Brickipedia:Proposed Splits

Articles for Deletion - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits - Proposed Name Changes

Overview

Proposed Splits lists articles that are proposed to be split into two or more articles.

To propose an article split, put {{Split}} on the top the respective page, then click here and replace Page 1 with the name of the article you want split. Replace Page 2 and Page 3 with the names of the articles that Page 1 should be split into, and add more if necessary. From there, leave a brief explanation as to why the article should be split directly under the header, and then sign (~~~~) under the ;Support section. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so.

If you want to make a new suggestion, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] split into "<article>" and "<article>" ==
<nominator comment (optional)>
;Support
# ~~~~
;Oppose
;Comments

CUUSOO, split into "Cuusoo (Company)" and "CUUSOO (theme)"

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Page doesn't exist anymore Support Split. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature Two different things deserve two different pages to me NovaHawk 23:13, July 28, 2013 (UTC) Per NovaFlare MsDtalk 17:21, August 1, 2013 (UTC) Oppose Yeah, a split isn't really needed... -King of Nynrah Talk 12:20, January 15, 2012 (UTC) Well if a split isn't needed, do we use {{company}} or {{theme}}? NovaHawk 22:18, January 15, 2012 (UTC) Per KoN, don't see any real necessary need for it. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 09:10, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Comments Are they two separate things? I'm not really sure... NovaHawk 11:33, January 15, 2012 (UTC) Well, the CUUSOO company run the CUUSOO site which is where you vote for the CUUSOO theme. - CJC 11:43, January 15, 2012 (UTC) Formatting changed to what we're more used to (with support/oppose/comments sections). Please revert if anything was lost in translation. NovaHawk 23:13, July 28, 2013 (UTC) Delete both, make one page summarizing the LEGO CUUSOO platform/website before LEGO Ideas. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC) It's a request to split so there isn't anything to delete. I assume such a page existed at the time of the split request, but has since been moved to LEGO Ideas. While a page as you describe would be helpful, it doesn't exactly full under the scope of this request, and so I'll close it now. CJC95 (talk) 20:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:The Lord of the Rings (and "...minifigures"), split into Category:The Lord of the Rings and Category:The Hobbit (and "... minifigures")

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done years ago Support We seem to be grouping all the Hobbit stuff with the LOTR things, but they appear to be separate themes. There's a big "HOBBIT" on the boxes, not "The Lord of the Rings"... NovaHawk 00:48, October 10, 2012 (UTC) I don't see how this is much different from grouping DC and Marvel together, but I guess that we don't do sub-sub-themes, so Support I guess. Berrybrick 10:21, October 10, 2012 (UTC) Support User:Legosuperheroesfan/sig5 Per NBS- er, I mean, Nova. :P BrickfilmNut (talk) 00:13, November 26, 2013 (UTC) Oppose Comments {{{content}}}

Phoenix split into "Phoenix" and "Jean Grey"

In a SDCC LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Gameplay Demo, when you go to about 6:15, watch a bit, and when they enter the level, Phoenix is player 2, then later in the level they play as Jean Grey. Even though they are the same person they shouldn't be on the same page. (examples: Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader, Peter Parker and Spider-Man, etc)
Also, odd that they showed Phoenix, even only for a few quick seconds, and she wasn't in the character selection board.......thingy
RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Support

1. I'm only going off the X-Men movie trilogy (ie, what I've seen), because reading summaries of comic books get way too complicated and I can't understand them. In the movies, it seemed like there were two very distinct personalities fighting for control of the same body (I think Xavier even said something along those lines), and Phoenix's powers were more extreme than Jean's normally. At the moment, I'm seeing this as a Bruce Banner/Hulk situation, so I'm voting for a split for now. NovaHawk 22:43, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
2. Sure MsD^talk 17:21, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

1. I'm leaning towards oppose, but I'm neutral because after reading a very confusing Wikipedia article, I have decided that sometimes Jean and Phoenix are one in the same, but at others they are kind of different characters (since Phoenix pretty much takes over her life). Also, Jean hasn't gone by an alias at times, so I'm not sure if I would agree with it being like Peter Parker and Spider-Man. Maybe Tony Stark and Iron-Man though, but now I'm confusing myself. Anyway, at others she has used Phoenix and the green costume even when she wasn't possessed. Additionally, my guess as for why she doesn't appear on the character selection is that Jean can transform into Phoenix similarly to how Hulk can switch to Banner. Just speculation, but it seemed like it was appropriate to bring up. —Unsigned comment by Berrybrick (talk • contribs).

   Transforming into Phoenix makes sense, but why enter the level as Phoenix? Also read Jean Grey and Phoenix. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

   I don't know why she enters the level as Phoenix, but I'm not sure how it makes much of a difference? (Also, I'm not interested in reading those pages. Wikipedia was confusing enough for me. I don't need it in more detail.) Berrybrick 04:44, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

   You Confused me. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

   Sorry. Reworded. :P Berrybrick 04:51, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

   no Confused me with the first paragraph. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

   Did you actually read it? Berrybrick 20:17, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

2. I'm leaning towards oppose too. Honestly, Jean Grey is Phoenix, but they can have completely different personalities. Jean Grey stopped calling herself Jean Grey once she turned into the Phoenix. In simpler words, she "upgraded" into a more powerful version of herself, but that version can take over her, and turn her into a completely different person. Phoenix (green suit) is different from Dark Phoenix (red suit), so I think having 3 pages, Jean, Phoenix and Dark Phoenix is fine, but I'm still not fully into oppose Bridgetterocks My talk!!! 21:19, October 7, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Move both into Jean Grey. They are the same person, and don't have enough variants for the Anakin/Vader route. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 20:16, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• Ummm.... :P Before I say anything: Phoenix=green suit, Jean Grey=yellow suit right? NovaHawk 05:28, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

• Sometimes, according to Wikipedia. :P Berrybrick 14:47, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

• if you haven't read every comic since the 60s, if you don't own all the comics since the 60s, if sites don't it clear. Phoenix Force enters person = Phoenix (Jean Grey, Emma Frost, etc). RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

• Yes, but I'm guessing you haven't either. Anyway, Wikipedia did cite what I am about to say (but I can't be bothered to look it up). During one point, Jean was free of the Phoenix Force but still retained some of the powers and continued using the costume and codename. Berrybrick 20:07, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

• @Berrybrick- I mean the minifigures ;) NovaHawk 22:43, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

• Yes. :P Berrybrick 23:03, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks :P Just wanted to make sure :) NovaHawk 23:13, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Blue Classic Spaceman, split into Blue Classic Spaceman and Benny

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Done years ago For those of you who don't know, a "Blue Classic Spaceman" will appear in The LEGO Movie as Benny. Benny, however, is a slightly different minifigure with intentional flaws, as you can see here. Aside from that, there are several blue classic spacemen (though maybe not in the movie) but Benny is a separate character paying tribute to them. I'm not sure if I explained that well, but I'll do my best to respond to any criticisms.... Berrybrick 23:13, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Edit: We already have a Benny article. But since this one would almost definitely be of higher interest (I used to watch Bob the Builder and I don't even remember that guy) I would still make this new page Benny, and change the old one to Benny (Bob the Builder). Berrybrick 23:15, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Discussion Split, as nominator. Berrybrick Split, I'd say this is a good idea. -Kingpinn2 (talk) 23:22, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Split, ^ -LFY1547 23:31, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Split, surprised they weren't two separate articles in the first place. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 23:33, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Per EreklonJay. Legosuperheroesfan (talk) 23:47, November 25, 2013 (UTC) Split, per all. BrickfilmNut (talk) 00:13, November 26, 2013 (UTC) Split, Change Benny to Benny (Bob the Builder) and make Benny (Disambiguation) and Benny (LEGO Movie) RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing. We don't need a disambiguation when there are only two articles it would link to and one is clearly of higher interest than the other. For an example, see this and this. Berrybrick 01:28, November 26, 2013 (UTC) Split- Diferent minifigures.--Toa Matau 01:05, November 27, 2013 (UTC) Why was the page I made deleted? Can we change it back? -Kingpinn2 (talk) 17:20, November 28, 2013 (UTC) Split, Benny and the Blue Classic Spaceman are both the same, though benny is his official/real name. --King Kahuka (talk) 04:15, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Solomon Blaze, split into Solomon Blaze (Ultra Agents) and Solomon Blaze (Galaxy Squad)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Don't split I don't think they're the same character, they just have similar names. If you look at this image and the Galaxy Squad Solomon picture, you can see the face details are different. Galaxy Squad is far more futuristic than Ultra Agents, yet the Ultra Agents Solomon Blaze is older. They're could be the same, like the whole Brains thing, but I doubt it. --Knight Discussion Split, as nominator. --Knight Keep, until we know any different. It could well be that he's just older- we don't know what year either Galaxy Squad or Ultra Agents is set in. NovaHawk 03:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Keep until we know some story and background of Ultra Agents. --ToaMeiko (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Keep Sad truth, people age. It would be a strange coincidence just a year later to reintroduce different characters with such distinctive names. ^ Berrybrick (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC) So, it has been confirmed that they are the same character some time ago. Close? :P Berrybrick (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

OverBorg split into "OverBorg" and "Cyrus Borg"

From what I know, the OverBorg is a different character altogether, who is the Overlord possessing the body of Cyrus. I don't think the OverBorg has appeared in the TV series yet, but Cyrus himself has plenty of background and contributions to the plot of the current series that he could have his own article. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

• Split, as nominator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
• Split, yeah I'm pretty sure that what you've said is true, but I'm only going by what I've heard people say in forums. Berrybrick (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
• Split, feels right. Person went under a transformation, like Anakin: Two pages. Sibo2808 (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
• Umm... so confused... keep... I think. This is going solely off the comment above (and I haven't got around to eps 3 and 4 of the new series yet, so I'm way behind and don't want to look at forums). If he's the same guy and just possesed, I'm not seeing a need for it. It's feeling more like a Chancellor Palpatine/Emperor Palpatine case to me moreso than Anakin/Vader. Besides, we have one and only one physical minifigure of the guy, it's not like there are a million variants where it makes sense to keep them separate (please note, I'm typing this very quickly and probably not making too much sense because I really shouldn't be on right now) NovaHawk 07:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • The OverBorg, from what I know, is the Overlord in Cyrus's (somewhat mutilated) body, from what it appears. I think OverBorg, if it doesn't have its own page, should be included in the Overlord's page, since it's still the Overlord, just in a more human form. Cyrus however, has plenty of his own story. Before the series started, we knew he was paralysed from birth, and that he did a ton of things to build a technological empire in New Ninjago City. He's also had a role in just about every episode he's appeared in, and he hasn't even been possessed/killed/used by the Overlord yet. To be honest, we only know about the OverBorg from sets. It may not even appear in the TV series. While I'm sure it will, that's an example of how little we know about it and how much more we know about Cyrus. --ToaMeiko (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Toa Mata/Toa Nuva split into "Toa Mata" and "Toa Nuva"

Either rename into Toa Nuva or split, I'm not sure which. Actually, I guess that we need to decide whether we want this to be a subtheme page, or a faction page. Subtheme seems like the obvious choice, but there was some forum which never got proper closure which discussed pages grouping minifigures which are related under a common banner. I don't remember the details. If we go the faction route, the Phantoka and Mistika stuff, plus upcoming sets might confuse and complicate things.

Split

1. I'd go the subtheme route, myself. Berrybrick (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Rename

Oppose

1. Subtheme seems kind of weird; I'd have never thought of classifying them that way. I think just keeping it as a faction page is the way to go. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

   That's how Brickset has always listed them. :P BS01 also keeps the separate, despite the wiki being based heavier on the story (where one page would make more sense than with products, in my opinion). The way I envision it as a faction page is just sort of messy, though I guess it could work. (And I just don't like having the slash in the title, hence the rename option. :P) Berrybrick (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Template:SHsets to "Template:DCsets" and "Template:Marvelsets"

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Split Split I just think having them separate would be easier to navigate personally :S NovaHawk 02:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC) I guess. CJC95 (talk) 12:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Keep Comments

Stormtrooper stuff

LEGO seems to be being stingy on naming their Stormtrooper variants lately (both Imperial and First Order). These are quotes for the shop descriptions:

• 75132: Includes 4 minifigures: 2 First Order Stormtroopers, First Order Technician and a First Order Crew.
  • This includes a standard First Order Stormtrooper and a First Order Heavy Artillery Stormtrooper.
• 75139: Includes 5 minifigures: Finn, Maz Kanata, Kylo Ren and 2 First Order Stormtroopers.
  • This includes a standard First Order Stormtrooper and a Riot control stormtrooper (obviously FN-2199, but we can't say that for sure)
• 75134: Includes 4 minifigures: 2 Imperial Stormtroopers, an Imperial Shock Trooper and an Imperial Technician
  • This includes two Jump troopers.

So, do we want to have them all under the First Order Stormtrooper and Stormtrooper pages because we don't have an official name from LEGO, or have separate pages for them?

First Order Heavy Artillery Stormtrooper

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Split Have a separate page They're a separate distinct variant- it would be like having Scout Troopers and Snowtroopers on the Stormtrooper page. Referring to the naming policy, I don't know if this is really a contradiction as such, but I think it would make things a lot easier to organise if we had separate pages. NovaHawk 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Delete and merge to First Order Stormtrooper Comments Note- I made this page prior to the shop description coming out, that's why it's currently on a separate page. NovaHawk 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Riot Control Stormtrooper

Have a separate page

Keep on First Order Stormtrooper

Comments

• Neutral- This one's trickier. While in SW they are distinct variants with different weapons and training, their armour is exactly the same, and as such the minifigure is identical to a standard First Order Stormtrooper except it has a baton. Not sure how to handle this one. NovaHawk 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Jump Trooper

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Split Have a separate page See reasoning for the heavy FO trooper. Ok, so the only difference is the jetpack and the scratches printed on the armour, but it's enough for me NovaHawk 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Delete and merge to Stormtrooper Comments Note- I made this page prior to the shop description coming out, that's why it's currently on a separate page. NovaHawk 11:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Cars, split into "Cars (series)", "Cars" and "Cars 2"

• Currently Cars covers the whole series (Cars), Cars (the first movie) and Cars 2. Since Cars 3 is coming out, I don't see why we should split this page up into one theme and two subtheme pages NovaHawk 23:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Split

1. NovaHawk 23:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
2. Sure, sounds like a good idea to me SamanthaNguyen (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
3. Berrybrick (talk) 04:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
4. Vasko (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep

Comments