Brickipedia:Good article review

This page lists good articles that have several shortcomings and need to be revised.

Atlantis

I don't know. Did I really vote for this? This article looks like an incohesive collection of text snippets. All I see are bullet points. (well this may actually conform to the GA criteria, but almost every article could pass the "Have at least one well-written original paragraph describing what the article is about" criterion, which basically describes what a good lead section should actually be.) Maybe someone with more expertise on the subject can rewrite the article in the style of Power Miners. --User:LegOtaku/sig 08:27, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

• I agree that this could do with a bit of a cleanup. Having the bullet points from the "Characters" section and the lead section in "Minifigures" is my main concern, but I don't really know too much about Atlantis either and don't want to ruin it NovaHawk 04:42, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

6086 Black Knight's Castle

• The "Castles that use the same baseplate" bit under "See also" could be called either incomplete, or having one set listed which doesn't have this part- it depends on whether we're listing the element or design id (see Part 2552 on Peeron- set 6082 is listed as having part 2552px5, whilst set 8086 has part 2552px6). I'm not sure whether sets with the same design or element id should be listed, so I didn't change any of it. NovaHawk 23:08, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • The only different lies in the color of the rocks of the print pattern (6082 has some black rocks, while the other sets have dark grey ones). But the pattern itself is identical on those baseplates. --User:LegOtaku/sig 14:52, March 20, 2010 (UTC)