Forum:A messy Wiki
, Neutral and Oppose templates. Allowing more organisation on things. Especially the chat moderation voting process. Although I understand that I may be new to this Wiki and I realize I do not qualify to become an administrator, I know what can be done here and I will work very hard to assist in anyway possible. All thoughts and comments will be welcomed. Regards, 343 TheGuiltyProphet | TALK - EDITS | 21:54, December 31, 2012 (UTC) Comments[edit source]
NuffSaid was here and there LIEK A BAWS (talk) 22:35, December 31, 2012 (UTC)NuffSaid1995 I know you are jelly of my sig ;)
There are things the wiki need to work on. I don't think it would be any of these. Content perhaps. Organisation in terms of categories (which I'm working on anyway). Reliability at times. Any way, specifically looking at your points
In summary, I don't think any of the points raised are pressing issues for the wiki, certainly not as pressing as some of the ones I mentioned above. ~ CJC 01:11, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Regards, 343 TheGuiltyProphet | TALK - EDITS | 13:46, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
neutral and no templates, but nobody uses them because we don't need to. I personally don't like looking at a discussion and just seeing templates. Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:58, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
343 TheGuiltyProphet | TALK - EDITS | 17:20, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
Also, I can't believe how disrespectuful and undermining to the people who have spent hours of work to this wiki on templates and just basically calling them useless. If it is so bad then how about you tell us how to fix them rather then groan and complain at us. As for chat, if I remember correctly you were one of the people who made chat mods go crazy. If I remember I asked you to stop focusing on something so stupid but you kept presisting in negotiating how you were right about something (which you never really told us why you were griping) and we should all focus on something non-wiki related. So what I find you saying is unreasonable and I think that this wiki is fine how it is. Thank you for reading. klagoer 17:36, January 2, 2013 (UTC) |