This page is waiting to be archived by an administrator. Please do not edit the contents of this page.
|
The following is simply a summary of the results from the forums.
Section 1: Policy forums
- Most discussion shall take place on a single page.
- This includes MoS discussions
- Votes may be used to decide discussions, but do not have to.
- Forums should be open until a consensus of some sort is reached.
- If a forum gets little activity, then a consensus may be achieved by as little as two people.
- Old forums should be moved into a suitable archive.
Section 2: User rights
- All user rights requests will now take place on one page.
- Importer user group to be removed.
- Administrator and Bureaucrat will be merged.
- BAG is to be dissolved, and bot requested as other user rights.
- User rights removal as stated.
Section 3: Manual of Style
- Add info about the LEGO Minifigure bio to the MOS for minifigures.
- Keep using box images, unless UCS applies
- Recommend order for themes
- Future information should be sourced
Section 4: Article Ratings
Section 5: Chat
- Chat policies to be kept as they are.
Section 6: The Budget
- To be kept at admin wiki.
Section 7: Reviews
- Add inventory and review sections to set infobox
- Remove ratings from reviews namespace, and adopt a "BOTM-style" for reviews to feature on the main reviews page.
Section 8: Wikiforums/User blogs
Section 9: Content improvement (BrickiProjects, etc)
- BrickiProjects should be more like user blog contests. Somehow.
Section 10: Templates and infoboxes
- Unless specified by LEGO, set release dates should be to the nearest month.
- Use the new designed theme table since the old one doesn't work most of the time.
Section 11: Current policies
Section 12: The site's appearance
- Keep Refreshed as default skin
- Do not install the Monaco skin
Section 13: Categories
Section 14: Anything new to implement?
Section 15: Miscellaneous
- Brickipedian of the Month to be kept as is.
QuestionsEdit
- How are these results being determined? Is there a minimum amount of support each proposal needs? --ToaMeiko (talk) 02:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Just when it's been open for a while (at least over a week), there's a very obvious consensus, and there hasn't been any discussion for a while. So basically BP:UCS. But this is exactly why I set it up to be done in stages, with the forum section done first. But instead, everyone ignored that and went off discussing everything at once. NovaHawk 02:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
|