Brickipedia:Featured Article Nominations/41005 Heartlake High
From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.
- Nominated by: NovaHawk 00:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Vote score: +4, Technical Check: Currently OK[edit source]
- Support
- Soup's done an amazing job with this article NovaHawk 00:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think that the thumbnails could be placed better, but it's not a big complaint, especially since we need more FAs. :P Berrybrick (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks guys, I'm currently fixing the red links. It would also be a great FA for September. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3
- Per NovaFlare. Good job Soup. SKP4472 (Admin) 19:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Make Class 1 instead (this counts as an oppose to FA, but a support for C1)
- Object
- Per my comments below. ToaMeiko (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Needs a rewrite for grammar. After that, I'd support.-Cligra
- I've heavily rewritten the article for grammar, and I'm still not sure about giving it FA. Did any of you guys actually read it before supporting? I dunno. Convince me one way or the other, someone. -Cligra
- Can we at least see the re write first-Soup
- Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
- Comments
- My main concern with it is that it doesn't refer to colours by their official LEGO name, and instead (in most cases) refers to them by their Bricklink name. --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- I do the same, I don't know about Soup, but I know why I do it- I link the official colour names are linked to so it's still accurate (which is also done here), but I use more commonly used names are used for better readability- for example if you say "light yellow", people will know what you're talking about, but not so much if you say "Cool Yellow" NovaHawk 00:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Not Done. closing, as it's been well over a 4 weeks NovaHawk 07:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)