, you didn't leave a signature. =P Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
• This should be closed by now, and successfully. --User:CzechMate/czech 02:32, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Not Done. Overall vote count 2/4, 33% support ratio (<70%). NovaHawk 03:52, September 25, 2012 (UTC)