Abuse filter log

Details for log entry 1,542

17:24, 20 March 2014: Lego613master (talk | contribs) triggered filter 10, performing the action "edit" on Talk:Cavalry. Actions taken: Tag; Filter description: No signature in forum or talk pages (examine)

Changes made in edit

Action parameters

Variable	Value
Edit count of the user `(user_editcount)`	310
Name of the user account `(user_name)`	Lego613master
Groups (including implicit) the user is in `(user_groups)`	* user autoconfirmed emailconfirmed
Page ID `(page_id)`	0
Page namespace `(page_namespace)`	1
Page title (without namespace) `(page_title)`	Cavalry
Full page title `(page_prefixedtitle)`	Talk:Cavalry
Action `(action)`	edit
Edit summary/reason `(summary)`
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) `(minor_edit)`
Old page wikitext, before the edit `(old_wikitext)`
New page wikitext, after the edit `(new_wikitext)`	<!--- NOTE: BEFORE CREATING A TALK PAGE, BE AWARE THAT THIS IS NOT A GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM. THE DISCUSSION FORUM IS Special:Forum . THIS PAGE IS FOR CONTENT ABOUT DEVELOPING AND IMPROVING THE ARTICLE ONLY ---> {{Talkheader}} {{History}} {{HistoryEntry \| date = \| oldid = \| process = \| result = }} {{HistoryCurrent \|status= }} == Status of [[Cavalry]] == I planned to do some major expansion on this page. However, I knew little about the Western themes. So, I did a bit of research on [http://brickset.com/sets/theme-Western\|Brickset] so see what, exactly, the subtheme was composed of. However, I discovered that, according to Brickset at least, the subtheem does not exist. There are several sets that ''could'' classify as being 'Cavalry', but if Brickset doesn't acknowledge its existence, I'm inclined to believe it doesn't really exist. Should the page be deleted? Or am I incorrect here?
Unified diff of changes made by edit `(edit_diff)`	@@ -1 +1,15 @@ +<!--- NOTE: BEFORE CREATING A TALK PAGE, BE AWARE THAT THIS IS NOT A GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM. THE DISCUSSION FORUM IS Special:Forum . THIS PAGE IS FOR CONTENT ABOUT DEVELOPING AND IMPROVING THE ARTICLE ONLY ---> +{{Talkheader}} +{{History}} +{{HistoryEntry +\| date = +\| oldid = +\| process = +\| result = +}} +{{HistoryCurrent +\|status= +}} +== Status of [[Cavalry]] == +I planned to do some major expansion on this page. However, I knew little about the Western themes. So, I did a bit of research on [http://brickset.com/sets/theme-Western\|Brickset] so see what, exactly, the subtheme was composed of. However, I discovered that, according to Brickset at least, the subtheem does not exist. There are several sets that ''could'' classify as being 'Cavalry', but if Brickset doesn't acknowledge its existence, I'm inclined to believe it doesn't really exist. Should the page be deleted? Or am I incorrect here?
New page size `(new_size)`	898
Old page size `(old_size)`	0
Size change in edit `(edit_delta)`	898
Lines added in edit `(added_lines)`	<!--- NOTE: BEFORE CREATING A TALK PAGE, BE AWARE THAT THIS IS NOT A GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM. THE DISCUSSION FORUM IS Special:Forum . THIS PAGE IS FOR CONTENT ABOUT DEVELOPING AND IMPROVING THE ARTICLE ONLY ---> {{Talkheader}} {{History}} {{HistoryEntry \| date = \| oldid = \| process = \| result = }} {{HistoryCurrent \|status= }} == Status of [[Cavalry]] == I planned to do some major expansion on this page. However, I knew little about the Western themes. So, I did a bit of research on [http://brickset.com/sets/theme-Western\|Brickset] so see what, exactly, the subtheme was composed of. However, I discovered that, according to Brickset at least, the subtheem does not exist. There are several sets that ''could'' classify as being 'Cavalry', but if Brickset doesn't acknowledge its existence, I'm inclined to believe it doesn't really exist. Should the page be deleted? Or am I incorrect here?
Unix timestamp of change `(timestamp)`	1395336240