Forum:Brickipedia: The reincarnation/Results

Forums - Brickipedia: The reincarnation/Results

This page is waiting to be archived by an administrator. Please do not edit the contents of this page. The following is simply a summary of the results from the forums. Section 1: Policy forums Most discussion shall take place on a single page. This includes MoS discussions Votes may be used to decide discussions, but do not have to. Forums should be open until a consensus of some sort is reached. If a forum gets little activity, then a consensus may be achieved by as little as two people. Old forums should be moved into a suitable archive. Section 2: User rights All user rights requests will now take place on one page. Importer user group to be removed. Administrator and Bureaucrat will be merged. BAG is to be dissolved, and bot requested as other user rights. User rights removal as stated. Section 3: Manual of Style Add info about the LEGO Minifigure bio to the MOS for minifigures. Keep using box images, unless UCS applies Recommend order for themes Future information should be sourced Section 4: Article Ratings Move to a 4-tier system Section 5: Chat Chat policies to be kept as they are. Section 6: The Budget To be kept at admin wiki. Section 7: Reviews Add inventory and review sections to set infobox Remove ratings from reviews namespace, and adopt a "BOTM-style" for reviews to feature on the main reviews page. Section 8: Wikiforums/User blogs Section 9: Content improvement (BrickiProjects, etc) BrickiProjects should be more like user blog contests. Somehow. Section 10: Templates and infoboxes Unless specified by LEGO, set release dates should be to the nearest month. Use the new designed theme table since the old one doesn't work most of the time. Section 11: Current policies Section 12: The site's appearance Keep Refreshed as default skin Do not install the Monaco skin Section 13: Categories Section 14: Anything new to implement? Section 15: Miscellaneous Brickipedian of the Month to be kept as is. Questions How are these results being determined? Is there a minimum amount of support each proposal needs? --ToaMeiko (talk) 02:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Just when it's been open for a while (at least over a week), there's a very obvious consensus, and there hasn't been any discussion for a while. So basically BP:UCS. But this is exactly why I set it up to be done in stages, with the forum section done first. But instead, everyone ignored that and went off discussing everything at once. NovaHawk 02:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)