Brickipedia:Forum/Class 1 article re-evaluation/archive

The following page is an archive. Please do not vote or modify the results.

Move to FA

1382 Scary Laboratory

Vote score: +3 FA, ±0 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

1. The background was "OOU" but I've fixed that. Looks pretty good. Berrybrick (talk) 01:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
2. Could use DE and AU prices, but I don't think we'll find those. Other than that seems ok for FA to me NovaHawk 01:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
3. The images are kind of iffy, but I think it would be cool to have an older set as a FA. I'll try and use google cache for the prices. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

   In the past when I've tried to get prices from places like archive.org, only the US prices were preserved NovaHawk 00:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Demote to Complete article

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

1. Neutral LegoFan4000 ^talk 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Move to CA

10188 Death Star

Vote score: ±0 FA, +3 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. Probably could be Featured with a few stylistic tweaks, but it uses Bricklink style part numbers, the images are integrated into the description badly, and it could stand some minor rewrites. Berrybrick (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
2. I think it's MoS compliant and covers pretty much everything about the set. Not opposed exactly to FA, but it could probably go into a bit more detail with all of the rooms, and some more images of the rooms would help. Also for FA those parts pages would need to be renamed to their proper ids NovaHawk 01:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
3. Per you two Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

1. Neutral LegoFan4000 ^talk 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

10199 Winter Toy Shop

Vote score: ±0 FA, +3 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. Not bad. I'm not a huge fan of the description, because it seems to focus just as much on minor accessories as the meat of the set. That bit about the frog is confusing, the notes could be cleaned up, and I think it could use a link to that recent rerelease, whatever that was. Berrybrick (talk) 01:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
2. Definitely not FA material, but per Berrybrick NovaHawk 01:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
3. No background and rather short description Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

1. Neutral LegoFan4000 ^talk 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

4990 Rock Raiders HQ

Vote score: ±0 FA, +3 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 02:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
2. It was written in a redundant sort of manner. Mentioning that there is a boulder splitting station, talking about the color scheme of the whole structure, and then deciding to mention where the boulder splitting station is and that, surprise, a boulder can fit in it. And it did that for most of the base. I removed most of that stuff, but still not worth featuring imo. Berrybrick (talk) 03:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
3. The description is far too short and vague. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

3061 City Park Café

Vote score: ±0 FA, +3 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. Could use some cleanup. I didn't read the whole thing, but describing the pieces that the orange juice carton is made of rather than just saying that there is an orange juice carton (if even bothering) probably wasn't my best move. :P There is such a thing as too much. Berrybrick (talk) 03:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

   Pft. Have you read my FAs? :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

2. I like it, though personally I'd rather feature something grander. Though we don't have anything grander to display currently, I really need to get back to writing these. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
3. NovaHawk 12:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

1. Neutral LegoFan4000 ^talk 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

• Wow, I used to write really detailed descriptions. :P I'm not going to vote (at least not now) because of that. Also, @Soupperson1: is the yellow kitchen accessory set still exclusive to this? This notes say so. Berrybrick (talk) 01:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
• Borderline FA/CA to me, got to go now so will need to have a better look when I can. (acting as Soup): Yes, it's still exclusive. But only in yellow, it's appeared in other colours NovaHawk 01:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

• Darn it you beat me to it, it's generally confused with the flame yellowish orange version but in bright yellow its exclusive. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

5659 The Great Train Chase

Vote score: ±0 FA, +3 CA, ±0 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

1. NovaHawk 02:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
2. Nothing wrong with it, but not something I would choose to feature with some of the other options. Berrybrick (talk) 03:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
3. It definitely doesn't seem FA worthy. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Demote to standard article

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

Comments

Move to Standard

55000 LEGO Universe

Vote score: ±0 FA, ±0 CA, +3 Standard. Technical Check: Currently OK

Promote to Featured article

Demote to Complete article

Demote to standard article

1. NovaHawk 02:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
2. This is the sort of content I would like to feature more, but yeah, per Nova. Berrybrick (talk) 03:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
3. Personally I think my friends video game article is better than this. :P It seems rather short for such an expansive game too. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Technical MoS Check (administrators only)

• It's a mess. I can give specific reasons if requested. Definitely doesn't comply with current video game MoS NovaHawk

02:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments