Brickipedia:Request for Adminship/Archive

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Thank you for considering volunteering as an administrator here on Brickipedia! Before you do, however, please go through the following list to make sure that your request will pass.

Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made a few thousand contributions to articles here?

I have made around 1300 edits on Brickimedia (of which 1200 are here, on 'pedia). I joined Brickimedia in Feb 2014 and have been active since, though I have gone through phases of inactivity.

Do you regularly participate on the forums?

I do.

Do you revert vandalism when you see it, or tag pages for deletion?

Absolutely. I (think) I understand the difference between 'good faith' and vandalism edits. I revert, or more often, tag pages for deletion.

Are you bothered?

I guess. I am one of the few (or is it only?) users who have joined since the move that has stayed active.

--LK901 16:13, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. LK is trustworthy, dedicated, and could certainly make use of his rights. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  2. This request might be a little premature, but sure. Berrybrick (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  3. Sure. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  4. (CTU) 4102 rebotcO 42 ,10:71 (klat) 59CJC .ztaddarjA reP
  5. Of course! Great user! NFB reP. Sibo2808 (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  6. Jolly good fun! Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  7. NovaHawk (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  8. Per Berrybrick but why not. -NBP3.0 (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  9. LK exhibits plenty of dedication and is good at what he does, so I'm definitely supporting. - Bug (talk) 18:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  10. ToaMeiko (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Neutral; Everything I've heard about this user makes want to support, but I haven't known him long enough to see/decide for myself. :P --Jeyo (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

CheetahBricks

CheetahBricks (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am requesting Adminship here because I think I have the proper material and right to be upgraded to an admin and become a more helpful user. CheetahBricks (talk) 11:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC) --CheetahBricks (talk) 11:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Does not begin to meet the recommended requirements for time, edits, forum usage or maintenance. CJC95 (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Soupperson1

Soupperson1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (14,954 edits, 8,475 mainspace)

Here I go..I think I'd be a good admin, here are some points: my grammar and spelling have dramatically improved. I am in the top 10 most active users. I've been a chat mod for over a year. I have not been banned once. I have increased the ratings of many articles. I love this site and wish to protect it. Thank you Soupperson1 (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg Have a soupy day!

Support

  1. I'm supporting for most of the stuff you've said. :P You're a good editor and follow the rules of Brickimedia. You also have a good personality that's friendly for new users. --Knight
    1. Thanks Knight your a gem :P Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  2. Per above. -LFY1547 18:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  3. CJC95 (talk) 19:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  4. CJC makes a very compelling argument. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  5. I had to think about this, but CJC's argument convinced me. Berrybrick (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  6. More admins? :P Ajraddatz (talk) 06:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  7. Soup (is a great) person (Soupperson :P). Done a lot of edits, really supporting, kind and friendly and very responsible. :-) User:Sibo2808/Sig

Oppose

  1. CM4S opposing, nothing new to you people. Soup, you are an awesome friend, but we haven't talked lately. I, personally, haven't been on Bricki as much as I'd like. Considering this is Brickimedia, I don't ever look at the recent wiki activity. I haven't seen you do anything... at all, really. That may be my fault, but when I WAS on a lot, you weren't really 'admin-ready.' You don't necessarily have the correct admin behavior. Heck, neither do I, but that's just me. You've been a bit (I hate this word) immature at times. I haven't really seen you do anything really. Please don't take this the wrong way, I really think you're cool, but I'm just going to have to say no. Sorry. --CM4Sci (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks for your constructive criticism, but if you look at recent changes for the past few days most of it is me :P I'd only hate you if you started a hate campaign. :P Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Soup has actually done a lot of good edits recently. --Knight
  2. Based off past memories of Soup trolling at the LMBW with a raid group. MsD (Talk) 20:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. ToaMeiko (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  2. --TheNightingale 02:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  3. Great editor and usually a friendly user. I can't bring myself to support however due to some comments made about certain users during the move off Wikia NovaHawk 04:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    I can't remember making comments execpt in a private message to Berry :P, and that was about a year ago. I wasn't very active for this move, so I doubt I made comments. So could you give an example, please(that isn't Sansse :P)? Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    (Sannse was the one I had in mind, so no :P) NovaHawk 10:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    Sannse wasn't really a user, just wikia staff. Plus didn't we all comment about her?Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  4. Vasko (talk) 09:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  5. Don't know the user. --LK901100 AE - TLM RP 16:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Considering Soup's disappeared for a week without notice... what now? ----Jay 17:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

LFY1547

LFY1547 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (27 edits, 962 mainspace)

I'm still fairly active here and almost always checking up on RecentChanges or #cvn-brickimedia. Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made a few thousand contributions to articles here?

Yes. I've been active on the wiki since late June last year, and have since made over 1,200 mainspace edits with both of my accounts (235 on my previous one).

Do you regularly participate on the forums?

Yes. I give my opinion on nearly every forum if I get the chance to.

Do you revert vandalism when you see it, or tag pages for deletion?

Yes. I have reverted vandalism multiple times since becoming active and I have tagged plenty of review pages for deletion recently. I also have experience with undoing vandalism on Wikia, where I do it globally.

Are you bothered?

When it's needed, I often help. A recent example of this I can provide is while I was working on articles at LMBW, I was asked to tag any empty review pages I found for deletion. I'm willing to help out the wiki whenever it is needed. (although sometimes I'm not around when it is needed. :P)

Thanks for your vote, whether it be a support or oppose, I always like to know what I can improve on. :) -LFY1547 00:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support. Known him for a long time and I'm quite sure he could be trusted with administrator rights. Klintrin (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I'd say you're close, but not there yet. You have good judgement and don't have difficulty editing. My primary concern is your activity. You can fluctuate from very active to long periods of inactivity with short or no notice. You also say you'll start editing again "soon" but often times never do... Something I rarely see in your edits is content creation, which is something you should be active in as an administrator. My suggestion would be to wait a few months before requesting adminship and be continuously active in editing. Possibly try to involve yourself in content improvement and after some time try to join the quality check group. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
    Completely understood. :-) I'll work on it. Thanks for the response! -LFY1547 01:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, I just can't support anyone if they've only done 12 mainspace edits this month. Not that any of us current admins having been doing anything great either, but for me to actually support admin rights, they'd have to be pretty regular in the mainspace NovaHawk 01:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
    Per my above reply, understood and working on it :-) Thanks for the response -LFY1547 01:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  3. Per NovaFlare. Although it's extremely hypocritical coming from myself as I barely edit these days, admins should be making lots of contributions and demonstrating that they are productive in counter-vandalism and taking part in forum discussions. I'm not saying you aren't doing these things, but you should continue to do this regularly. Other than that I feel that you are a promising candidate and I wish you luck for the next time you choose to apply for adminship. Until then, keep up the good work. :) SKP4472 (Admin) 21:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Pass

BrickfilmNut

BrickfilmNut (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,300 edits, 3,001 mainspace)

So, wow, this is finally happening. :P Anyway, I definitely believe that I am ready for sysop rights. I am an active contributor, am online at a variety of hours, and have faced many situations in which I could make good use of the rights. I also have proven myself trustworthy with rights usage both at Brickipedia, where I have chat moderator, rollback, patroller, and CQM rights, and at a variety of other wikis where I possess admin and/or 'crat rights. With sysop rights at Brickipedia, I feel that I can expand my role as a Brickipedia editor, and I am hopeful that this request will pass. BrickfilmNut (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. Berrybrick (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  2. One of the most trustworthy Brickipedians I know. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  3. Absolutely. BFN is one of the most mature and trustworthy people here. Full support. -LFY1547 18:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  4. Of course! Ajraddatz (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  5. I'd trust him with the rights! Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  6. About time. -Klint
  7. Finally. CJC95 (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  8. YES. Jeyo (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  9. I laughed when I saw this. I was just surprised I hadn't thought to nominate him already. Drew1200 (talk)
  10. Good guy, can take on the role easily, great person, and a pleasure to contribute with you on here. -Czech
  11. Yes, just yes. -SirComputer (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  12. I've known this was going to happen since before June. MsD (Talk) 21:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  13. I can finally stop nagging tou to make a request :D NovaHawk 18:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  14. I've been asking him to do this for a while.BobaFett2 (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  15. Per all above. Vasko (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  16. I thought I supported this already, then flipped out because I realize that I actually didn't support yet. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  17. I have trusted BFN many times, and i think he is the admin-like people who don't get angry at me or kick me for my warped attitude. He would even be perfect for admin because he technically acts like one. Also, per LazerzSoH. --King Kahuka (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Request_for_Adminship/Archive&oldid=1056433"